Craig L Russell wrote:
> Please review the changes in
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-60 and vote to accept
Just an FYI - I haven't followed the jira flow terribly well, mostly because
it takes an order of magnitude longer in time to parse a Jira incident rather
than approve a pa
+1 (non binding)
I do see other (nitpick) problems in the document that I'll address in
a separate issue (no need to hold back on this change).
Martijn
On 5/20/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please review the changes in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
INCUBATOR-60 and vo
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Craig L. Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please review the changes in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
> INCUBATOR-60 and vote to accept them.
+1
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 21 May 2007 06:45, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> In the doc's for voting in a new PPMC member [1] it is stated that a
> message with the vote results should be sent to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> list. Should the PPMC private list be on the CC list?
I agree with Craig, that the docs provides th
On Monday 21 May 2007 05:12, Craig L Russell wrote:
> [x] +1 Accept the changes
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
--
Hi Martijn,
On May 20, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Congratulations indeed.
Please make notes as you move OpenJPA to its new home. I feel a
guides/postgraduation.xml coming up :)
Good idea.
Craig
Martijn
On 5/19/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Congratulatio
Hi Martijn,
On May 20, 2007, at 3:45 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
In the doc's for voting in a new PPMC member [1] it is stated that a
message with the vote results should be sent to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
list. Should the PPMC private list be on the CC list? If so, shall I
provide a patch to add
In the doc's for voting in a new PPMC member [1] it is stated that a
message with the vote results should be sent to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
list. Should the PPMC private list be on the CC list? If so, shall I
provide a patch to add this to the doc?
In more general terms: is it considered good prac
Hola,
On 5/20/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please review the changes in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
INCUBATOR-60 and vote to accept them. Since this is Incubator Policy,
an affirmative vote is needed before changing. The JIRA issue
has .html files to review in additi
Please review the changes in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
INCUBATOR-60 and vote to accept them. Since this is Incubator Policy,
an affirmative vote is needed before changing. The JIRA issue
has .html files to review in addition to the patch.
[ ] +1 Accept the changes
[ ] -1 Don't a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-60?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Craig Russell updated INCUBATOR-60:
---
Attachment: Roles_and_Responsibilities.html
Process_Description.html
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-60?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Craig Russell updated INCUBATOR-60:
---
Attachment: incubator-60.patch
This patch incorporates the comments made by Martijn and Upa
Congratulations indeed.
Please make notes as you move OpenJPA to its new home. I feel a
guides/postgraduation.xml coming up :)
Martijn
On 5/19/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Congratulations to everyone involved in the OpenJPA project.
OpenJPA is now an official Apache Top Leve
13 matches
Mail list logo
