Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ CPP 1.0

2006-11-24 Thread Nathan Mittler
Source bundles have been renamed appropriately and the page has been updated to point to the release bundles. I've also added a release notes section. The release page is here: http://www.activemq.org/site/activemq-cpp-10-release.html I don't believe there are any outstanding issues. Given tha

Voting a release in the podling list with IPMC binding votes, was: Re: Notification of a(nother) release vote for Tuscany

2006-11-24 Thread Luciano Resende
So, just to make sure I understand it now, even tough we might have three +1 IPMC binding votes in the podlign dev-list, we would still have to run a voting thread on this list and wait for three +1 IPMC biding votes ? On 11/22/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/22/06, L

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

2006-11-24 Thread Davanum Srinivas
oops, pressed send too fast!. and a check for the downloaded files before issuing a fresh . So for offline builds you have to be on-line once.. thanks, dims On 11/24/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: FWIW, typically we end up using ant's tag to get such files... -- dims On 11/2

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

2006-11-24 Thread Davanum Srinivas
FWIW, typically we end up using ant's tag to get such files... -- dims On 11/24/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well, we'd like to have it as part of our build as it seems necessary to test JAXB 2 + soap with attachments*. We've included it as a URL instead of a local file now, bu

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

2006-11-24 Thread Dan Diephouse
Well, we'd like to have it as part of our build as it seems necessary to test JAXB 2 + soap with attachments*. We've included it as a URL instead of a local file now, but that breaks offline builds - which we've worked hard to avoid so far. Regards, - Dan * I'm going to confirm that though. It'

Re: [VOTE WITHDRAWN] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

2006-11-24 Thread Endre Stølsvik
James Strachan wrote: On 11/21/06, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What do you do when it comes time to vote? Clearly, you can't be voting on the RC build, as that's not the final build (the final build doesn't include RC in the name, does it?), and it's my understanding that only fin

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

2006-11-24 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Robert, Users can download that xsd and use it themselves. We don't have to ship it in the box:) -- dims On 11/24/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/24/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've taken immediate action to remove these files from SVN. thanks :-)

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

2006-11-24 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 11/24/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've taken immediate action to remove these files from SVN. thanks :-) I'm curious to know if any other Apache projects depend on this wsi-swa.xsd file as I don't think its possible to use the JAXB 2.0 soap with attachments support without

detached license information [WAS Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 RAT Release]

2006-11-24 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 11/24/06, Bozhong Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: robert burrell donkin wrote: > > On 11/22/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The Apache CXF team has cut a candidate release > > > bit unfortunate about the licensing foobar - looked a good release :-/ > > here are the notes i ma

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

2006-11-24 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 11/24/06, Bozhong Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: robert burrell donkin wrote: > > On 11/22/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The Apache CXF team has cut a candidate release > > > bit unfortunate about the licensing foobar - looked a good release :-/ > > here are the notes i ma

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

2006-11-24 Thread Bozhong Lin
robert burrell donkin wrote: On 11/22/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Apache CXF team has cut a candidate release bit unfortunate about the licensing foobar - looked a good release :-/ here are the notes i made before i found the license issue just FYI for feedback -- po