Couldn't this kind of things be checked by RAT?
Also, the crypto.html [1] page is not very referenced. And it is easy
to not see it. Couldn't it be referenced more clearly from one of the
guideline/policies document, so that that new poddling project are
more directly aware of it.
[1] http://ww
On 8/16/07, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just found [1], and I was wonderiing if we don't fall under the
> definition of ECCN 5D002 for our binary distribution with deps. In
> this distribution we include binaries that support https, sft and ssh (and
> maybe other via vfs).
If yo
On 8/15/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
>...ant
>
> On 8/13/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The Apache Tuscany project request IPMC permission to release the Java
> > DAS beta1 (1.0-incubating-beta1). The vote thread is here ...
> >
> >http://www.mail-
On 8/16/07, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just found [1], and I was wonderiing if we don't fall under the
> definition of ECCN 5D002 for our binary distribution with deps. In
> this distribution we include binaries that support https, sft and ssh (and
> maybe other via vfs).
>
>
We have on the ivy-dev mailing a question for which we requires some help.
Since I'm subscribed to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list I have never
seen this subject aborded.
Thanks for your advices
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 16 août 20
The UIMA developers ask the Incubator PMC for permission to
publish a new release of UIMA, the second in the incubator.
This release contains many incremental changes and
improvements, please see the release notes for an exhaustive
list.
We held a vote on uima-dev that resulted in 5 binding +1s
(a
