Re: [VOTE] Graduate OpenJPA to a Top Level Project

+1. Thanks again, Craig, for all the work on the board resolution. -Patrick On 5/8/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear Incubator, The OpenJPA podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider its graduation to a Top Level Project. Please vote on recommending the attached

[VOTE] Graduate OpenJPA to a Top Level Project

Dear Incubator, The OpenJPA podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider its graduation to a Top Level Project. Please vote on recommending the attached draft board resolution. The vote will end in 72 hours, 2300 hours PDT Friday 11-May-2007. [ ] +1 Recommend to the board to est

Re: [discuss] graduation: what is the 'hand over'?

On 5/5/07, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On May 3, 2007, at 5:56 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > What is the post-graduation 'Hand Over'? No idea. Heh. I think we don't really have one. The board@ tries to notify us almost immediately after they vote on any resolution; usually via an

[jira] Closed: (INCUBATOR-63) Attempt to improve the graduation guide

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-63?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Burrell Donkin closed INCUBATOR-63. -- Resolution: Fixed Committed. Many thanks. > Attempt to improve the graduatio

[jira] Assigned: (INCUBATOR-63) Attempt to improve the graduation guide

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-63?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Burrell Donkin reassigned INCUBATOR-63: -- Assignee: Robert Burrell Donkin > Attempt to improve the graduation g

Re: [PROPOSAL] Fix Release Distribution (Outside maven repo)

On 5/7/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Robert, On May 7, 2007, at 12:04 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote: > On 5/7/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi Robert, >> >> +1 for getting this going. >> >> My only concern is the slightly ambiguous #7. I don't know that

Re: [POLL] Incubator Maven Repository

On 5/7/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Xavier Hanin wrote: > On 5/6/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> This is already a concern for existing projects coming from outside >> Apache. It is completely and easily possible to become dependent on >> both org.apac

[Ivy] notice for a vote on a new committer

Hey guys, as mentioned in [1] we discussed on the PPMC a nominee for a new committer - Gilles Scokart. The real vote takes place on the *public* Ivy dev list. This mail is to keep the IPMC updated, as mentioned in [1]. I'll start the vote *after* this mail - Xavier [1] http://incubator.apache.

Re: [POLL] Incubator Maven Repository

+1 Noel. Synapse used to have org.apache.synapse.* as the package, but synapse-incubating-core-0.xx.jar as the JAR file. I'm +1 for using the ordinary repository. Paul On 5/8/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > I agree there is no reason to force org.a

RE: [POLL] Incubator Maven Repository

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > I agree there is no reason to force org.apache.incubating.wicket. to be > renamed after graduation to org.apache.wicket. Agreed, but why is anyone even raising the issue? We don't require incubator to be part of the Java package name, just in distribution file syst

Addressing the redundant data problem

> > RCF > > Tika > > TSIK > aren't in the list at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule Welcome to the redundant (read as: inconsistent -- because that's the nature of redundant data) problem. Again. We have the reporting schedule recorded at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Re