robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 5/28/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just a friendly reminder. We're missing anoter IPMC vote ...
>
> issues
> ---
>
> i think that apache-servicemix-3.1.1-incubating.tar.gz has some
> libraries in lib that are missing their LICENSE/NOTICE
On 5/28/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/28/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. Suggesting that the prospective PMC chair keep the board meeting
> schedule in mind (subject to change but well-documented);
What is a good time to send it? Too early: it might get
On 5/28/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just a friendly reminder. We're missing anoter IPMC vote ...
issues
---
i think that apache-servicemix-3.1.1-incubating.tar.gz has some
libraries in lib that are missing their LICENSE/NOTICE entries (eg
howl, jencks)
apache-servicemi
The Apache ODE 1.0 release has been approved by 4 +1 binding votes:
Davanum Srivanas
Paul Fremantle
Sanjiva Weeravana
Robert Burrell Donkin)
In addition 5 +1 non binding votes (ODE committers) have been recorded on
ode-dev. There were no 0 or -1 votes. I'm declaring this release approved
and wil
I'll remember that for the next release. Thanks for the clarification!
Matthieu
On 5/28/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/28/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "When a distribution contains code under several licenses, the LICENSE
file
> should contain details o
On 5/22/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have uploaded a version of ServiceMix 3.1.1 in the standard repo
for you to review. See
http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/servicemix-311.html
for the future download page and release notes (these are also included in
the
distribution).
On 5/28/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 5/28/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've created a schedule for graduation:
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/dashorst/517816086/
>
> Is this accurate, and can it be used in the graduation guide? Comments
> are welcome!
On 5/18/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've posted a new RC addressing all the issues you've mentioned. The only
gotcha is with the SQL files, these come from Quartz (Open Symphony project,
Apache 2.0 license). So for these I've just added a short note pointing to
the NOTICE, which
Hi,
On 5/28/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've created a schedule for graduation:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dashorst/517816086/
Is this accurate, and can it be used in the graduation guide? Comments
are welcome!
Super! I love it.
Yoav
-
I've created a schedule for graduation:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dashorst/517816086/
Is this accurate, and can it be used in the graduation guide? Comments
are welcome!
Martijn
--
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download W
On 5/28/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2. Suggesting that the prospective PMC chair keep the board meeting
schedule in mind (subject to change but well-documented);
What is a good time to send it? Too early: it might get missed, too
late: will likely piss off people, or counts a
On 5/28/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"When a distribution contains code under several licenses, the LICENSE file
should contain details of all these licenses. For each component which is
not Apache licensed, details of the component and the license under which
the component is distrib
On 5/28/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Martijn,
Having read all the posts on this proposal, I have to say I like the
idea of documenting a few things:
i've just committed a rough first pass (you'll need to svn up)
i have no plans to rework ATM so feel free to jump in and im
"When a distribution contains code under several licenses, the LICENSE file
should contain details of all these licenses. For each component which is
not Apache licensed, details of the component and the license under which
the component is distributed should be appended to the LICENSE file."
See
Hi Martijn,
Having read all the posts on this proposal, I have to say I like the
idea of documenting a few things:
1. Having a pro-forma email message that prospective PMC chairs can
edit, just to make sure all the information is in them;
2. Suggesting that the prospective PMC chair keep
On 5/28/07, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 28, 2007, at 12:54 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> The graduation guide is a bit vague and incomplete on one point:
> sending the resolution to the board.
i've added some more content to the graduation guide (but you'll need
to wait for the
On May 28, 2007, at 12:54 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
The graduation guide is a bit vague and incomplete on one point:
sending the resolution to the board.
It is mentioned in the process description to send a message to the
board (to board@), but there are of course no example messages to be
fou
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On 5/27/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The graduation guide is a bit vague and incomplete on one point:
sending the resolution to the board.
It is mentioned in the process description to send a message to the
board (to board@), but there are of course no
Just a friendly reminder. We're missing anoter IPMC vote ...
On 5/22/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have uploaded a version of ServiceMix 3.1.1 in the standard repo
for you to review. See
http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/servicemix-311.html
for the future download page
19 matches
Mail list logo
