+1 (non-binding)
Gilles
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthieu Riou
> Sent: lundi 29 octobre 2007 22:30
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Accept project Buildr for incubation
>
> Hi,
>
> Following up on the propo
On 10/29/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...Following up on the proposal discussed at [1] I'd like to call for a vote
> to
> incubate Buildr...
+1
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additi
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Following up on the proposal discussed at [1] I'd like to call for a
> vote to incubate Buildr.
+1
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additiona
On 10/29/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> For what it is worth, I heard a lot of comments about buildr at a
> developer
> conference last week, and the general consensus seemed to be that it
> should
> ditch Ruby/Rake, and be rewritten to use Groovy. Java developers, it wa
On 10/29/07, Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/29/07, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > This sounds like Rake (http://rake.rubyforge.org/) to me. Is Buildr
> > just a customized Rake? How is Buildr any different than Rake?
>
>
> Buildr is Rake underneath, we started with
On 10/29/07, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This sounds like Rake (http://rake.rubyforge.org/) to me. Is Buildr
> just a customized Rake? How is Buildr any different than Rake?
Buildr is Rake underneath, we started with Rake to handle all the task and
dependency management, works ver
Hey,
On Oct 29, 2007 5:29 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please vote on accepting Buildr into the Apache Incubator. This vote will
> run until Thursday November 1st at 3pm PST.
>
> [ X ] +1 Accept Buildr project for incubation
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Reject for the following re
On Tuesday 30 October 2007 05:29, Matthieu Riou wrote:
> Please vote on accepting Buildr into the Apache Incubator.
>
[x] +1 Accept Buildr project for incubation
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason :
Cheers
Niclas
-
On 10/29/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following up on the proposal discussed at [1] I'd like to call for a vote to
> incubate Buildr. Buildr is a simple and intuitive build system for Java
> projects written in Ruby (and based on Rake), please see the complete
> proposal t
+1
For what it is worth, I heard a lot of comments about buildr at a developer
conference last week, and the general consensus seemed to be that it should
ditch Ruby/Rake, and be rewritten to use Groovy. Java developers, it was
widely claimed, don't want to have to install Ruby in order to do Jav
On 10/29/07, Erik Abele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 29.10.2007, at 16:02, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > Asking me to do something about it, is also asking at the wrong
> > end, since I
> > am a newbie at the topic and barely trust myself getting anything
> > right.
>
> Well, that's the way we op
[ x ] +1 Accept Buildr project for incubation
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason :
Eelco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
Martijn
(I'm eyeing this project for future assimilation in my build procedures)
On 10/29/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following up on the proposal discussed at [1] I'd like to call for a vote to
> incubate Buildr. Buildr is a simple and intuitive build system for Ja
Hi,
Following up on the proposal discussed at [1] I'd like to call for a vote to
incubate Buildr. Buildr is a simple and intuitive build system for Java
projects written in Ruby (and based on Rake), please see the complete
proposal text at [2] or at the end of this e-mail.
Also we're missing one
October 29, 2007 -- The Apache C++ Standard Library project is pleased
to announce that the official stdcxx 4.2.0 release is now available for
download from the following location:
http://people.apache.org/dist/incubator/stdcxx/releases/
For additional details see the stdcxx Download page:
http:/
On 29/10/2007, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Even if you can't establish a trust path, the PGP signature gives a
> > bit more assurance than a hash. The KEY file should be in SVN, so you
> > can ensure t
On 29.10.2007, at 16:02, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Monday 29 October 2007 21:26, Erik Abele wrote:
The process on the above page is beyond most users'
imagination.
As said, they probably don't even care otherwise they would know...
I rest my case; If I don't care about routing tables in TCP/
On Monday 29 October 2007 21:26, Erik Abele wrote:
> > The process on the above page is beyond most users'
> > imagination.
>
> As said, they probably don't even care otherwise they would know...
I rest my case; If I don't care about routing tables in TCP/IP stacks, I don't
need Internet, right?
The request to release stdcxx 4.2.0 has reached the required
minimum of three binding +1 votes with no other votes recorded.
Kevan Miller
Matthieu Riou
Thilo Goetz (non-binding)
William A. Rowe, Jr.
Thank you!
Martin
Martin Sebor wrote:
The stdcxx community has just successfully clos
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Even if you can't establish a trust path, the PGP signature gives a
> bit more assurance than a hash. The KEY file should be in SVN, so you
> can ensure that the person that added the key to the KEY file was at
> least a com
On 29/10/2007, Erik Abele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 29.10.2007, at 03:13, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 28 October 2007 23:15, Erik Abele wrote:
> >> As BenL always says: "I don't give a shit about some random document,
> >> that could be faked anyway. All I care about is the email ad
On 29.10.2007, at 13:49, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
...
IMO this needs to be done at the protocol level to gain the required
security (rather than just the appearance of security). if there's
anyone around who's active on HTTP standards then now would be a great
time to jump in...
And back t
On 29.10.2007, at 03:13, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Sunday 28 October 2007 23:15, Erik Abele wrote:
As BenL always says: "I don't give a shit about some random document,
that could be faked anyway. All I care about is the email address
connected to the key I intend to sign - is it really the addr
On 10/29/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 28 October 2007 23:15, Erik Abele wrote:
> > As BenL always says: "I don't give a shit about some random document,
> > that could be faked anyway. All I care about is the email address
> > connected to the key I intend to sign - is
24 matches
Mail list logo
