Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Petar Tahchiev donation Jakarta Cactus

My vote is not binding, but I think there is still isn't enough clarity on the donation for me to do anything other than vote -1. I can't tell so far what the full set of changes in the grant are. My last question on what the refactoring of the source tree entails have gone unanswered, and hence

[STATUS] (incubator) Wed Apr 25 23:57:21 2007

APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-05 04:40:19 -0500 (Sun, 05 Feb 2006) $] Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/ Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ [note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki

RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

Also, it's probably worth pointing out that schemas-doctype.rsrc is OpenJPA IP, and not a redistribution of someone else's IP. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any att

RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

I'm assuming that you're referring to these known issues from Mike's original email: > To summarize : > orm-xsd.rsrc and persistence-xsd.rsrc are copies of the > official JPA schemas under CDDL that are properly > attributed in LICENSE.txt Yes; there are properly attributed in LICENSE.txt. > ja

RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

It's worth noting a significant difference between that thread's discussion topic and this one: in that thread, the source code with reserved rights (meaninglessly-so or otherwise) was included in the project, whereas in the case of OpenJPA, the NOTICE is identifying a restriction on one of the bin

RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

> Copyright (c) 2002-2006, A. Abram White. All rights reserved. Niclas' point is that "All Rights Reserved" has been a topic of discussion when dealing with an Open Source license. This may help explain: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200409.mbox/%3COF [EMAIL PROTE

RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

> Known issues : [...] Are these noted anywhere in the distribution? --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [RESULT] (was: RE: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache Lucene.Net 2.0 build 004 incubating)

On 4/25/07, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi folks, Can someone help me find the answer to the following questions that I posted: > Speaking of which, where is the official place to upload the > release artifact to i don't know. hopefully people will jump in. and what is the offi

Re: [VOTE] Approve release of Tuscany Native/C++ M3

On 4/25/07, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 23/04/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/23/07, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks Dims, Paul. > > > > We would greatly apreciate a.n.other IPMC member to vote on this > > issues > > > looks

Re: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

+1 I can't wait to start using the final release :) -dain On Apr 24, 2007, at 1:02 PM, Michael Dick wrote: We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a new release of OpenJPA. The vote email thread is available here: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE---THIRD-ATTEMPT--publish-openjpa-0.9.7- i

Re: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

+1 Craig On Apr 24, 2007, at 1:02 PM, Michael Dick wrote: We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a new release of OpenJPA. The vote email thread is available here: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE---THIRD-ATTEMPT--publish-openjpa-0.9.7- incubating-release-tf3620224.html

Re: [VOTE] Approve release of Ivy 2.0.0-alpha1-incubating

On 4/25/07, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/25/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just to be sure we don't miss the gate, tomorrow there will be 72h > since I started the vote, so are the current votes enough to release, > or do I need to ping other of our mentors t

Re: [VOTE] Approve release of Ivy 2.0.0-alpha1-incubating

On 4/25/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just to be sure we don't miss the gate, tomorrow there will be 72h since I started the vote, so are the current votes enough to release, or do I need to ping other of our mentors to get their vote in this thread in the remaining time?... As ht

Re: [VOTE] Approve release of Ivy 2.0.0-alpha1-incubating

Just to be sure we don't miss the gate, tomorrow there will be 72h since I started the vote, so are the current votes enough to release, or do I need to ping other of our mentors to get their vote in this thread in the remaining time? Xavier On 4/24/07, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr

Re: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

Better late than never : http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/RAT/release-0.9.7-rat-output.txt There are a few known issues which I mentioned in the original vote email, and a few files which do not contain IP which have been discu

Re: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

+1 for the release On 4/25/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/25/07, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FWIW, I think that RAT was run at some point during the process. Ah great! Maybe next release, include a link to the RAT report too to avoid folks asking about it

Re: [VOTE] Approve release of Tuscany Native/C++ M3

+1 On 4/25/07, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 23/04/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/23/07, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks Dims, Paul. > > > > We would greatly apreciate a.n.other IPMC member to vote on this > > issues > > > lo

Re: [VOTE] Approve release of Tuscany Native/C++ M3

On 23/04/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/23/07, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Dims, Paul. > > We would greatly apreciate a.n.other IPMC member to vote on this issues looks to me like http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/cpp/sdo

Re: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

On 4/25/07, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: FWIW, I think that RAT was run at some point during the process. Ah great! Maybe next release, include a link to the RAT report too to avoid folks asking about it :) -- James --- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ ---