On Thursday 21 December 2006 11:46, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
[x] +1 Accept River as a new podling as described below
[ ] -1 Do not accept the new podling (provide reason, please)
Good name too.
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-05 04:40:19 -0500 (Sun, 05 Feb 2006) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki
+1
Phil
On 12/20/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 21 December 2006 11:46, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
[x] +1 Accept River as a new podling as described below
[ ] -1 Do not accept the new podling (provide reason, please)
non-binding.
Cheers
Niclas
---
On Thursday 21 December 2006 11:46, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
[x] +1 Accept River as a new podling as described below
[ ] -1 Do not accept the new podling (provide reason, please)
non-binding.
Cheers
Niclas
-
To unsubscribe,
Note - this vote will be for 3 days, ending midnight, saturday december
23rd, 2006.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
It is with great relief and hope that I propose that the Apache
Incubator PMC vote to incubate a new podling, to be known as "River".
You may be familiar with this project as it has b
+1 from me
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
It is with great relief and hope that I propose that the Apache
Incubator PMC vote to incubate a new podling, to be known as "River".
You may be familiar with this project as it has been discussed under
other names, including Braintree and Jini. I've actua
It is with great relief and hope that I propose that the Apache
Incubator PMC vote to incubate a new podling, to be known as "River".
You may be familiar with this project as it has been discussed under
other names, including Braintree and Jini. I've actually lost track of
the Quest for a Name
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
> If an officer believes that a release package should be "vetoed"
> for legal reasons, then they should inform infrastructure to remove
> the release from distribution.
Take that one step further...
s/officer/officer or member/
Any PMC member who discovers a legal viol
On Dec 20, 2006, at 3:20 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 18:04, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Dec 19, 2006, at 8:02 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
That's how it works.
No, that's not how it works.
Isn't it a bit scary that two of the most respected members of ASF
don't agree
The chair is not delegated authority over the projects -- only
responsibility to manage the committee, and thus the only decisions
that a chair can go hog-wild on are the establishment of unusual
project bylaws or appointment and removal of committee members
(which requires an ACK by a board memb
Hi,
On 12/20/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 18:04, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2006, at 8:02 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> > That's how it works.
> No, that's not how it works.
Isn't it a bit scary that two of the most respected members of ASF don
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 18:04, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2006, at 8:02 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> > That's how it works.
> No, that's not how it works.
Isn't it a bit scary that two of the most respected members of ASF don't agree
on how ASF operates "when push come to shove" ?
C
On Dec 19, 2006, at 8:02 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On 12/11/06, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> Can a PMC chair veto a release?
No. A chair only counts as one vote. A chair's only special powers
are to receive things officially and ensure that the PMC does vote.
Euh... no. Now
On 12/20/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...The Solr community has voted to release apache-solr-1.1.0-incubating
We now ask the Incubator PMC to approve this release
+1
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI
14 matches
Mail list logo
