Craig Russell wrote:
> we close that particular documentation loophole and have everyone
> understand the "official project assets" rule.
I don't disagree. And the documentation ought to speak as much to purpose
and intent as technique. When we focus on technique, as technology
changes, intent m
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> > The policy on wikis is ASF-wide. I don't believe any separate Incubator
> > policy is required.
> However, incubator is special in this regard. Adding committers and
> PPMC members needs to go through the IPMC.
How does that make the Incubator special? If you stop ty
Hi Noel,
On Mar 24, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
Based on previous discussion [1], the Tuscany PPMC has voted to grant
some some community members, with proper CLA on file, to have write
access to the Confluence wiki website. Is this NOT acceptable
anymore?
On Mar 24, 2008, at 4:45 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Craig Russell wrote:
IIRC, write access to wiki pages, distinct from write access to an
svn
repository, is not currently covered in the Incubator policy or
guides.
It is a corner case because of technology, not intent. The
Confluence-b
Luciano Resende wrote:
> From what you said, we are on the same page, and this is how it happened.
Right. I don't have any issue with what you've done, as described. I had
no one here particularly in mind when I posted the general notice. It was
actually instigated by a situation elsewhere wit
Martin Cooper wrote:
> Craig L Russell wrote:
> > IIRC, write access to wiki pages, distinct from write access to an svn
> > repository, is not currently covered in the Incubator policy or guides.
> The policy on wikis is ASF-wide. I don't believe any separate Incubator
> policy is required.
+1
Craig Russell wrote:
> IIRC, write access to wiki pages, distinct from write access to an svn
> repository, is not currently covered in the Incubator policy or guides.
It is a corner case because of technology, not intent. The
Confluence-backed web sites are outside of the technology assumptions
On 24/03/2008, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These things are my fault, I think I screwed up the last cut. We'll fix
> up the license and distro issues and get try again :-)
>
> I used:
>
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/abdera/java/branches/abdera-0.4.0-incubating/
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carl,
I understand. Please do keep up the good work and continue turning users into
devs. that's what counts end of the day
and that's what's exactly we look for in a project that's trying to get out of
incubation. We've seen so many fail
(example
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carl,
If you take a step back and think about it...this process has been
like "pulling teeth". Don't you think there's room
for all the folks on Qpid to be more open and forthcoming given this
experience?
I am sorry if t
On 3/24/08, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > IIRC, write access to wiki pages, distinct from write access to an svn
> > repository, is not currently covered in the Incubator policy or guides.
> The policy
> Btw I'm not a great fan of insinuations that people voluntarily hide their
> affiliations. If you have any material evidence then provide them,
otherwise
> I'd rather you keep those remarks for yourself.
+1
A matter of fact claim about what an affiliation appears to be is different
from a conje
Rajith Attapattu wrote:
> I am positive we are on the right track in building a vibrant community.
I don't believe that anyone is disputing that view.
> I see no reason why we shouldn't graduate.
With Rupert, possibly so ... is he really the only one independent from RH
and JPMC *today*? Are t
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> IIRC, write access to wiki pages, distinct from write access to an svn
> repository, is not currently covered in the Incubator policy or guides.
The policy on wikis is ASF-wide. I don't believe any separate Incubator
p
>From what you said, we are on the same page, and this is how it happened.
Thanks
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luciano Resende wrote:
>
> > Based on previous discussion [1], the Tuscany PPMC has voted to grant
> > some some community members, wit
IIRC, write access to wiki pages, distinct from write access to an svn
repository, is not currently covered in the Incubator policy or guides.
If nothing happens in the interim, I propose discussing this "corner
case" at the Incubator Hackathon in ApacheCon EU Amsterdam in a couple
of weeks
Luciano Resende wrote:
> Based on previous discussion [1], the Tuscany PPMC has voted to grant
> some some community members, with proper CLA on file, to have write
> access to the Confluence wiki website. Is this NOT acceptable anymore?
PMC must vote, so let's be clear on this: minimum of 3 bind
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carl,
If you take a step back and think about it...this process has been like "pulling
teeth". Don't you think there's room
for all the folks on Qpid to be more open and forthcoming given this experience?
thanks,
dims
Carl Trieloff wrote:
| Rupert
Rupert Smith wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Don't forget about me. I am a currently active Qpid committer and not
an employee of either RedHat
or JPMC. I am an independent consultant who operates through a company
called The Badger Sett Ltd.
and all my contributions to Qpid thus far have been completely
'leg
These things are my fault, I think I screwed up the last cut. We'll fix
up the license and distro issues and get try again :-)
I used:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/abdera/java/branches/abdera-0.4.0-incubating/
I haven't made the tag as its not officially released.
Dan
sebb wrote
Hi All,
As Rupert mentioned we have atleast 3 legally independent comitters.
These requirments are important, but what is more important is that the
project has done a good job in ensuring that it operates in the Apache way
and spirit.
We have excellent mentors that have guided the project and h
Which SVN tag was used to create the distribution?
On 24/03/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's not the only problem.
>
> The source zip file seems to contain quite a few odd files:
>
> derby.log
> .lock
> redo.log
> locks
> db.lck
> log.ctrl
> logmirror.ctrl
> log1.dat
>
> No
Hi Daniel,
Don't forget about me. I am a currently active Qpid committer and not
an employee of either RedHat
or JPMC. I am an independent consultant who operates through a company
called The Badger Sett Ltd.
and all my contributions to Qpid thus far have been completely
'legally' independent of t
Dear IPMC,
I´m still waiting for hadoop's answer, but IMO, I would like to
continue to discuss this.
Apache (incubator) Pig project is built on top of Hadoop, but it is
not a hadoop sub-project.
Each different concept of project has inherently different
characteristics for its domain,
so by knowi
That's not the only problem.
The source zip file seems to contain quite a few odd files:
derby.log
.lock
redo.log
locks
db.lck
log.ctrl
logmirror.ctrl
log1.dat
Not sure what all the .dat files are for. They don't look like source...
Also contains couchdb4j-0.1.2.jar which itself has some rather
25 matches
Mail list logo
