William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2007
>
> RCF
> Tika
> TSIK
aren't in the list at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
so I'm a bit confused. If they don't report - please remove.
---
Well this sort of sucks - with everyone so busy at ApacheCon EU, we've
neglected to remind you of the deadline on the 9th (posted months ago) for
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2007
Abdera
Lokahi
NMaven
RCF
ServiceMix
stdcxx
Tika
TSIK
Tuscany
Woden
WSRP4J
XAP
Yoko
must report. PLEASE rus
Hi Robert,
On May 7, 2007, at 12:04 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 5/7/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Robert,
+1 for getting this going.
My only concern is the slightly ambiguous #7. I don't know that there
is a standard layout for releases. It sure would be nice.
t
Thank you to Tuscany, Wicket, Felix, Lokahi, Ivy, stdcxx, RAT and
others who I forgot to scribble down and were in attendance at
the Incubator BOF (Birds of a Feather) program in Amsterdam.
We had great feedback!
I raised these concerns as a "10 things we hate about incubation"
lightning talk, and
On 5/7/07, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 6, 2007, at 1:45 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> 7 create directories for all current podlings with standard layout and
> appropriate permissions. README.html documents will contain the
> disclaimer
I would prefer to see a tool created t
+1, and apologies for losing energy on doing all this after the last
vote/enormous thread.
Hen
On 5/6/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
infra requires that all releases are contained within
/www/www.apache.org/dist/. here's my proposal for fixing the current
situation for sta
Xavier Hanin wrote:
> On 5/6/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> This is already a concern for existing projects coming from outside
>> Apache. It is completely and easily possible to become dependent on
>> both org.apache.wicket/wicket-1.3.0-incubating-beta1.jar and
>> wicket/wic
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> the current policy document unnecessarily specifies actions to be done
> after graduation. i would like to see these removed from policy and
> replaced by a link to the graduation guide.
What has to happen beyond and outside of incubator isn't actually our policy
-
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> infra requires that all releases are contained within
> /www/www.apache.org/dist/. here's my proposal for fixing the current
> situation for standard (non-maven) releases:
>
> 1 clarify policy (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-62)
> 2 explain policy in
Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 5/7/07, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So, after hearing PDFBox mentioned many times last week, I thought it
>> might be a good idea to ask around inside a wider area to see how the
>> ASF is potentially interested in adopting PDFBox among its proje
This sounds like a good plan.
Craig
On May 7, 2007, at 1:31 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I'll include the points from the policy files that are still absent in
the graduation guide and will be removed from the policy.
Martijn
On 5/7/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 5
On 5/7/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 5/7/07, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, after hearing PDFBox mentioned many times last week, I thought it
> might be a good idea to ask around inside a wider area to see how the
> ASF is potentially interested in adoptin
On May 6, 2007, at 1:45 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
7 create directories for all current podlings with standard layout and
appropriate permissions. README.html documents will contain the
disclaimer
I would prefer to see a tool created that creates (or check structure
of)
directories rath
On May 6, 2007, at 1:57 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
incubator distributions need to be stored under /www/www.apache.org/
dist
AFACT there are two reasonable options: either create repositories
under /www.apache.org/dist/incubator or use the standard maven ones
I don't understand the ques
On 5/7/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll include the points from the policy files that are still absent in
the graduation guide and will be removed from the policy.
great
if you could edit down leo's post on the hand over then that would be good
i'm going to take a look at
I'll include the points from the policy files that are still absent in
the graduation guide and will be removed from the policy.
Martijn
On 5/7/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/7/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The guides/graduation.html is absent from
On 5/7/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Robert,
+1 for getting this going.
My only concern is the slightly ambiguous #7. I don't know that there
is a standard layout for releases. It sure would be nice.
there is a standard layout for the directory structure containing the
art
17 matches
Mail list logo
