Jim and I discussed it a bit since it came in "right around" the 48
hour limit (and the huge Incubator report is definitely sensitive to
that timing restriction). Since the report will effectively have a
couple days for people to review it, then it seemed fine, and I told
Jim that I'd accept it (as
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 9/17/07, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This was past our 48hour cutoff and, as is usually the case
>> for the Incubator reports, pretty long. You are the shep for
>> the Incubator this month. I am leaning towards not accepting
>> this but if, as shepherd,
On 9/17/07, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This was past our 48hour cutoff and, as is usually the case
> for the Incubator reports, pretty long. You are the shep for
> the Incubator this month. I am leaning towards not accepting
> this but if, as shepherd, you feel comfortable with it
>
Ben Hyde wrote:
> On Sep 17, 2007, at 7:31 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> Why on the private list? Why wouldn't a discussion like that be part
>> of the public dev list?
>
> My choice, possibly wrong. That said, I'd be surprised if any choice to
> redouble or shelf would be made without a round of disc
> +1 Matthieu Riou
Binding. Matthieu was elected to the PMC recently.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sep 17, 2007, at 7:31 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
Why on the private list? Why wouldn't a discussion like that be part
of the public dev list?
My choice, possibly wrong. That said, I'd be surprised if any choice
to redouble or shelf would be made without a round of discussion in
the public li
Why on the private list? Why wouldn't a discussion like that be part
of the public dev list?
On 9/17/07, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 17, 2007, at 9:31 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > === TripleSoup ===
> >
> > Did not report.
>
> Ouch, sorry. .
>
> > TripleSoup entered Incubation
Hi Dave,
On Sep 17, 2007, at 1:53 PM, Dave wrote:
I will go ahead and submit the mailing list and subversion space
requests to the Infrastructure JIRA. I'll take a look at the latest
Incubator docs first and Roller's old request as an example before I
do that.
What else should we be doing now
On Sep 17, 2007, at 9:31 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
=== TripleSoup ===
Did not report.
Ouch, sorry. .
TripleSoup entered Incubation in February 2007.
TripleSoup is intended to provide an RDF store, tooling to work
with that
database, and a REST web interface to talk to that database using
Greg,
This was past our 48hour cutoff and, as is usually the case
for the Incubator reports, pretty long. You are the shep for
the Incubator this month. I am leaning towards not accepting
this but if, as shepherd, you feel comfortable with it
being added, I will defer to your judgement.
On Sep 1
Thank you for your vote of confidence. We shall endeavour to be
worth your trust! :-)
/Janne
On 17 Sep 2007, at 23:53, Dave wrote:
On 9/12/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are we ready to incubate?
Time to sum up the vote:
Votes:
+1 Matthieu Riou
+1 Alexey Petrenko
+1 Ma
On 9/12/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are we ready to incubate?
Time to sum up the vote:
Votes:
+1 Matthieu Riou
+1 Alexey Petrenko
+1 Martijn Dashorst
Binding votes:
+1 Craig Russell
+1 Noel Bergman
+1 Henri Yandell
+1 Nicolas Hedman
+1 Ted Husted
+1 Dave Johnson
+1 Jukka Z
The DMTF patent policy is here:
http://www.dmtf.org/about/policies/patent-10-18-01.pdf
The DMTF does not have any IP in any of its specs and
unless DMTF is explicitly notified of such, neither do any of
the members.
-- mark
Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for the clarifications.
On
The Incubator enjoyed another nice quiet month. Busy, but no confliects or
problems. A few more new PMC Members were added, and a more couple people
stepped up as Mentors. The recommendation to have at least 3 Mentors per
project, although not universally implemented, appears to be having the
de
Thanks Craig (and Mark). I'll add the references.
David
Craig L Russell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
n.COM>
Hi Mark,
Thanks for that. I also found other documents on the site [1] to be
relevant, in particular the cover page of [2].
I have no further issues with the IP aspect of this proposal, and
suggest that references to [1] and [2] and [3] be included in the
updated proposal to head off futu
On Sep 16, 2007, at 11:20 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
I wasn't involved in the forking of the code. However, it is my
understanding that we only forked the bare minimum function
(ASN1.codec) that Geronimo required. So, very likely that our code
would not suit the needs of other projects.
Hi David,
Thanks for the clarifications.
On Sep 17, 2007, at 5:57 AM, David L Kaminsky wrote:
On the standard itself, not surprisingly, the DMTF encourages
implementations, and at submission, the DMTF requires this text:
"Permission to copy, display, perform, modify and distribute the
specifi
The Apache Abdera project is ready to let loose it's 0.3.0-incubating
release. The 0.3.0 branch was created a couple of weeks ago and has
since undergone a solid review by both committers and users. A number
of issues were identified and fixed. The current candidate zips have
received the requisi
Thanks for the quick response on the SPL proposal. I've tried to gather
the questions and respond to them in one e-mail. Please me know if I
missed anything.
David
Naming
-
Seems like the consensus is that SPL isn't a good name. We'll find
another. (Not sure I could get IBM t
Please be aware that rebuilding the jar means that it is no longer
signed and does not work as a security provider.
Ff you want to use the bouncycastle security provider and this
recompiled jar in the same application, you will get clashes. Class
Loader fun. The whole monty. :-)
The cleanest solu
21 matches
Mail list logo
