APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-05 04:40:19 -0500 (Sun, 05 Feb 2006) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki
Thanks Dan, indeed, as Tuscany is still under incubation, mirrors and other
things won't apply.
Did anybody ever created a script to parse the logs and provide totals ?
On 5/2/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 18:43, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> The mirror system ma
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 18:43, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> The mirror system makes this an essentially unsolvable problem. Not
> to mention the fact that you have no clue if people are actually
> getting the code from one of our mirrors at all, they could get it
> from a linux distribution, or any nu
Garrett Rooney wrote:
> The mirror system makes this an essentially unsolvable problem.
And in addition to all of your other valid points, there is the problem of
having a a farm of caching proxies on the ISP side of the net, leading to
the seemingly odd case that the more popular a download, the
On 5/2/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We're curious to see how many downloads we're getting, perhaps sorted by
ip number or who's downloading (I realize that would need be
"volunteered" information).
Do other projects have a good way to track this? I know we could pull
the logs for
Yes, I'd be interested in this information for the Apache Tuscany downloads
as well...
On 5/2/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We're curious to see how many downloads we're getting, perhaps sorted by
ip number or who's downloading (I realize that would need be
"volunteered" informa
The Apache Tuscany community is pleased to announce Milestone 3
releases of Service Component Architecture (SCA) Native and Service
Data Objects (SDO) for C++.
The Tuscany SCA Native release:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/SCA+Downloads
The Tuscany SDO C++ release:
http://cwi
We're curious to see how many downloads we're getting, perhaps sorted by
ip number or who's downloading (I realize that would need be
"volunteered" information).
Do other projects have a good way to track this? I know we could pull
the logs for the p.a.o webserver and grep through them looking f
On May 2, 2007, at 3:23 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
Here's the revised language:
RESOLVED, that The Apache OpenEJB Project be and hereby is
responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software
project related to enterprise application container
Looks good ...
+1
Alex
Dear Incubator PMC,
The Apache Wicket project asks your permission to release Apache
Wicket 1.3.0-incubating-beta1. The Wicket community has voted [1] to
ship this release. The vote passed with 7 binding +1, 2 non-binding +1
and no +0 or -1 votes.
Apache Wicket is a Ja
The Apache Wicket team is proud to announce Wicket's first Apache
Incubator release. This release is officially approved by the
Incubator PMC [1].
In this announcement:
- Apache Wicket
- This release
- Migrating from 1.2
- Downloading the release
- Reporting bugs
- Fixing bugs
- Incubating Apache
On 5/2/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This vote has been open for 5 days now.
We have 4 binding +1 votes:
Jim Jageilski, James Strachan, Leo Simons, Davanum Srinivas
No -1 or 0 votes.
In addition, on cxf-dev, we got one more non-binding +1 vote.
I'm declaring this vote as passed.
I'm calling this one passed: 5 +1, no 0's or -1's.
Binding +1 votes:
- Betrand Delacretaz
- Paul Fremantle
- Niclas Hedhman (both here and @dev, now that I met him, he should
count for 2 :-)
- Sylvain Wallaz (@dev list)
- Gianugo Rabellino
Thanks for taking the time to look at the package and vo
This vote has been open for 5 days now.
We have 4 binding +1 votes:
Jim Jageilski, James Strachan, Leo Simons, Davanum Srinivas
No -1 or 0 votes.
In addition, on cxf-dev, we got one more non-binding +1 vote.
I'm declaring this vote as passed. I will proceed to releasing the
artifacts.
D
+1
On 5/2/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 4/27/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a new release
> of CXF.
>
> The thread is at:
>
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cxf-dev/200704.mbox/<200704241450.
David Blevins wrote:
> Here's the revised language:
RESOLVED, that The Apache OpenEJB Project be and hereby is
responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software
project related to enterprise application containers and
object distribution services [based on, bu
+1
On 4/27/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a new release
of CXF.
The thread is at:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cxf-dev/200704.mbox/<200704241450.11157.dkulp%40apache.org>
In summary, we have 11 +1 votes, 1 0 vote
+1 from me
Paul
On 5/2/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Tuscany community held a vote to release Apache Tuscany SDO version
1.0-incubating-beta; see ref [0] below.
Please vote to ratify this release.
The release candidate RC1 for Tuscany Java SDO beta1 archive distribution
fil
The Tuscany community held a vote to release Apache Tuscany SDO version
1.0-incubating-beta; see ref [0] below.
Please vote to ratify this release.
The release candidate RC1 for Tuscany Java SDO beta1 archive distribution
files are posted at [1]
The maven repository artifacts are posted in a stag
19 matches
Mail list logo
