On 06/03/2008, Scott Deboy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the qpid folks who don't want to divulge their employer: are they
> working on the project as part of their employment? If so, it would
> appear we need a CCLA, correct?
I do not believe so since those employees have signed legal documen
Does ASF need proof that a transfer of intellectual property ownership
occurred?
Scott Deboy
-Original Message-
From: Robert Greig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 3:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: FW: (qpid) Diversity
On 0
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i've taken a quite look but i can't find the report page on the wiki. is
> there a page up yet?
I just set up a skeleton now, going off the Reporting Schedule on the wiki.
Yoav
-
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Needless to say, it is that time again, when Incubator Reports march towards
> their inevitable meeting with the Board.
:-)
i've taken a quite look but i can't find the report page on the wiki.
is there a page up yet?
On Thursday 06 March 2008, Martin Ritchie wrote:
> - Firstly not all work is done on trunk so purely looking at trunk is
> not a good metric
That's fair. I forgot about the work on the branches. That's a very
valid point.Updated list with branches added from Jan 1:
Alan ConwayRH
For the qpid folks who don't want to divulge their employer: are they
working on the project as part of their employment? If so, it would
appear we need a CCLA, correct?
If we don't know the committer's employer (and they're working on the
project as an employee), we can't determine if a CCLA is
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 06/03/2008, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Daniel Kulp write:
> > > a quick svn log on their SVN repo for all commits since Jan 1
> [suggests
> > that]
> >
> > > all but 4 commits since Jan 1 can easil
Dirk,
It is the first case that applies here i.e.
2. Having the employer invisible either implies one of two:
a) The employer totally does not enter into this and
the committer is acting a 100% as a private, free
individual; and his work does not pe
On 06/03/2008, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Kulp write:
> > a quick svn log on their SVN repo for all commits since Jan 1 [suggests
> that]
>
> > all but 4 commits since Jan 1 can easily be contributed to RedHat
> employees.
>
>
> > I think the above should provide enough
