On 2/13/07, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The log4net-dev community appears healthy and I believes warrants
graduation from the incubator and has my +1 as mentor and incubator
PMC member.
Thanks for the email and the response to Yoav!
+1 for graduation. -- justin
---
On 2/14/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My specific concern is with the Incubator exit criterion of ""The
project is not highly dependent on any single contributor (there's at
least 3 legally independent committers and there is no single company
or entity that is vital to the succes
On Thursday 15 February 2007 13:32, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There had been several individuals who had submitted patches that
> > had been incorporated, however no individual had established a
> > pattern of submissions which would sug
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There had been several individuals who had submitted patches that
> had been incorporated, however no individual had established a
> pattern of submissions which would suggest them as a potential
> additional committer.
I've been watch
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-05 04:40:19 -0500 (Sun, 05 Feb 2006) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki
On Thursday 15 February 2007 02:07, Hans Granqvist wrote:
> In fact, since I'm reminded of TSIK: Since it failed ASF
> incubation, I'd like to move its source (perhaps to
> sourceforge, not sure yet). I'd want keep the ASF license
> and all, but I am not sure what the rule is with current
> "org.
Please vote to change Incubator Policy to remove "escalate" as a
policy term meaning "guaduate":
[+1] apply the patch
[-1] don't apply the patch
Here's my +1
+1
Craig
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Craig Russell (JIRA)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: February 14, 2007 5:30:05 PM PST
To: gene
On Thursday 15 February 2007 01:09, Brian McCallister wrote:
> Considering the possible legal implications of getting IP wrong, it
> may be a good thing to require the formal approval just to force more
> eyes to look at things. That said, I hesitate to increase the
> incubator workload when the w
On Thursday 15 February 2007 00:42, Curt Arnold wrote:
+1
Cheers
Niclas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-55?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12473283
]
Craig Russell commented on INCUBATOR-55:
I agree with this patch which removes process details from the pol
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-53?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Craig Russell updated INCUBATOR-53:
---
Attachment: incubator-53.patch
This patch applies to Incubation_Policy only.
> Remove ref
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-53?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12473277
]
Craig Russell commented on INCUBATOR-53:
I've committed changes to the two non-policy documents.
svn commit
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Done with all the 4 items.
Thanks, dims. -Hans
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/14/07, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is no reasonable expectation of log4php satisfying the exit
criteria. log4php has had no code modification in over a year and
minimal activity on the log4php-dev and log4php-user mailing lists.
Repeated attempts have been made to communica
Curt Arnold wrote:
>
> Acting only as mentor and Incubator PMC member and not on behalf of the
> Logging Services PMC, I request that the Incubator PMC terminate the
> log4php incubation. The source code should continue to be available
> from the Subversion, though possibly in a different locatio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-55?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin updated INCUBATOR-55:
---
Attachment: post-graduation.patch
Patch removes post graduation check list
Move Post Graduation Check List
---
Key: INCUBATOR-55
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-55
Project: Incubator
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: policy, site
Reporter: Rob
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-54?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12473239
]
Robert Burrell Donkin commented on INCUBATOR-54:
I think that this change would be useful. However,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-53?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12473236
]
Robert Burrell Donkin commented on INCUBATOR-53:
+1 for all proposed changes
I'd be very happy to
Incubator,
Several issues were found with the previous release files and have been
resolved:
1.) NOTICE file contained a list of the Committers
- Issue Raiser: William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Resolution: List of committers has been removed from the file.
2.) No signature files
- Issue Raise
On 2/14/07, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 2/14/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2/14/07, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Growing committers for an mature project is hard when most users are
>>
>>
>> Thanks for a long
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 2/14/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 2/14/07, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Growing committers for an mature project is hard when most users are
Thanks for a long, but welcome explanation of the situation for those
of us unfamiliar
On 2/14/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 2/14/07, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Growing committers for an mature project is hard when most users are
Thanks for a long, but welcome explanation of the situation for those
of us unfamiliar with it.
+1 to graduating lo
Having read your note I'm also +1.
