Re: Initial composition of the PPMC

2007-03-01 Thread Craig L Russell
Hi Noel, Thanks for the additional insights. I'm trying to help set expectations for new podlings as they enter Apache and there appear to be some holes I'd like to patch. Please take this as an offer to help, and not criticism. On Mar 1, 2007, at 8:46 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Craig Ru

RE: Initial composition of the PPMC

2007-03-01 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Craig Russell wrote: > The board resolution to establish a TLP contains the > initial composition of the PMC. > But I notice that the initial composition of an incubating Podling > PMC is not a suggested part of the incubator proposal. No one seems > responsible for it. No such thing as a Podlin

Re: Initial composition of the PPMC

2007-03-01 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Friday 02 March 2007 02:10, Craig L Russell wrote: > 1. Since it is just a guideline, should we say that the mentors are > responsible for establishing the PPMC? I think we should... > 2. Is there any oversight to this process by the Incubator PMC? For > example, if the mentors decide not to

Initial composition of the PPMC

2007-03-01 Thread Craig L Russell
The board resolution to establish a TLP contains the initial composition of the PMC. But I notice that the initial composition of an incubating Podling PMC is not a suggested part of the incubator proposal. No one seems responsible for it. And there is just a guideline: The Podling Proje

Re: [VOTE] Ratify Tuscany vote to release build dependencies

2007-03-01 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Thanks Jim. We have two votes for this - could another IPMC member please take a look (these are small files) so we can start on the main part of our next release. Thanks -- Jeremy On Feb 28, 2007, at 12:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: +1 On Feb 27, 2007, at 10:15 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote