On Jun 25, 2007, at 4:53 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
I just finished
a sweep through our sources and updated those that still needed
it. The record of the changes is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-457
So, does this mean that there's files in any of the tarballs
I have fixed the LICENSE with the missing informations
and redeployed a release to the same staging area.
Hopefully we will find a better way to handle the license informations
(I've seen some generated informations using maven) for the next major
release and fix the generated license files somehow
Hi,
On 6/22/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Even issues raised by board/IPMC have been addressed quickly and
sufficiently. (The issue with two-classes of CTR and RTC committers is
resolved, while The "Committers in italics do not have a signed Contributor
License Agreement o
Leo Simons wrote:
On Jun 23, 2007, at 10:06 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
I also believe/hope the status file might need an update or perhaps two:
In progress
Check and make sure that the files that have been donated have
been updated to reflect the new ASF copyrig
--- robert burrell donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/25/07, Martijn Dashorst
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > From an incubator point of view, I think having
> the sources available
> > is not yet necessary. Having a clear proposal what
> the project is
> > going to do, and who is goin
On 6/25/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/25/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From an incubator point of view, I think having the sources available
> is not yet necessary. Having a clear proposal what the project is
> going to do, and who is going to do
On 6/25/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From an incubator point of view, I think having the sources available
is not yet necessary. Having a clear proposal what the project is
going to do, and who is going to do it is more important, especially
with a third party donation. I thin
This one is mainly for fixes on existing metadata.
The one for uploading new artifacts is available at
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD
See also the instructions available at:
http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-central-repository-upload.html
Cheers,
Guillaume
Guillaume Nod
Preferred userid: ... agrove
Full name:... Andrew Grove
Forwarding email address: ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requested UNIX groups: ws-tuscany
CLA is on file.
Vote: http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg13754.html
Note, I believe I'm authorised to make this requ
Sorry.
Here it is: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV
kelvin goodson wrote:
> Hi Guillame,
> thanks for the tip. Could you post the reference [1] that you
> referred to please?
>
> Regards, Kelvin.
>
> On 25/06/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think you can just create a JIRA
Hi Guillame,
thanks for the tip. Could you post the reference [1] that you
referred to please?
Regards, Kelvin.
On 25/06/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think you can just create a JIRA at [1] so that your dependencies
will be uploaded in the public repository.
The public mav
I think you can just create a JIRA at [1] so that your dependencies
will be uploaded in the public repository.
The public maven repository is handled by the maven guys.
I guess another way is to make an archive of your local repository
and store it in a publicly available location so that one can
How can an Apache project robustly handle the situation where 3rd
party dependencies don't provide maven binary artifacts? In
particular, when an Apache release is made, we need to be sure that
the 3rd party dependencies are available for as long as the release is
available.
Regards, Kelvin.
-
From an incubator point of view, I think having the sources available
is not yet necessary. Having a clear proposal what the project is
going to do, and who is going to do it is more important, especially
with a third party donation. I think we should focus more on diversity
of the community rath
+1.. If the source is a big problem for people, maybe putting it in your home
(not on in
public_html) and set appropriate group rights so people can get to it by ssh.
I don't have a problem with not having access to the sources yet though..
Mvgr,
Martin
Phil Steitz wrote:
> This is a proposal to
2007/6/24, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
---
Java Resource Simulator (JRS) Proposal
The following is a proposal for a new top-level project within the ASF.
Abstract
-
The Java Resource Simula
16 matches
Mail list logo
