On Tuesday 25 September 2007 04:18, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> this is probably just an indication that it's time to starting thinking...
+1 to all said.
Do we have any examples where corporate backing has been withdrawn, and how
the project was affected, whether inside or outside ASF?
It
Olga Natkovich wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PigProposal.
We would like to ask that the ASF consider forming a podling according to
the proposal.
Thanks for all the comments. I've seen no issues raised that should
block Pig from entering incubation. Unless something arises before
On 9/24/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm just going to delete the javadocs for that module. The rest of the
> modules use the remote-resources correctly so they should be OK. The
> only class in there is a utility pluin thing into maven used to create
> the bundle and not part
I'm just going to delete the javadocs for that module. The rest of the
modules use the remote-resources correctly so they should be OK. The
only class in there is a utility pluin thing into maven used to create
the bundle and not part of the "public api" stuff anyway.
Next release I'll eit
On 9/22/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Due to some license issues pointed out from Kevan and Matthieu as well as
> some TCK failures when run in Geronimo and the bouncycastle discussions,
> we had to rebuild CXF 2.0.2.
looks like that maven javadoc license issues isn't completely f
On 9/24/07, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > In other words, if the corporate support
> > of the project or podling went away, would they stop
> > developing and working on the codebase because they,
> > after all, had no allegiance in the code at all? Were
> > the
I don't find the name provocative either, but the connotations are a
bit weird :-P
On Sep 24, 2007, at 10:39 AM, "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Doug Cutting wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
a) The name "Pig" is somewhat provocative (not kosher/halal) and I
would like to hear t
Doug Cutting wrote:
> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>> a) The name "Pig" is somewhat provocative (not kosher/halal) and I
>> would like to hear the rationale behind the name, and whether there
>> are any willingness to look for another name.
>
> It is not meant to be provocative. It is named after the an
We could add rules indefinitely to make just about anyone not usable...
I don't have any issues
with Pig.
Carl.
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hey,
On 9/24/07, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
a) The name "Pig" is somewhat provocative (not kosher/halal) and I w
The Apache Tuscany team are delighted to announce the 1.0 release of
the Java SCA project.
Apache Tuscany provides a runtime environment based on the Service
Component Architecture (SCA). SCA is a set of specifications aimed at
simplifying SOA application development. These specifications are
bein
Hey,
On 9/24/07, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > a) The name "Pig" is somewhat provocative (not kosher/halal) and I would
> > like
> > to hear the rationale behind the name, and whether there are any willingness
> > to look for another name.
>
> It is not meant
Actually we would really like to modify Ruby and Python to support Pig Latin
as part of the language: Ubyray and Ythonpay. We have avoided creating our
own crippled scripting language, there are just too many in the world, and
instead hope to take an existing language and and embedded Pig Latin
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
+1 to the proposal, and I'd be happy to help as a mentor.
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
I'd be happy to be a mentor too.
Thanks! Please feel free to add yourself to the proposal.
Doug
-
To unsubscribe,
Doug Cutting wrote:
> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > a) The name "Pig" is somewhat provocative (not kosher/halal) and I
> > would like to hear the rationale behind the name, and whether there
> > are any willingness to look for another name.
> It is not meant to be provocative. It is named after the
Jim Jagielski wrote:
In other words, if the corporate support
of the project or podling went away, would they stop
developing and working on the codebase because they,
after all, had no allegiance in the code at all? Were
they, in effect, coders-for-hire?
Yes, this is a known risk, perhaps the
On Sep 24, 2007, at 8:22 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Speaking just for myself, I find the name unusual but not offensive
or even provocative. The fact that you wouldn't eat an animal
doesn't mean you deny its existence...
+1
I find it a fun name, and the one unlikely to infringe on the
exi
On 9/24/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Speaking just for myself, I find the name unusual but not offensive
> or even provocative. The fact that you wouldn't eat an animal doesn't
> mean you deny its existence...
And they make good pets in many cultures and are generally
acknowled
Speaking just for myself, I find the name unusual but not offensive
or even provocative. The fact that you wouldn't eat an animal doesn't
mean you deny its existence...
Of course, I thought the language was officially called igpay atinlay.
Craig
On Sep 24, 2007, at 10:15 AM, Doug Cutting wr
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
a) The name "Pig" is somewhat provocative (not kosher/halal) and I would like
to hear the rationale behind the name, and whether there are any willingness
to look for another name.
It is not meant to be provocative. It is named after the animal and is
not an acronym. I
David L Kaminsky wrote:
All,
I updated the proposal to include the new proposed project name. Imperius
seems
to be cleaner than the alternatives.
I also added the references to the DMTF's IP policy.
Please let me know if there are more questions. (Please CC
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Thanks, David
Brian McCallister wrote:
On Sep 17, 2007, at 5:57 AM, David L Kaminsky wrote:
Tomcat
-
We're open to suggestions regarding the order in which we add
bindings to
APIs, and doing such bindings isn't terribly hard. If Tomcat is
particularly critical as an early demonstration, we ca
Congratulations!
Paul
On 9/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/21/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The Tuscany project requests permission of the IPMC to release the Java SCA
> > 1.0-incubating release.
> >
> > The SVN tag for the release is:
> > https://svn.apa
On Sep 24, 2007, at 4:44 AM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Olga Natkovich wrote:
Hi,
Yahoo! research and development teams have developed a proposal
below. The
proposal is also available on wiki at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PigProposal.
We would like to ask that the ASF consider forming a p
I am a +1 on the proposal, but I am still unclear, at
this point, how Y! is going to align the open source aspects
of Pig with their hiring push for Pig developers as per:
http://research.yahoo.com/project/pig
I guess this is more a general concern about the changing dynamics.
First, of cour
On 9/21/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Tuscany project requests permission of the IPMC to release the Java SCA
> 1.0-incubating release.
>
> The SVN tag for the release is:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.0-RC3a/
>
> The artifacts are available f
I think so as well so it still has my +1.
...ant
On 9/23/07, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes I also looked at this, and I believe its enough that they fixed it
> for the next release.
>
> Here is my +1
>
> Paul
>
> On 9/23/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/
Olga Natkovich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yahoo! research and development teams have developed a proposal below. The
> proposal is also available on wiki at
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PigProposal.
> We would like to ask that the ASF consider forming a podling according to
> the proposal.
>
High
27 matches
Mail list logo
