RE: [Vote Result] Accept Sanselan for Incubation

2007-09-08 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Carsten, I have setup the initial ACL (you) and SVN should be ready for use. I expect that the Mentors are working with the as yet non-ASF folks to take care of CLAs, etc. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO

Joining the PMC (was: [PROPOSAL] JSPWiki)

2007-09-08 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Dave Johnson wrote: > Yes! I'd like to sign up for the Incubator project and Infra to help out. OK, I want to be clear, and then I'll get the process done. You are asking to join the Incubator PMC, and volunteering as a Mentor for JSPWiki? The infrastructure side of your offer is best addressed

RE: [PROPOSAL] JSPWiki

2007-09-08 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> We have all but one tracked down and all have already agreed. > The question is whether they need to sign CLAs or whether it > is just enough that they verbally in an email agree to the > license change. If they want to continue development, they must sign a CLA. If they just want to grant lice

RE: [PROPOSAL] JSPWiki

2007-09-08 Thread Noel J. Bergman
In general, if there are any questions about IP and/or licensing, you can check with the PMC, and we can go to the Legal Committee. > Also, things like JavaMail libraries are highly useful for our user > experience (e.g. sending email in case the user forgets his > password). If there is an Apach

RE: [PROPOSAL] JSPWiki

2007-09-08 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: > these concerns are very valid and good and Janne has demonstrated that > he is aware of this. > However, most of the vetting required is actually *part* of the > incubation process and happens after acceptance into the incubator. > So can we just postpone that disc

Re: [PROPOSAL] JSPWiki

2007-09-08 Thread Alexey Petrenko
+1 2007/8/30, Janne Jalkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello all! > > I am Janne Jalkanen, the lead developer of the open source wiki > engine called JSPWiki, and I have a proposal for your enjoyment. > This proposal is available in the web at http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/ > ApacheJSPWikiProposal, sho

Re: [PROPOSAL] JSPWiki

2007-09-08 Thread Martijn Dashorst
On 9/8/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1. The fact that Janne pointed to a web page listing all the potential > hazards, is a VERY GOOD sign that he has at least as good grip of the > situation as the average Java project at Apache. And definitely good enough > for me to start incu

Re: Blue Sky Distance Collaboration System_Proposal Draft

2007-09-08 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Saturday 08 September 2007 10:20, t.peng.dev wrote: > According to official web site of ffmpeg,   > http://ffmpeg.mplayerhq.hu/faq.html#TOC9 > only when |/liba52/ component is compiled in ffmpeg, it is licensed > under GPL, otherwise > its license is LGPL. > > In BSDCS, /liba52 /is not used. So,

Re: [PROPOSAL] JSPWiki

2007-09-08 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Saturday 08 September 2007 17:41, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: > these concerns are very valid and good and Janne has demonstrated that > he is aware of this. > > However, most of the vetting required is actually *part* of the > incubation process and happens after acceptance into the incubator

Re: [PROPOSAL] JSPWiki

2007-09-08 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
Folks, these concerns are very valid and good and Janne has demonstrated that he is aware of this. However, most of the vetting required is actually *part* of the incubation process and happens after acceptance into the incubator. So can we just postpone that discussion a bit and assimilate them