Re: Business Framework Project

2008-01-28 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Jan 29, 2008 12:13 AM, Ahmad Khalifa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, is there anything I need to know before making the source > available online? I mean, license-wise?... Licensing your code under the Apache License [1] might make it easier to incubate it later on. -Bertrand [1] http

Re: [VOTE] Approve release CXF 2.0.4-incubator

2008-01-28 Thread ant elder
I'm not sure those votes on cxf-dev count in this vote unless they vote in this thread, no mater though as there are enough votes here now. ...ant On Jan 26, 2008 5:56 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Just a quick update while the vote is open. > > Jim Jagielski and Jeff G

Re: [VOTE] Approve release CXF 2.0.4-incubator

2008-01-28 Thread ant elder
Looks ok to me, +1. ...ant On Jan 25, 2008 9:42 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > We held a vote on cxf-dev to release a new version of CXF. This version > is pretty much just a big "bug fix rollup" compared to 2.0.3 fixing over > 50 JIRA issues reported by users and bugs encou

RE: [PROPOSAL] Thrift

2008-01-28 Thread Mark Slee
Hi everyone, Unless my mail filters are playing tricks on me, haven't seen any feedback on the incubator list since sending this proposal out last week. Hopefully that's a good thing, meaning no one's opposed. =) Anyone have feedback? If no objections are voiced, when would it be appropriate for

Re: Business Framework Project

2008-01-28 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tuesday 29 January 2008 07:13, Ahmad Khalifa wrote: > Well, is there anything I need to know before making the source > available online? I mean, license-wise? Are you the only author and owns all Copyright to the material? If Yes, you have the right to license the code anyway you want. If

Re: Business Framework Project

2008-01-28 Thread Ahmad Khalifa
Alex Karasulu wrote: On Jan 26, 2008 3:50 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tuesday 22 January 2008 22:20, Ahmad Khalifa wrote: Note, The project has a working codebase. Perhaps a good first step is to make it publicly available ;o) Niclas makes an excellent point, then we can

[VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release (RC3a)

2008-01-28 Thread Simon Laws
Hi, The previous VOTE thread here for SCA Java 1.1-incubating identified some issues. http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg16483.html A new release candidate (RC3a) has been created addressing the issues as discussed in the previous thread. I'm starting this IPMC VOTE thr