On 6/24/07, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is this a legal issue (you need clearance) or just a matter of "well,
there are a bazillion of wrong/strange/bad license headers with (C)'s
inside that we want to clean up first and need time"?
We have clearance to execute a code gr
Is this a legal issue (you need clearance) or just a matter of "well,
there are a bazillion of wrong/strange/bad license headers with (C)'s
inside that we want to clean up first and need time"?
Best regards
Henning
On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 14:28 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> O
On 6/24/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What have others done to workaround the bootstrapping problem for code
> that is currently internally licensed / restricted distribution before
> the proposal is accepted and a grant can be executed?
My understanding is that whether projec
What have others done to workaround the bootstrapping problem for code
that is currently internally licensed / restricted distribution before
the proposal is accepted and a grant can be executed?
My understanding is that whether projects get accepted for incubation
don't have to do much with the
On 6/24/07, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 24, 2007, at 8:24 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> This is a proposal to develop a Java-based interface response
> capture/playback tool.
Interesting proposal. Seems useful.
> Documentation
> -
> Documentation is available on
On Jun 24, 2007, at 8:24 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
This is a proposal to develop a Java-based interface response
capture/playback tool.
Interesting proposal. Seems useful.
Documentation
-
Documentation is available on request. See below.
Initial source
-
Unti
Sounds like a good proposal. I'm +1 on this. I'd also be happy to help
out. It could certainly be useful addition to Synapse as well. Looks
like you have enough mentors, but if at any time you need mentoring
help I'll also be willing to do that.
Paul
On 6/24/07, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a new release
of CXF.
The thread is at:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cxf-dev/200706.mbox/<200706192102.03935.dkulp%40apache.org>
In summary, we have 17 +1 votes, no 0 or -1 votes. Breakdown:
1 mentor/IPMC: jstrachan
1 ASF m
This is definitely interesting... one of the components in Java Web
Parts[1] is a filter[2] that records incoming requests. Along with that
is an application[3] that can take the output file from this filter and
"play it back", which can be used as a poor man's load testing tool.
I'm wondering
My only concern is with the name, which is surprisingly and
unfortunately similar to JSR. When I saw the acronym I immediately
thought you were proposing a new Java TM Specification Request.
Actually, if you google java jrs you find things like this: "This
project consists in a java JRS-168
Big +1. That kind of tool I would have needed a few months ago... :-)
Best regards
Henning
On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 11:24 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Java Resource Simulator (JRS) Proposal
[...]
-
To un
This is a proposal to develop a Java-based interface response
capture/playback tool. The full proposal is here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JrsProposal
Comments and questions are welcome. We are by no means wedded to the
name "JRS" and have not yet done name searches, etc. If there are
c
On Jun 23, 2007, at 10:06 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
I also believe/hope the status file might need an update or
perhaps two:
In progress
Check and make sure that the files that have been donated have
been updated to reflect the new ASF copyright.
I'd hope that
13 matches
Mail list logo
