Carsten,
I have setup the initial ACL (you) and SVN should be ready for use. I
expect that the Mentors are working with the as yet non-ASF folks to take
care of CLAs, etc.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
Dave Johnson wrote:
> Yes! I'd like to sign up for the Incubator project and Infra to help out.
OK, I want to be clear, and then I'll get the process done. You are asking
to join the Incubator PMC, and volunteering as a Mentor for JSPWiki?
The infrastructure side of your offer is best addressed
> We have all but one tracked down and all have already agreed.
> The question is whether they need to sign CLAs or whether it
> is just enough that they verbally in an email agree to the
> license change.
If they want to continue development, they must sign a CLA. If they just
want to grant lice
In general, if there are any questions about IP and/or licensing, you can
check with the PMC, and we can go to the Legal Committee.
> Also, things like JavaMail libraries are highly useful for our user
> experience (e.g. sending email in case the user forgets his
> password). If there is an Apach
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> these concerns are very valid and good and Janne has demonstrated that
> he is aware of this.
> However, most of the vetting required is actually *part* of the
> incubation process and happens after acceptance into the incubator.
> So can we just postpone that disc
+1
2007/8/30, Janne Jalkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello all!
>
> I am Janne Jalkanen, the lead developer of the open source wiki
> engine called JSPWiki, and I have a proposal for your enjoyment.
> This proposal is available in the web at http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/
> ApacheJSPWikiProposal, sho
On 9/8/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1. The fact that Janne pointed to a web page listing all the potential
> hazards, is a VERY GOOD sign that he has at least as good grip of the
> situation as the average Java project at Apache. And definitely good enough
> for me to start incu
On Saturday 08 September 2007 10:20, t.peng.dev wrote:
> According to official web site of ffmpeg,
> http://ffmpeg.mplayerhq.hu/faq.html#TOC9
> only when |/liba52/ component is compiled in ffmpeg, it is licensed
> under GPL, otherwise
> its license is LGPL.
>
> In BSDCS, /liba52 /is not used. So,
On Saturday 08 September 2007 17:41, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> these concerns are very valid and good and Janne has demonstrated that
> he is aware of this.
>
> However, most of the vetting required is actually *part* of the
> incubation process and happens after acceptance into the incubator
Folks,
these concerns are very valid and good and Janne has demonstrated that
he is aware of this.
However, most of the vetting required is actually *part* of the
incubation process and happens after acceptance into the incubator. So
can we just postpone that discussion a bit and assimilate them
10 matches
Mail list logo