Paul
On 2/14/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 2/14/07, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Growing committers for an mature project is hard when most users are
Thanks for a long, but welcome explanation of the situation for those
of u
Done with all the 4 items.
On 2/14/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 2/14/07, Hans Granqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TSIK failed incubation a few months back -- I'm not sure why
> its name keeps popping up. Is there something that I failed
> to "close out" on TSIK?
For s
Hi,
On 2/14/07, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Growing committers for an mature project is hard when most users are
Thanks for a long, but welcome explanation of the situation for those
of us unfamiliar with it.
+1 to graduating log4net.
Yoav
---
On Feb 14, 2007, at 7:02 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
This is a bit of an unusual case and I'm not sure how to vote.
Stuff that makes me worry about log4net:
- The community seems to be shrinking, not growing, even though past
status reports have made it a top point to expand the community.
- T
Curt Arnold wrote:
>
> The log4net-dev community appears healthy and I believes warrants
> graduation from the incubator and has my +1 as mentor and incubator PMC
> member.
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addi
Curt Arnold wrote:
>
> Acting only as mentor and Incubator PMC member and not on behalf of the
> Logging Services PMC, I request that the Incubator PMC terminate the
> log4php incubation. The source code should continue to be available
> from the Subversion, though possibly in a different locatio
Hi,
On 2/14/07, Hans Granqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TSIK failed incubation a few months back -- I'm not sure why
its name keeps popping up. Is there something that I failed
to "close out" on TSIK?
For starters:
- Remove TSIK from the list of active projects on the right-hand side
of ht
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
OK, we're almost there ;)
Lokahi, stdcxx, TSIK, WSRP4J, y'all still have a few hours.
Hi Yoav,
TSIK failed incubation a few months back -- I'm not sure why
its name keeps popping up. Is there something that I failed
to "close out" on TSIK?
In fact, since I'm reminde
On 2/14/07, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 13, 2007, at 6:00 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
> The last code grant for the mod_wombat codebase ( http://
> incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/httpd-wombat.html ) has been
> recorded and I would like to move forward with the import.
>
On Feb 14, 2007, at 6:00 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
This is a lazy-consensus approval vote.
Huh? These types of things should require activing
voting, not lazy-consensus. Otherwise the Incubator
is worthless.
I am just quoting from the IP Clearance docs:
Fourth paragraph (if you count the tex
Hi,
On 2/14/07, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Acting only as mentor and Incubator PMC member and not on behalf of
the Logging Services PMC, I request that the Incubator PMC terminate
the log4php incubation.
+1.
how to revive the project if circumstances change. The Incubator PMC
sh
There is no reasonable expectation of log4php satisfying the exit
criteria. log4php has had no code modification in over a year and
minimal activity on the log4php-dev and log4php-user mailing lists.
Repeated attempts have been made to communicate with the sole
committer without success.
+1 from me
On 2/13/07, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Earlier today I requested votes on woden-dev [1] to approve our candidate
driver for the Woden Milestone 7 (M7) release. This note is to inform the
IPMC of this vote and invite interested members to review the driver and
vot
On Feb 13, 2007, at 6:00 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
The last code grant for the mod_wombat codebase ( http://
incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/httpd-wombat.html ) has been
recorded and I would like to move forward with the import.
Code grants and CLA's have been recorded from each person
Hi,
This is a bit of an unusual case and I'm not sure how to vote.
Stuff that makes me worry about log4net:
- The community seems to be shrinking, not growing, even though past
status reports have made it a top point to expand the community.
- There has been no release in almost a year, since 1.2
Hi,
OK, we're almost there ;)
Lokahi, stdcxx, TSIK, WSRP4J, y'all still have a few hours.
I was also hoping to see the Ivy report (originally expected last
month) on http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2007 by now...
Yoav
---
Henri Yandell wrote:
> And because naming and shaming works:
>
> ...
> XAP
> ...
Only projects that are current on their board reports should be allowed to
release.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-53?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12473021
]
Trustin Lee commented on INCUBATOR-53:
--
Looks very good to me.
> Remove references to "escalation" from Incub
41 matches
Mail list logo
