Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

2007-05-31 Thread Martin Sebor
Craig L Russell wrote: Hi Martin, On May 30, 2007, at 11:07 AM, Martin Sebor wrote: Craig L Russell wrote: [...] So IMHO, best practice for podlings is to hold a [DISCUSS] Joe Bleau for committer on the PPMC private list, followed by a [VOTE] on the PPMC private list, and then a formal [VOTE

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

2007-05-31 Thread Dion Gillard
Speaking of being unnecessarily hostile and confrontational, thanks for bagging Jakarta. FWIW, The most recent Jakarta committer votes have been conducted in private, and what you describe is not a current Jakarta practice. Where are Noel's comments about bad Jakarta practice? I had a quick look

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

2007-05-31 Thread Dan Diephouse
As this seems to be an evolving Best Practice, I don't know that when started a vote recently on two new committers for CXF that all of this was apparent to me at the time. The current documentation at least http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html seems to indicate that we just need a net pos

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

2007-05-31 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Craig L Russell wrote: > Hi Bill, > > On May 30, 2007, at 11:37 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >> Craig L Russell wrote: >>> >>> o The podling's developer list, with notice posted to the Incubator >>> general list. The notice is a separate email forwarding the vote email >>> with a cover state

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

2007-05-31 Thread Craig L Russell
Hi Martin, On May 30, 2007, at 11:07 AM, Martin Sebor wrote: Craig L Russell wrote: [...] So IMHO, best practice for podlings is to hold a [DISCUSS] Joe Bleau for committer on the PPMC private list, followed by a [VOTE] on the PPMC private list, and then a formal [VOTE] on the private inc

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

2007-05-31 Thread Craig L Russell
Hi Bill, On May 30, 2007, at 11:37 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Craig L Russell wrote: o The podling's developer list, with notice posted to the Incubator general list. The notice is a separate email forwarding the vote email with a cover statement that this vote is underway on the podl

[RESULT][VOTE] Approve Tuscany Java SCA 0.90 release

2007-05-31 Thread ant elder
After more than 72 hours this vote has passed with 3 +1s from: Robert Burrell Donkin Davanum Srinivas Paul Fremantle Thanks for voting, ...ant

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

2007-05-31 Thread Martin Sebor
Craig L Russell wrote: [...] So IMHO, best practice for podlings is to hold a [DISCUSS] Joe Bleau for committer on the PPMC private list, followed by a [VOTE] on the PPMC private list, and then a formal [VOTE] on the private incubator PMC list with references to the discussion and vote of the P