Re: [PROPOSAL] Kaolin (renamed from Dimensions)

2008/2/1, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, > > On Jan 27, 2008 12:49 PM, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > 2008/1/26, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Is there interest in growing an independent Kaolin community, > > > or should the codebase perhaps just be contrib

Re: Multiple hats for members wrt a podling

Craig L Russell wrote: Hi Matt, I don't see a conflict for incubating projects when members assume multiple roles, including Champion, Mentor, and Committer. If a Champion is not a Mentor or Committer, then it's pure altruism. There's only one conflict, and the 'voting' thread hints at this.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Kaolin (renamed from Dimensions)

Hi, On Jan 27, 2008 12:49 PM, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/1/26, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Is there interest in growing an independent Kaolin community, > > or should the codebase perhaps just be contributed (with a software > > grant) as an add-on component to A

Re: Multiple hats for members wrt a podling

Hi Matt, I don't see a conflict for incubating projects when members assume multiple roles, including Champion, Mentor, and Committer. If a Champion is not a Mentor or Committer, then it's pure altruism. Craig On Jan 31, 2008, at 11:20 AM, Matt Benson wrote: I'm looking for general feedb

[PROPOSAL] i18n4data Proposal

Hello Dear incubators: I am Huang Neng Geng. I would like to post my proposal about i18n4data, an i18n tool for java web application, that I would like to be incubated. Currently I cannot find any sponsors for this project, so if anyone reading this message would like to get on board, it will be

Re: [DISCUSS] CouchDB incubator project

+1 I am interested in mentoring if needed. Ted On Jan 31, 2008, at 7:40 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: The original source for this proposal can be found at http://www.couchdbwiki.com/index.php?title=Apache_Incubator_Proposal and a current snapshot is attached below. Once we have established that t

Re: Re: [PROPOSAL] Thrift

Niclas is correct - this can create hardships, resentments, control issues in your community. If it's a simple as "we don't trust you Java folks on day one to properly indent Python code" I can sympathize with that concept. That's about the extent of what we were thinking, but there has been so m

Re: [DISCUSS] CouchDB incubator project

+1 (non binding) Very exciting to see this happening at Apache. Assaf On 1/31/08, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The original source for this proposal can be found at > > http://www.couchdbwiki.com/index.php?title=Apache_Incubator_Proposal > > and a current snapshot is attached below.

[RESULT][VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release (RC3a)

On Jan 31, 2008 2:30 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 31, 2008 10:27 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > ...ant > > > > On Jan 28, 2008 5:31 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > The previous VOTE thread here for SCA Java

Re: Multiple hats for members wrt a podling

Thanks all for the responses received so far (as well as any yet to come)! -Matt --- Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 31, 2008 2:36 PM, Jukka Zitting > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 31, 2008 9:20 PM, Matt Benson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm looking for general f

Re: [DISCUSS] CouchDB incubator project

+1. How does the license of erlang (Erlang Public License, which is a Mozilla PL derivative) affect this project? Martijn On 1/31/08, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The original source for this proposal can be found at > > http://www.couchdbwiki.com/index.php?title=Apache_Incubator_Prop

Re: Multiple hats for members wrt a podling

On Jan 31, 2008 2:36 PM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 31, 2008 9:20 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm looking for general feedback about the group's > > perception of incubated projects and the number of > > roles that may be assumed by a foundation member in >

Re: Multiple hats for members wrt a podling

Hi Matt, > I'm looking for general feedback about the group's > perception of incubated projects and the number of > roles that may be assumed by a foundation member in > one. Can I view RAT as an example that it would be > considered kosher for a member to be both champion of > and an initial co

Re: Multiple hats for members wrt a podling

Hi, On Jan 31, 2008 9:20 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm looking for general feedback about the group's > perception of incubated projects and the number of > roles that may be assumed by a foundation member in > one. I don't see a problem with people wearing many hats. I'm both

Multiple hats for members wrt a podling

I'm looking for general feedback about the group's perception of incubated projects and the number of roles that may be assumed by a foundation member in one. Can I view RAT as an example that it would be considered kosher for a member to be both champion of and an initial committer on a given pro

Re: [DISCUSS] CouchDB incubator project

+1 -- I am very excited to see this and think it will be good for CouchDB. -Brian On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The original source for this proposal can be found at > > http://www.couchdbwiki.com/index.php?title=Apache_Incubator_Proposal > > and a curren

Re: [DISCUSS] CouchDB incubator project

Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The original source for this proposal can be found at > > http://www.couchdbwiki.com/index.php?title=Apache_Incubator_Proposal > > and a current snapshot is attached below. Once we have established > that there is interest, my plan is to move this content ov

Re: "Binding" term

Erik Abele wrote: On 31.01.2008, at 13:26, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: On Jan 31, 2008, at 6:40 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: and only the PPMC member votes are binding. The error is the use of PPMC. It should say that only PMC member votes are binding. But somehow I like the fact that i

