Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

2008-02-11 Thread Assaf Arkin
+1 (non binding) Assaf On 2/9/08, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages > of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we > proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. > Now it is time

Re: [DISCUSS] Re-election of podling committers before graduation

2008-02-11 Thread Craig L Russell
On Feb 11, 2008, at 8:59 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Monday 04 February 2008 04:11, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: STM that something along these lines would be a more lightweight but equally effective process. we could ask the PPMC if it's pruned inactive committer

Re: [DISCUSS] Re-election of podling committers before graduation

2008-02-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Monday 04 February 2008 04:11, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: STM that something along these lines would be a more lightweight but equally effective process. we could ask the PPMC if it's pruned inactive committers from the graudation list. Personally, I don't see a diff

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

2008-02-11 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
Sam Ruby wrote: We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. Now it is time to vote on the proposal which can be found on the Apache Wiki,