> [X ] +1 Allow RAT to enter incubator, sponsored by IPMC
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 (non-binding)
Gilles
2007/10/30, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into the
> incubator
>
> - robert
>
>
> --8<-
> [ ] +1 Allow R
+1 (non binding)
Regards
Felix
Am Dienstag, den 30.10.2007, 22:03 + schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin:
> i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into the incubator
>
> - robert
>
> --8<--
On 10/30/07, Deepal jayasinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Petar Tahchiev wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > today I was looking for a Jabber server implemented entirely in Java,
> > and the only results
> > that I got was this:
> >
> > ---(free)---
> > http://www.codecobra.com/chime/
> > http://www.open
On 10/30/07, Petar Tahchiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> today I was looking for a Jabber server implemented entirely in Java,
> and the only results
> that I got was this:
>
> ---(free)---
> http://www.codecobra.com/chime/
> http://www.open-im.net/
> http://www.tigase.org/
> http://ww
On 10/30/07, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into the incubator
>
+1 (non-binding)
-Rahul
> - robert
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into the
> incubator
+1
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comman
Matthieu Riou wrote:
On 10/30/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 30, 2007, at 11:58 PM, Matthieu Riou wrote:
"there are at least 3 legally independent committers and there is no single
company or entity that is vital to the success of the project"
What does legally independe
On 10/30/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 30, 2007, at 11:58 PM, Matthieu Riou wrote:
>
> > "there are at least 3 legally independent committers and there is no
> > single
> > company or entity that is vital to the success of the project"
>
> What does legally independent m
On Oct 30, 2007, at 11:16 PM, Erik Abele wrote:
Well, usually our voting guidelines require three +1 etc. so for
example having only three committers from a single company makes
voting kind of pointless :-)
Perhaps. I know on Geronimo, and i suspect other projects as well,
that there
On Oct 30, 2007, at 11:58 PM, Matthieu Riou wrote:
"there are at least 3 legally independent committers and there is no
single
company or entity that is vital to the success of the project"
What does legally independent mean? Not paid by the same company to
work on a project? I'd be ok
On 10/30/07, Erik Abele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> So the absolute minimum should be three committers with at least two
> different entities behind them (e.g. two companies, or at least one
> independent, etc.) - OTOH I think the current rules outlined at [1]
> are perfectly fine.
I'd be f
I have the port to Plexus in a tree and I'm sure alag would be fine
with it coming along here.
On 30 Oct 07, at 8:43 AM 30 Oct 07, J Aaron Farr wrote:
"Petar Tahchiev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi guys,
today I was looking for a Jabber server implemented entirely in Java,
and the only re
+1
Niall
On Oct 30, 2007 10:03 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into the incubator
>
> - robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For ad
On 31.10.2007, at 03:54, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I didn't see a thread get started on this topic yet but I've been
mulling this over for a bit so perhaps we can continue the
discussion in this thread?
I'm not sure that there should be a hard requirement for 3, 5 or n
unique committers. As a
I didn't see a thread get started on this topic yet but I've been
mulling this over for a bit so perhaps we can continue the discussion
in this thread?
I'm not sure that there should be a hard requirement for 3, 5 or n
unique committers. As a guideline I think three is a good working
num
Hey,
On Oct 30, 2007 6:03 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into the incubator
>
> - robert
>
> --8<-
> [ X ] +1 Allow RAT to
+1
you go, rat-man.
Craig
On Oct 30, 2007, at 3:03 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into
the incubator
- robert
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PRO
+1
On Oct 30, 2007, at 6:03 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into the
incubator
- robert
--8
<
-
[ ] +1 Allow RAT to enter incubator, sp
+1--kevan
On 10/30/07, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into the
> incubator
>
> - robert
>
>
> --8<-
> [ ] +1 Allow RAT to en
J Aaron Farr wrote:
"Ting Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Now, we are going to move our project BlueSky (Blue Sky Distance
Collaboration System) to Apache Incubator for future development...
你好
The proposal is interesting, but I have a few concerns.
I can't get to http://202.117.1
"Ting Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now, we are going to move our project BlueSky (Blue Sky Distance
> Collaboration System) to Apache Incubator for future development...
你好
The proposal is interesting, but I have a few concerns.
I can't get to http://202.117.16.176/ from Hong Kong, so I
+1, binding (yeah!)
Martijn
On 10/30/07, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into the incubator
>
> - robert
>
> --8<-
> [ ] +1 Al
+1
-> richard
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into the incubator
- robert
--8<-
[ ] +1 Allow RAT to enter incubator, sponsored by IPMC
[ ] +0
[
+1 (non-binding)
--Thilo
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into the incubator
>
> - robert
>
> --8<-
> [ ] +1 Allow RAT to enter incubator, sponso
On 10/30/07, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into the
> incubator
A huge +1.
Matthieu
+1
On 30/10/2007, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following up on the proposal discussed at [1] I'd like to call for a vote to
> incubate Buildr. Buildr is a simple and intuitive build system for Java
> projects written in Ruby (and based on Rake), please see the complete
> prop
+1
On 31/10/2007, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On 10/30/07, Niklas Gustavsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > /niklas
> >
> > Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> > > i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into the
> > >
+1 (non-binding)
On 10/30/07, Niklas Gustavsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> /niklas
>
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> > i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into the
> > incubator
> >
> > - robert
> >
> > --8<--
+1 (non-binding)
/niklas
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into the incubator
- robert
--8<-
[ ] +1 Allow RAT to enter incubator, sponsored by IPM
+1 (non-binding)
On 10/30/07, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into the incubator
>
> - robert
>
> --8<-
> [ ] +1 Allow RAT to e
i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into the incubator
- robert
--8<-
[ ] +1 Allow RAT to enter incubator, sponsored by IPMC
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 Do no allow RAT to enter incubator
+1
...ant
On 10/29/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Following up on the proposal discussed at [1] I'd like to call for a vote
> to
> incubate Buildr. Buildr is a simple and intuitive build system for Java
> projects written in Ruby (and based on Rake), please see the co
+1, Buildr is excellent stuff.
