Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
>> diversity is increasing (we wish it were broader, but I suspect this
>> project with the visibility of full ASF status will attract additional
>> committers who might have been hedging their bets on whether or not
>> the project would survi
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> diversity is increasing (we wish it were broader, but I suspect this
> project with the visibility of full ASF status will attract additional
> committers who might have been hedging their bets on whether or not
> the project would survive incubation.)
What effect do
[How's that for optimism? please not corrected stdcxx-dev list address]
I'm including general in this thread to give the incubator community
some small insight into stdcxx's efforts and next steps to graduate.
As far as I can see there are no remaining obstacles.
http://incubator.apache.org/s
I'm including general in this thread to give the incubator community
some small insight into stdcxx's efforts and next steps to graduate.
As far as I can see there are no remaining obstacles.
http://incubator.apache.org/stdcxx/
is of a caliber higher than expected in open source efforts, the
On 6/17/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/14/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1 anyone have any alternative/improvements?
2 any volunteers for the creation of the logo art?
I could throw a couple of cycles at it... but needs to wait until I am
back in offic
Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/06/2007 09:47:21:
> I already saw many different opinions on what to do with this project,
> so I think we should clearly understand who is interested and in what
> roles (discussion only/ write code / test code / use the library).
>
> As an example
Trustin Lee wrote:
> On 6/20/07, Brian Wellington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Trustin Lee wrote:
>> > Our primary goal is not about forking dnsjava. I think it's our last
>> > resort. Especially, I appreciate your effort to maintain dnsjava
>> > project as a previous user and a fan. With a big
+1 (binding :))
On 6/20/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We just received confirmation that the Board has established Apache
Wicket as a project.
I would like to thank the Incubator PMC and all the others that have
supported Wicket during the incubation for their guidance, effo
Gilles Scokart wrote:
>
> It solve your problem of IPMC not being able to participate/follow
> PPMC private discusion An other benefits is that the PPMC will learn
> from their own private discussion, but also from the discussion of
> other PPMC.
There is no issue. Members have access to every p
