Many thanks to Robert for pulling together the draft today while my laptop
was dead.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache Incubator Project Monthly Report
The PMC recommends that Wicket is ready to graduate as a top level
project.
Progress has been made on clarifying policy and on improving the guidance
documentation. The main focus has been on the graduation guide. It has been
good to see the involvement of
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> each podling is reminded to provide the full round of
> information to the board, as previously requested.
What items do you (the Board) want, other than:
- Steps required for graduation
- a short synopsis of what the podling does
- date entered the Incubator
The latte
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Leo Simons wrote:
> > > This scheduling stuff keeps confusing me. My own calendar says next
> > > month.
> > A frequent if not constant problem. I keep complaining about the
problem
> > of redundant and often incorrect
On 6/18/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
> This scheduling stuff keeps confusing me. My own calendar says next
> month.
A frequent if not constant problem. I keep complaining about the problem
of
redundant and often incorrect meta-data. To resolve it, I'm cons
On 6/18/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> noel is having hardware issues and he's asked me to pull this together
so
> it's likely to be a little late
Back online now ... until the service tech shows up tomorrow to replace
the
motherboard, fan, and ke
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> noel is having hardware issues and he's asked me to pull this together so
> it's likely to be a little late
Back online now ... until the service tech shows up tomorrow to replace the
motherboard, fan, and keyboard.
> we could *really* do with one more reviewer
+1
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> we probably need to dive into reporting as the next subject for improved
> definition and documentation
Yes. As I just posted to Leo, we probably need a template for the report.
- robert
-
To u
Leo Simons wrote:
> This scheduling stuff keeps confusing me. My own calendar says next
> month.
A frequent if not constant problem. I keep complaining about the problem of
redundant and often incorrect meta-data. To resolve it, I'm considering
deleting the schedules from the Wiki entirely, and
On 6/18/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did a review just now..
thanks
just before i cut the final version :-)
- robert
Did a review just now..
Mvgr,
Martin
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 6/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> This is due to board@ with PMC oversight/feedback 12 hours from now.
>
>
> noel is having hardware issues and he's asked me to pull this together so
> it's likel
Hi Robert,
On Jun 18, 2007, at 5:29 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 6/9/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 8, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> We subsequently changed the bootstrap process. I'd have to go back
> to the
> archives, but late October 2006, I b
On 6/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is due to board@ with PMC oversight/feedback 12 hours from now.
noel is having hardware issues and he's asked me to pull this together so
it's likely to be a little late
Oversight implies at least three reviewers of each report
On 6/17/07, Petar Tahchiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/17/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i think it's been stripped by the mailing list. could you attach it to a
> JIRA...?
>
> - robert
>
Really sorry for that. :-\
no problem at all - most lists at apache stri
there was quite a bit of discussion about suitable wording. i'm not sure
that a consensus was reached. there isn't any reason why we have to settle
on any one particular set of words: we can as easily approve a set of
alternative designs. so, i think it best to come up with a short list of
reasona
On 6/9/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 8, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> We subsequently changed the bootstrap process. I'd have to go back
> to the
> archives, but late October 2006, I believe.
I'd like to see where this process was incorporated into a chan
a lot of work has been put into
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html over the last few months
and i think that it's just about good enough now to promote it from DRAFT
status and creates links to it from the main documentation indexes.
so please review and either post comments or ju
On 6/15/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/15/07, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Many reports are lacking such info as "Steps required
> for graduation" and a short synopsis of what the podling
> does. If the Mentors could ensure the valid format that
> would be gre
On Jun 18, 2007, at 7:13 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
This is due to board@ with PMC oversight/feedback 12 hours from now.
Oversight implies at least three reviewers of each report.
According to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule and
already recorded in http://wiki.apache.org/
Hi,
On 6/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tika (scheduled July in ReportingSchedule)
Tika is still doing the first three monthly reports and will switch to
the normal quarterly schedule next month.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
Wicket was removed prior to its graduation, probably best to add it
until the final vote has been cast. I'll add Wicket to the schedule
again. (we were due in june)
Martijn
On 6/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is due to board@ with PMC oversight/feedback 12 hours fro
21 matches
Mail list logo
