Craig Russell asked:
Henri gave definitions for two of the three. Examples of escalation would
be raising an issue to the Incubator PMC or the ASF Board if you are
having problems that can't be resolved by not going that route.
--- Noel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signa
See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
This month's reports are DUE BY February 14. That's next Wednesday.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PR
This kind of information would be good to be documented, maybe in a form of
a RELEASE_NOTES and included on the distribution. I didn't see any reference
for what's changed on the zip distribution for JDK 1.5.
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
On 2/8/07, James M Snell <[EMAIL
The main issues resolved include a critical bug in handling XML and
XHTML content in Atom entries and resolving some StAX API conformance
issues by upgrading to Axiom 1.2.1. We've also eliminated our
dependence on the Stax Reference Implementation. Beyond that, the
remaining changes were relative
Hi Henri,
On Feb 8, 2007, at 4:23 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On 2/8/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've seen all three of these terms used in the incubator web site.
Is there
an official term for the process of removing a podling from the
incubator to
its proper place in
On 2/8/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've seen all three of these terms used in the incubator web site. Is there
an official term for the process of removing a podling from the incubator to
its proper place in Apache? Do we want to standardize the terminology?
Graduation i
On 2/8/07, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Abdera team is ready to release version v0.2.2. This is a bug fix
release that addresses a number of critical issues. There are no new
features. We would appreciate if folks could take a look and weigh in.
Do you have a list of changes
The ServiceMix community has voted to relase
apache-serviemix-3.1-incubating.
We now ask the Incubator PMC to approve this release.
Download page, release notes, etc ...
http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/servicemix-31.html
Direct links:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-reposi
I have uploaded a new version of which includes the missing license for
JAXB and JAXWS.
I will start a new vote.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Thilo Goetz wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm currently involved in preparing the first UIMA incubator release,
>> so I looked at your rele
In a mad rush to make it look like we were busy in the three months
since the last board report, I'd like to try to resolve log4net and
log4php's status as well and try to streamline the Logging Services
bylaws (aka guidelines). Most of that discussion and all of the fun
debates will be on
The Abdera team is ready to release version v0.2.2. This is a bug fix
release that addresses a number of critical issues. There are no new
features. We would appreciate if folks could take a look and weigh in.
// JDK 1.5
http://people.apache.org/~jmsnell/abdera.0.2.2-incubating.zip
http://peopl
I'd like to see some clarification on the role of the PPMC and the
process of managing the PPMC membership. I've looked for guidance in
the web pages and it's not clear to me what to do to vote in a new
PPMC member, and then what to do.
For example, in Incubation_Policy.html, there is no me
Hi,
I've seen all three of these terms used in the incubator web site. Is
there an official term for the process of removing a podling from the
incubator to its proper place in Apache? Do we want to standardize
the terminology?
If so, I'll volunteer to write JIRA issues to make the refere
hi all...
I've started the absorption process for Apache::Reload, a simple Perl
module on CPAN that the author would like us (the mod_perl folks) to
take over.
relevant discussion and votes here:
http://xrl.us/upm5
I've added a file as instructed at ip-clearance-template.html
incubator/sit
Votes so far:
+1 Otis
+1 Niclas
Binding:
+1 Yoav
+1 Henri
+1 Davanum
+1 Brian
+1 Martin
+1 Jim
+1 Alex
+1 Noel
+1 Jean
At what point do we declare victory and start working on the
post-graduation check list?
- Dave
-
To unsu
72 hours.
Though the next step is to send the resolution to the board to be
voted on as Roller is going to be a TLP. Board meeting is in 2 weeks.
Then the post-graduation stuff kicks in.
Hen
On 2/8/07, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Votes so far:
+1 Otis
+1 Niclas
Binding:
+1 Yoav
+1 Henri
Here it is:
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/rat-servicemix-3,1-incubating.txt
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Yoav Shapira wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> The bug / improvement list shows an impressive amount of work for a
>> point release. Just out of curiosity (not related to approvi
Add one "sentimental, non-binding +1" from Danese
On Feb 8, 2007, at 8:40 AM, Dave wrote:
Votes so far:
+1 Otis
+1 Niclas
Binding:
+1 Yoav
+1 Henri
+1 Davanum
+1 Brian
+1 Martin
+1 Jim
+1 Alex
+1 Noel
+1 Jean
At what point do we declare victory and start working on the
post-graduation check
+1
-jean
Dave wrote:
> OK, let's try this again.
>
> The Roller community believes that Roller is ready for graduation, as
> evidenced by this vote:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-roller-dev/200702.mbox/browser
>
>
> We would like to initiate a vote to graduate to a top
Thilo Goetz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently involved in preparing the first UIMA incubator release,
> so I looked at your release with a view to what I could learn ;-) To
> my (newbie) eyes it all looks very clean, license headers everywhere etc.
Thanks !
>
> One thing I noted is that you're dist
Yoav Shapira wrote:
> Hi,
> The bug / improvement list shows an impressive amount of work for a
> point release. Just out of curiosity (not related to approving the
> release), what kind of automated testing do you use?
We have junit test cases and constant feedback of the user community ;-)
>
Hi,
I'm currently involved in preparing the first UIMA incubator release, so
I looked at your release with a view to what I could learn ;-) To my
(newbie) eyes it all looks very clean, license headers everywhere etc.
One thing I noted is that you're distributing the Java Activation
framewor
Hi,
The bug / improvement list shows an impressive amount of work for a
point release. Just out of curiosity (not related to approving the
release), what kind of automated testing do you use?
As for the release itself: have you had a chance to run Robert's RAT
tool (http://code.google.com/p/arat
The ServiceMix community has voted to relase
apache-serviemix-3.1-incubating.
We now ask the Incubator PMC to approve this release.
Download page, release notes, etc ...
http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/servicemix-31.html
Direct links:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-reposi
24 matches
Mail list logo
