Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

2006-11-23 Thread Dan Diephouse
Hi Again, I did it a bit of poking around and it seems that no one else is using the wsi-swa.xsd which is good. There are however two files in Axis1 C though that are under the WS-I test license: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/webservices/axis/trunk/c/tests/auto_build/wsi/analyzerConfig.xml?view=lo

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

2006-11-23 Thread Dan Diephouse
I've taken immediate action to remove these files from SVN. I'm curious to know if any other Apache projects depend on this wsi-swa.xsd file as I don't think its possible to use the JAXB 2.0 soap with attachments support without referencing this file. I know the JAXWS-RI itself redistributes it, w

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

2006-11-23 Thread Dan Diephouse
Arggh... *mutters very bad things about standards organizations*. Looking into this deeper, and the only file that I can find that is associated with the WS-I organization is this one: http://fisheye3.cenqua.com/browse/celtixfire/trunk/distribution/src/main/release/samples/mtom/wsdl/wsi-swa.xsd?

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

2006-11-23 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 11/22/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The Apache CXF team has cut a candidate release bit unfortunate about the licensing foobar - looked a good release :-/ here are the notes i made before i found the license issue just FYI for feedback -- possible minor issues -- RAT: http

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

2006-11-23 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 11/22/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We ask that you please vote to approve this release binary: [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache CXF 2.0-M1 [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) -1 *** IMPORTANT *** my reading of http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/i

Another question about LGPL code

2006-11-23 Thread Guillaume Nodet
When entering incubation, the ServiceMix project left a small amount of code at Codehaus. This code uses some vendor libraries or LGPL libraries (the jboss integration). However no one has ever released this code. I was wondering if we could import this code in the incubator servicemix svn area,

Re: Woden podling artifacts on ibiblio!!

2006-11-23 Thread Davanum Srinivas
thanks a ton Jason. -- dims On 11/23/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The artifacts have been removed from the central repository. Jason. On 22 Nov 06, at 6:54 AM 22 Nov 06, Jeremy Hughes wrote: > Unknown to the woden-dev team (until today) our M6 release artifacts > have escaped

Re: Woden podling artifacts on ibiblio!!

2006-11-23 Thread Jason van Zyl
The artifacts have been removed from the central repository. Jason. On 22 Nov 06, at 6:54 AM 22 Nov 06, Jeremy Hughes wrote: Unknown to the woden-dev team (until today) our M6 release artifacts have escaped to ibiblio (see this thread on woden-dev): http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws

RE: [VOTE] Publish Yoko M1 release

2006-11-23 Thread Nolan, Edell
Great! Thanks and we will definitely consider all your suggestions for the next release. Edell. -Original Message- From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 November 2006 23:49 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Publish Yoko M1 release Hi, On 11/21/06,

Re: [VOTE WITHDRAWN] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

2006-11-23 Thread James Strachan
On 11/21/06, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What do you do when it comes time to vote? Clearly, you can't be voting on the RC build, as that's not the final build (the final build doesn't include RC in the name, does it?), and it's my understanding that only final bits are voted on.