Re: [DISCUSS] CouchDB incubator project

On Jan 31, 2008, at 4:40 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: The original source for this proposal can be found at http://www.couchdbwiki.com/index.php?title=Apache_Incubator_Proposal I think this would be a fantastic addition to Apache. Would love to help, so let me know if you're interested in another m

Re: [DISCUSS] CouchDB incubator project

I volunteer to help mentor this project. Paul -- Paul Fremantle Chair, Apache Synapse PMC On Jan 31, 2008 4:29 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sounds very interesting. I'd certainly watch this project and > contribute to it if time permits. > > > On Jan 31, 2008 8:10 AM, Juk

Re: [DISCUSS] CouchDB incubator project

Sounds very interesting. I'd certainly watch this project and contribute to it if time permits. On Jan 31, 2008 8:10 AM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Jan 31, 2008 5:40 PM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The goal is to create either an Apache top level project, or

Re: [DISCUSS] CouchDB incubator project

Hi, On Jan 31, 2008 5:40 PM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The goal is to create either an Apache top level project, or a db > subproject, around the existing CouchDB open source project. Brilliant, I knew it! (see comment #3 in [1] :-) It's good so see more "semi-structured" storage sol

Re: [DISCUSS] CouchDB incubator project

On Jan 31, 2008 7:40 AM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The original source for this proposal can be found at > > http://www.couchdbwiki.com/index.php?title=Apache_Incubator_Proposal > > and a current snapshot is attached below. Once we have established that > there is interest, my plan is

[DISCUSS] CouchDB incubator project

The original source for this proposal can be found at http://www.couchdbwiki.com/index.php?title=Apache_Incubator_Proposal and a current snapshot is attached below. Once we have established that there is interest, my plan is to move this content over to wiki.apache.org/incubator as a [PROPOSA

Re: "Binding" term

On Jan 31, 2008, at 4:08 PM, Erik Abele wrote: Perhaps we need to do something like having the whole community vote and then taking this as their proposal to the PMC which then votes as to wether to pass this community advice on. Yes, we're already doing that it's just very confusing to a

Re: "Binding" term

On 31.01.2008, at 13:26, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: On Jan 31, 2008, at 6:40 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: and only the PPMC member votes are binding. The error is the use of PPMC. It should say that only PMC member votes are binding. But somehow I like the fact that in most cases the v

Re: [Proposal] NoNameYet

kelvin goodson wrote: Hi all, We've posted an Apache Incubator proposal onto the incubator wiki http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NoNameYetProposal We haven't got a good name yet, SandStorm is a contender, as is Snowdon Suggestions and comments welcome, Kelvin.

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release (RC3a)

On Jan 31, 2008 10:27 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > ...ant > > On Jan 28, 2008 5:31 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The previous VOTE thread here for SCA Java 1.1-incubating identified > some > > issues. > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/general

Re: [Proposal] NoNameYet : Link Error - please use this link

Kelvin, NoNameProposers Maybe no-one has responded yet because no-one wants to ask the hard questions! So here I go: Perhaps you can explain why this effort isn't being rolled into the Tuscany work. There are some obvious reasons why I am confused by this proposal: 1. Tuscany already has the ob

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.1-incubating (RC3a)

+1 from me (IPMC, Mentor) Paul On Jan 31, 2008 1:09 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 31, 2008 10:25 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > ...ant > > > > On Jan 27, 2008 8:17 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > A new release candidate has b

Re: "Binding" term

On Jan 31, 2008, at 6:40 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: and only the PPMC member votes are binding. The error is the use of PPMC. It should say that only PMC member votes are binding. But somehow I like the fact that in most cases the vote is much wider - and I think that this helps foste

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release (RC3a)

+1 ...ant On Jan 28, 2008 5:31 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > The previous VOTE thread here for SCA Java 1.1-incubating identified some > issues. > > http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg16483.html > > A new release candidate (RC3a) has been create

Re: "Binding" term

On Jan 31, 2008 5:40 AM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > and only the PPMC member votes are binding. > > The error is the use of PPMC. It should say that only PMC member votes > are binding. > >--- Noel > Now I'm confused. If it says "only PMC member votes are binding" doe

Re: [Proposal] NoNameYet : Link Error - please use this link

http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NoNameYetProposal That's what you get for employing reuse tactics -- gmail remembers the original URL. I've been caught by this before, so I thought I had taken appropriate action to avoid this behaviour, but sadly not so, apologies. Kelvin On 31/01/2008, kelvin

[Proposal] NoNameYet

Hi all, We've posted an Apache Incubator proposal onto the incubator wiki http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NoNameYetProposal We haven't got a good name yet, SandStorm is a contender, as is Snowdon Suggestions and comments welcome, Kelvin.