RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

I don't think that my vote counts on this alias, but hey, I'll vote anyways: +1 -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Syst

RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

FWIW, I think that RAT was run at some point during the process. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its

Re: [vote] Propose OpenEJB for graduation to a TLP

On Apr 24, 2007, at 7:41 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Wednesday 25 April 2007 08:31, David Blevins wrote: Generally, I think it's good to use words that describe EJB then the words Enterprise JavaBeans specifically. Primarily because I think it's good to be able to innovate in the space and

Re: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

+1 looks good to me. It might be worth running RAT against the release next time to double check that all the license headers are properly applied etc. On 4/24/07, Michael Dick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a new release of OpenJPA. The vote email thr

Re: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

On Wednesday 25 April 2007 11:55, Patrick Linskey wrote: > >   * OpenJPA includes software developed by the SERP project > >     Copyright (c) 2002-2006, A. Abram White. All rights reserved. > > > > The "All rights reserved." means that it has not been > > properly licensed, and I as the licensee o

RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

> * OpenJPA includes software developed by the SERP project > Copyright (c) 2002-2006, A. Abram White. All rights reserved. > > The "All rights reserved." means that it has not been > properly licensed, and I as the licensee of OpenJPA will have > no rights to it either. > > Clarification

Re: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

On Wednesday 25 April 2007 04:02, Michael Dick wrote: In the NOTICE file we find; * OpenJPA includes software developed by the SERP project Copyright (c) 2002-2006, A. Abram White. All rights reserved. The "All rights reserved." means that it has not been properly licensed, and I as the li

Re: Trademark search for OpenJPA

On Wednesday 25 April 2007 00:09, Craig L Russell wrote: > I've also looked at the first 180 Google results for OpenJPA and none > of them are about any topic other than our own Apache project. Sadly, > there are approximately 101,000 hits and I just don't have time to > look at all of them. With

Re: [vote] Propose OpenEJB for graduation to a TLP

On Wednesday 25 April 2007 08:31, David Blevins wrote: > Generally, I think it's good to use words that describe EJB then the > words Enterprise JavaBeans specifically. Primarily because I think > it's good to be able to innovate in the space and not limit ourselves > to the ideas approved by the

Re: [[RESULT] (was: RE: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache Lucene.Net 2.0 build 004 incubating)

On Sunday 22 April 2007 20:44, George Aroush wrote: > Speaking of which, where is the office place to upload the release artifact > to and what is the official mailing list to make the announcement? Is > there an ASF document I can read to learn all about this? Check http://www.apache.org/dev/#r

Re: [vote] Propose OpenEJB for graduation to a TLP

On Apr 24, 2007, at 12:46 PM, Brett Porter wrote: On 24/04/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to > enterprise application and remoting services, for distribution at > no charge to the public. A bit generic for a proje

RE: [RESULT] (was: RE: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache Lucene.Net 2.0 build 004 incubating)

Hi folks, Can someone help me find the answer to the following questions that I posted: > Speaking of which, where is the official place to upload the > release artifact to and what is the official mailing list to > make the announcement? Is there an ASF document I can read > to learn all ab

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Petar Tahchiev donation Jakarta Cactus

Dion Gillard wrote: > On 4/24/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What happened here ? >> Not that this doesn't need fixing, but this code donation is hardly a >> new event (was announced on >> February 3rd on the PMC list and the grant was discussed numerous >> times on general

[VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a new release of OpenJPA. The vote email thread is available here: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE---THIRD-ATTEMPT--publish-openjpa-0.9.7-incubating-release-tf3620224.html In summary we have 6

Re: [vote] Propose OpenEJB for graduation to a TLP

On 24/04/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Brett, What is the diversity of the Committer list and the PMC? There are individuals from >= 3 employers in both committers and the PMC. > the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to > enterprise application and re

RE: [vote] Propose OpenEJB for graduation to a TLP

Brett, What is the diversity of the Committer list and the PMC? > the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to > enterprise application and remoting services, for distribution at > no charge to the public. A bit generic for a project that is intended to managing an implementat

Re: Trademark search for OpenJPA

Hi Matthias, Did you ever ping legal-discuss, as mentioned in the JIRA issue? Thanks, Craig On Apr 24, 2007, at 9:13 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hi Craig, see here http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-27 I did it for Trinidad like you did now. US Patent and google search. -M

Re: Trademark search for OpenJPA

Hi Craig, see here http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-27 I did it for Trinidad like you did now. US Patent and google search. -Matthias On 4/24/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm looking to complete the last open item on OpenJPA's incubation requirements, which is

Trademark search for OpenJPA

I'm looking to complete the last open item on OpenJPA's incubation requirements, which is the trademark search. I've seen several unresponded messages over the past two years that no one can seem to find the "free search" button on nameprotect.com. I have to conclude that there is no free s

Re: Posting release candidate artifacts to incubator repo

Upayavira, OK, thanks for the clarification. Kelvin. On 24/04/07, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: kelvin goodson wrote: > Robert, thanks for that. Can I just clarify something please. I may be > mistaken but I thought I had understood that the incubator repo is not > mirrored anywhere.

Re: Posting release candidate artifacts to incubator repo

kelvin goodson wrote: Robert, thanks for that. Can I just clarify something please. I may be mistaken but I thought I had understood that the incubator repo is not mirrored anywhere. If this is true one could interpret from your response that publishing artifacts that have not yet been approve

Re: Posting release candidate artifacts to incubator repo

Robert, thanks for that. Can I just clarify something please. I may be mistaken but I thought I had understood that the incubator repo is not mirrored anywhere. If this is true one could interpret from your response that publishing artifacts that have not yet been approved to the incubator repo

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Petar Tahchiev donation Jakarta Cactus

robert burrell donkin wrote: > On 4/23/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What happened here ? >> Not that this doesn't need fixing, but this code donation is hardly a >> new event (was announced on >> February 3rd on the PMC list and the grant was discussed numerous >> times on

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache::Reload

this has been completed. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/perl/Apache-Reload/ --Geoff Geoffrey Young wrote: > hi all... > > I've started the absorption process for Apache::Reload, a simple Perl > module on CPAN that the author would like us (the mod_perl folks) to > take over. > > relevant di

Re: [VOTE] Approve release of Tuscany Native/C++ M3

I have now removed the xhtml schema from svn and from the sdo source distribution zip/tar.gz and refreshed the md5/asc files here: http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/M3-RC4/ Cheers, On 24/04/07, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: To fix the issue that robert spotted I will remove the o