/niklas
Matthieu Riou wrote:
Hi,
Following up on the proposal discussed at [1] I'd like to call for a vote to
incubate Buildr. Buildr is a simple and intuitive build system for Java
projects written in Ruby (and based on Rake), please see the complete
proposal te
+1
It will be nice to see some Ruby development here.
Craig
On Oct 29, 2007, at 2:29 PM, Matthieu Riou wrote:
Hi,
Following up on the proposal discussed at [1] I'd like to call for
a vote to
incubate Buildr. Buildr is a simple and intuitive build system for
Java
projects written in Ruby
On Oct 30, 2007, at 11:33 AM, Paul Hammant wrote:
Jim Jagielski (with some comments about muck raking - hopefully
allayed)
:)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Petar Tahchiev wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> today I was looking for a Jabber server implemented entirely in Java,
> and the only results
> that I got was this:
>
> ---(free)---
> http://www.codecobra.com/chime/
> http://www.open-im.net/
> http://www.tigase.org/
> http://www.igniterealtime.org/projects/ope
"Petar Tahchiev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi guys,
>
> today I was looking for a Jabber server implemented entirely in Java,
> and the only results
> that I got was this:
>
> ---(free)---
> http://www.codecobra.com/chime/
> http://www.open-im.net/
OpenIM was originally developed using Apache
In Favor (+1)
James Strachan
Bertrand Delacretaz
Jukka Zitting
Martijn Dashorst
Leo Simons
Davanum Srinivas
Robert Burrell Donkin
Craig L Russell
Eelco Hillenius
Matt Hogstrom
Justin Erenkrantz
J Aaron Farr
Kevan Miller (with come comments about off-list activity -
hop
today I was looking for a Jabber server implemented entirely in Java,
and the only results
that I got was this:
Not like the list you've quoted indicates scarcity in the XMPP server
space ;-)
Does anyone (besides me) think that we can build something better?
As always having an Apache-lic
Hi guys,
today I was looking for a Jabber server implemented entirely in Java,
and the only results
that I got was this:
---(free)---
http://www.codecobra.com/chime/
http://www.open-im.net/
http://www.tigase.org/
http://www.igniterealtime.org/projects/openfire/index.jsp
(commercial)---
http:
On 10/30/07, J Aaron Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Oct 29, 2007, at 5:29 PM, Matthieu Riou wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Also we're missing one more mentor so if someone could volunteer,
> >> that would
> >> really be great.
> >>
> >
> > Count me in
On 10/30/07, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 29, 2007, at 5:29 PM, Matthieu Riou wrote:
>
> >
> > Also we're missing one more mentor so if someone could volunteer,
> > that would
> > really be great.
> >
>
> Count me in.
Thanks!
> Please vote on accepting Buildr into the Ap
Cool, thanks!
Now I need to get approved ;-)
Martijn
On 10/30/07, J Aaron Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Martijn Dashorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I just sent a proposal to the apache con CFP for a presentation on
> > successful incubation.
> >
> > Unfortunately the title was sub
On Oct 30, 2007, at 9:23 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
Good to see some Ruby code coming into the foundation, even if it is
for compiling Java.
There's Ruby code under Solr:
* solr-ruby: Ruby API to Solr
* Flare: Ruby on Rails plugin using solr-ruby to present a faceted UI.
A coupl
"Martijn Dashorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just sent a proposal to the apache con CFP for a presentation on
> successful incubation.
>
> Unfortunately the title was submitted wrongly, and the apache con site
> doesn't allow editing of the title of a submitted proposal.
Cool.
I did a cou
Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Oct 29, 2007, at 5:29 PM, Matthieu Riou wrote:
>
>>
>> Also we're missing one more mentor so if someone could volunteer,
>> that would
>> really be great.
>>
>
> Count me in.
Jim beat me to it. :-)
I'll be keeping an eye on the project as well thou
[ X] +1 Accept Buildr project for incubation
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason :
I think this is a great idea. +1 from me.
Paul
On 10/30/07, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Oct 29, 2007 9:29 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [X]
On Oct 29, 2007 9:29 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [X] +1 Accept Buildr project for incubation
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason :
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Oct 29, 2007, at 5:29 PM, Matthieu Riou wrote:
Also we're missing one more mentor so if someone could volunteer,
that would
really be great.
Count me in.
Please vote on accepting Buildr into the Apache Incubator. This
vote will
run until Thursday November 1st at 3pm PST.
[X] +1 A
To second a previous message. JRuby is quite good already, and
getting better every day. Having JRuby tie to Ant's API through the
elegance of Rake would be awesome.
Erik
On Oct 29, 2007, at 7:20 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
+1
For what it is worth, I heard a lot of comments abou
+1
On Oct 29, 2007, at 5:29 PM, Matthieu Riou wrote:
Hi,
Following up on the proposal discussed at [1] I'd like to call for
a vote to
incubate Buildr. Buildr is a simple and intuitive build system for
Java
projects written in Ruby (and based on Rake), please see the complete
proposal text
52 matches
Mail list logo
