Daniel Kulp wrote:
> Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > > Similarly, I'm seeing a number of files that show up with every
> > > single line changed, when AFAICT all that should change is the
> > > removal of a single line from the list of projects. What's up with
> > > that?
> >
> > Do you really want to
+1
Looks good to me.
On 11/14/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey folks,
I was able to finally get around to doing a binary release candidate
from the 4.1 branch.
it's available here:
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.1.0-RC2/m2-incubating-repository/org/apa
Hey folks,
I was able to finally get around to doing a binary release candidate
from the 4.1 branch.
it's available here:
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.1.0-RC2/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/4.1.0-incubator/
Maven 1 and Maven 2 repos for t
The Apache Open For Business Project community has voted internally
and agreed on readiness to graduate from the Apache Incubator based
on the Incubator Policy exit guidelines here:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Exiting
+the+Incubator
The vote passed with
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
On 11/13/06, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
First, I get the error below (and seems to either hang or
spin indefinetly after that.) Is gcc required in order to
run ant?
gcc is not required and not used. gcj is GNU Classpath Java, an
alternative Java binary
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 11:48 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> /usr/bin/java: line 5: gcj: command not found
> Buildfile: build.xml
>
It looks as though you are using the Gnu Compiler for Java (gcj) to
compile - this is the default for many Linux distributions. This will
not work - you need to use sun's
Hi,
On 11/13/06, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
First, I get the error below (and seems to either hang or
spin indefinetly after that.) Is gcc required in order to
run ant?
gcc is not required and not used. gcj is GNU Classpath Java, an
alternative Java binary that comes bundled with
This is my first time using the new infrastructure to update
the site after updating the stdcxx status page. I'm running
into some errors that I could use help with. I'm using ant
1.6.2 and gcc 3.4.4 on Linux 2.6.9/EM64T.
First, I get the error below (and seems to either hang or
spin indefinetly
On Nov 11, 2006, at 12:05 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
(On a side note: To be perfectly frank, it makes me cringe
to see this horribly effort-intensive and error-prone process
being used by the ASF. IMHO, all this stuff should be
regularised and normalised and maintained via Web forms. If
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
robert burrell donkin wrote:
>
> hopefully some of the mentors will jump in sometime soon (it might be
> worth someone giving them a gentle prod)
Someone gave me a gentle prod, but I have been remiss in
my duties as mentor and would have to catch up
With 3 binding +1s and 7 +1s from the PPMC I think we've finally got
the 4.0.2 release approved! :)
On 11/8/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 from me.
-- dims
On 11/8/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hiram,
>
> I pulled the versions from your personal site and
On 11/13/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ken wrot:
> Worse, there are some that have made releases while the IP
> issues -- according to the status page -- are still in doubt.
:-( Error in oversight by us, then. What kind(s) of IP issues?
i've only just started to check t
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
On 11/10/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If we go the first route, then we should treat this list as an
announcements list. Results of votes for releases and graduation are
posted here, and incubator PMC members will be given 72 hours to raise
an issue.
I've been
On 11/13/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What triggered me to write a response earlier in the first place
however, was the negative vibe that pulsated from the message. Does
Apache have grave problems finding enough volunteers? Is it felt too
many projects incubated without trying
On 11/10/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes. But a project hosted at say Sourceforge can share those values
equally (or sometimes even better imo, as they don't have to cope with
politics).
Exactly!
It's important that we *discourage* dilettante applicants who decide
to join th
By joining the foundation, we would hope that at least some of the
project volunteers willl go on to become Members, and accept
responsibility for the Foundation. But, up front, I'm not sure that we
are communicating our implicit hope that every committer will become a
Member, and that we all shar
On 11/10/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And yet it seems very attractive. Visibility makes it a lot easier for
communities to grow. Maybe not for a SourceForge success story, but
definitely for smaller projects. Brand recognition the same.
We have our share of projects with small
Hi,
We are still waiting to get our milestone one released -
can someone please take a look for us.
Thanks, Edell.
-Original Message-
From: Mosur Ravi, Balaji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 October 2006 15:28
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Publish Yoko M1 rel
Passed with +1 votes from rubys, farra and davanum and no -1s.
Thanks to all for reviewing and commenting.
Kelvin.
On 06/11/06, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I understand it is good practice to restart a vote if the vote thread
becomes heavy with discussion. This is the case with t
19 matches
Mail list logo
