On Saturday 29 September 2007 00:03, Roland Weber wrote:
> Staying at Jakarta will buy some time, but won't last forever.
>
> If you have ideas on what to do with these small but active
> projects, please come over to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and share your
> thoughts.
Can't Jakarta just be revitalized a
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> Theres more of an issue IMO with projects that don't come thru the
> incubator, since they don't have to meet the Incubator's stringent
> graduation requirement. As an example - Tapestry was pushed out to a
> TLP from Jakarta,[...]
Jakarta is disintegrating. All big projec
On Sep 28, 2007, at 4:16 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On 9/27/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...So I'm wondering if as podling releases are not endorsed by the
ASF and if
the "incubating" and the disclaimer text is everywhere as required
then
could we be a little more lenient?
On Friday 28 September 2007 17:12, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> On 9/28/07, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What we care about is that podlings get the "legal stuff" right, and
> > letting releases out without this being ok is not an option, due to
> > potential legal risks.
>
> I th
On 9/28/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/28/07, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > What we care about is that podlings get the "legal stuff" right, and
> > letting releases out without this being ok is not an option, due to
> > potential legal risks.
>
> I
On 9/28/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Friday 28 September 2007 16:16, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> > IMHO the incubator PMC doesn't care much about technical issues in
> > podling releases, at least for early releases.
>
> This is an important observation. The reviewers has n
On Friday 28 September 2007 16:16, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> IMHO the incubator PMC doesn't care much about technical issues in
> podling releases, at least for early releases.
This is an important observation. The reviewers has no opportunity to figure
out if the release at all work. That is
On 9/28/07, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What we care about is that podlings get the "legal stuff" right, and
> letting releases out without this being ok is not an option, due to
> potential legal risks.
I thought projects in incubator were not endorsed by the ASF, hence
the
On Friday 28 September 2007 15:40, ant elder wrote:
> Anyway, so i'm thinking more of a benevolent educator than traffic warden
> style reviewer role.
*My* worry is that quality will drop if there is no expectations.
So we could turn this around and say; What are the expectations from the I PMC
On 9/27/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...So I'm wondering if as podling releases are not endorsed by the ASF and if
> the "incubating" and the disclaimer text is everywhere as required then
> could we be a little more lenient? Maybe just note any issues so they can be
> fixed in the n
On 9/28/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Friday 28 September 2007 05:12, Yoav Shapira wrote:
>
> > Personally, that's my take on it, and what I've done historically.
>
> I agree with Yoav, but would like to add that I personally have different
> standards for different podlings,
11 matches
Mail list logo
