Re: Release notes... [was Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix 3.0.1]

On 11/21/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/20/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i strongly recommend adding RELEASE_NOTES. these are an important form > of guerrilla advertising. yes, tools like maven can generate lots of > documentation about the release

[STATUS] (incubator) Wed Nov 22 23:57:03 2006

APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-05 04:40:19 -0500 (Sun, 05 Feb 2006) $] Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/ Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ [note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki

RE: [VOTE WITHDRAWN] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

Patrick, > Personally, I don't much care what we do at this point, although I'd > prefer a 0.9.7 to 0.9.6.1 > However, I *would* like clear guidance about what to do. Figuring this out is something that the PPMC ought to deal with. You have had several suggestions made to you, and one of the th

Re: [VOTE WITHDRAWN] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

On Nov 21, 2006, at 10:52 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote: However, I *would* like clear guidance about what to do. Do what makes most sense for your developers and your users. It sounds like you know what that is. Is this going to cause problems with incubator approval of the 0.9.6 vote that's

Re: [VOTE] Publish Yoko M1 release

Hi, On 11/21/06, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I wouldn't call either a blocker, notably since the release packages were created and the vote started well before November 1st, but I'll need to give the packages a more thorough review before voting. +1 for the release, looks good PS

Re: [VOTE WITHDRAWN] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

On 11/22/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry, I just don't like that changes to the bits based on an internal review should change the name of the release. (there are several reasons why some projects choose to do this but here's one of mine) very occasionally such jars escape

Re: Notification of a(nother) release vote for Tuscany

On 11/22/06, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes Jeremy, this is my understanding as well... If we get the three IPMC +1 votes on Tuscany devlist, we could do something simmilar to this thread : http://www.mail-archive.com/general%40incubator.apache.org/msg11681.html this example may

Re: [VOTE] Graduate OFBiz Podling

On Nov 22, 2006, at 8:06 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, I'm guessing we'll close this vote next Monday, after the long holiday weekend? Because activity has slowed on this vote I was thinking of announcing the result today, but there is no hurry so Monday is fine. -David On 11/20/06, Noe

Re: Release notes... [was Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix 3.0.1]

On 11/22/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/20/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i strongly recommend adding RELEASE_NOTES. these are an important form > of guerrilla advertising. yes, tools like maven can generate lots of > documentation about the release

Re: [VOTE] Graduate OFBiz Podling

Hi, I'm guessing we'll close this vote next Monday, after the long holiday weekend? Yoav On 11/20/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: robert burrell donkin wrote: > Apache OFBiz - The Open For Business Project > (anyone see any issues with that?) Not me. As noted, my concern was r

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

+1 Cheers, Peter On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 11:12:17PM -0500, Dan Diephouse wrote: > The Apache CXF team has cut a candidate release and published builds here: > > Binaries and Source Distributions: > http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/

Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ CPP 1.0

I'm new to this judging releases game, so I apologise if I'm missing the mark, but... If ActuveMQ is incubating, shouldn't the filename of the release reflect that? Upayavira James Strachan wrote: +1 On 11/16/06, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 though I'd consider making

Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ CPP 1.0

+1 On 11/16/06, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 though I'd consider making the configure script +x in the future. -Brian On Nov 14, 2006, at 6:30 PM, Nathan Mittler wrote: > The ActiveMQ community has voted on the release of ActiveMQ CPP 1.0 > with a > total of 6 +1's. > > The

Re: Woden podling artifacts on ibiblio!!

Hi Dims, thanks. I've removed them from people.apache.org and made the request to repository@apache.org to remove them from ibiblio. Thanks, Jeremy On 11/22/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please send an email to repository@apache.org asking them to take it off. Please remove it

Re: Woden podling artifacts on ibiblio!!

Please send an email to repository@apache.org asking them to take it off. Please remove it from m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository as well. thanks, dims On 11/22/06, Jeremy Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Unknown to the woden-dev team (until today) our M6 release artifacts have escaped to ibiblio (s

Re: Packaging for distribution - replacement for InstallShield functionality?

Andrew McIntyre wrote: > There is a large body of usage outside the ASF that is documented on > the NSIS website as well. As for other Windows-only options, httpd > distributes an MSI installer for Windows, but I have no knowledge of > how that is actually generated. InstallShield. Actually, IS d

Woden podling artifacts on ibiblio!!

Unknown to the woden-dev team (until today) our M6 release artifacts have escaped to ibiblio (see this thread on woden-dev): http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-woden-dev/200611.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] via them being erroneously being put into here: http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibib

Re: Notification of a(nother) release vote for Tuscany

Ah, it is all making sense to me now. Thanks for the clarification as I learn the incubator ways! :-) - Dan On 11/22/06, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes Jeremy, this is my understanding as well... If we get the three IPMC +1 votes on Tuscany devlist, we could do something simmil

RE: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

+1 Tom > -Original Message- > From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 2006?11?21? 20:12 > To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org; general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release > > > The Apache CXF team has cut a candidate release and published > build

RE: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 22 November 2006 04:12 > To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org; general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release > > The Apache CXF team has cut a candidate release and published > build

Re: Notification of a(nother) release vote for Tuscany

Yes Jeremy, this is my understanding as well... If we get the three IPMC +1 votes on Tuscany devlist, we could do something simmilar to this thread : http://www.mail-archive.com/general%40incubator.apache.org/msg11681.html -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende On 11/21/06, Jeremy

RE: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 11:12 PM > To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org; general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release > > The Apache CXF team has cut a candidate release and publishe

RE: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 12:12 PM > To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org; general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release > > > The Apache CXF team has cut a candidate release and publi

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

+1 The Apache CXF team has cut a candidate release and published builds here: Binaries and Source Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/ Maven Repository: http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

+1 Dan Diephouse wrote: The Apache CXF team has cut a candidate release and published builds here: Binaries and Source Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/ Maven Repository: http://people.apache.org/~blin/i

RE: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

+1 Jervis > -Original Message- > From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 12:12 PM > To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org; general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release > > > The Apache CXF team has cut a candidate release