Hi,
The Tuscany project (which is currently under incubation) recently received
a code donation from IBM under JIRA TUSCANY-1126
(http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1126). As indicated in the
issue, the contribution was from IBM to Apache as granted by the CCLA signed
on 9 February
Hi,
To strictly follow the process, I have removed the code from my sandbox too.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Boynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: EJB code dump, was: svn commit: r511225 [1/4]
Thanks Raymond.
Craig Russell (JIRA) wrote:
> Add process for voting a new PPMC member to guides/ppmc
> ---
>
> Key: INCUBATOR-56
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-56
> Project: Incubator
>
It should be pretty easy for us to add that to Tuscany. You don't have
to recreate the Geronimo setup, we can just map the Patch Info custom
field over to Tuscany too. It doesn't seem the end of the world - so
I've gone ahead and done that.
Let me know if it causes problems.
Hen
On 2/23/07, kel
Thanks Raymond.
Strictly the code should not be in SVN until it has been cleared
legally and part of that would be to deal with issues like the
copyright here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/rfeng/
ejb/binding/pom.xml
First step of the legal side is to have rec
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
...
> I "vetoed" the codedump for two main reasons. The first is that the IP
> clearance process is not being followed: there is no record of the code
> here
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
> and there has been no vote by the Tuscany PPMC or Incubator
Hi,
Sorry for the confusion as I'm new to this situation. I meant to get the
code into SVN as a base for discussion. I chose the paticular branch simply
because I only need minor effort to get the code built.
I moved the code to my sandbox for now
(http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/t
On Feb 25, 2007, at 7:18 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Sunday 25 February 2007 22:34, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
The vote below was held in the Tuscany podling to release two
artifacts that are used by other modules during the build process;
they are a podling-wide parent pom and configuration data fo
Hi,
Congrats on the getting the vote passed and the release out.
I'd like to re-iterate my question: besides Cliff, where are your
other two mentors? I was hoping to here from them after I asked a
week ago in the voting thread itself. Even a response like "I'm too
busy to review this release ri
On Sunday 25 February 2007 22:34, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> The vote below was held in the Tuscany podling to release two
> artifacts that are used by other modules during the build process;
> they are a podling-wide parent pom and configuration data for code
> checking.
>
> There are four +1's from t
The vote below was held in the Tuscany podling to release two
artifacts that are used by other modules during the build process;
they are a podling-wide parent pom and configuration data for code
checking.
There are four +1's from the PPMC but no binding votes and we would
like to ask the
On 2/25/07, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 23, 2007, at 10:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: rfeng
> Date: Fri Feb 23 22:26:55 2007
> New Revision: 511225
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=511225
> Log:
> [sca-integration-branch] Add EJB reference bindi
On Friday 23 February 2007 16:39, Adam Lally wrote:
> The Apache UIMA community has voted to release version
> 2.1.0-incubating. We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to
> approve this release.
>
> Release artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/
A quick look thro
13 matches
Mail list logo
