On 11/9/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/9/06, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of the tasks suggested in the welcome-to-apache was to set up a
> public/private key pair for signing in (instead of using a password).
>
> Another task in the new-committers i
On Saturday November 11 2006 3:51 pm, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> On 11/11/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Or is it ok to do:
> >
> > org.apache.wicket
> > wicket-parent
> > 1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT
>
> From a Maven point of view, this one is preferable so that the groupId
> and artifac
On 11/11/06, Stephen Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Right. But if they specify org.apache.wicket:wicket:1.0, and some
dependency they have has a dependency on
org.apache.incubator.wicket:wicket:1.0-incubating, they'll end up with
both. If the groupId is the same, they'll just the dependency
My understanding is the same as Wendy and Stephen's. Put incubating
in the version (required), not the groupId or artifactId.
Yoav
On 11/11/06, Stephen Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Right. But if they specify org.apache.wicket:wicket:1.0, and some
dependency they have has a dependency on
Right. But if they specify org.apache.wicket:wicket:1.0, and some
dependency they have has a dependency on
org.apache.incubator.wicket:wicket:1.0-incubating, they'll end up with
both. If the groupId is the same, they'll just the dependency they
specified.
-Stephen
On 11/11/06, Martijn Dashorst
On 11/11/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Or is it ok to do:
org.apache.wicket
wicket-parent
1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT
From a Maven point of view, this one is preferable so that the groupId
and artifactId will not have to change after graduation.
It also meets the requirement
On 11/11/06, Stephen Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/11/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> org.apache.incubator.wicket
> wicket-parent
> 1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT
I think that's a bad thing, as upon the first release after
graduation, the groupId will change, and therefore y
On 11/11/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
Is it a requirement or a 'good thing (tm)' to have the following
groupId and version for maven built incubator projects?
e.g. take wicket-parent:
org.apache.incubator.wicket
wicket-parent
1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT
I think that's a b
All,
Is it a requirement or a 'good thing (tm)' to have the following
groupId and version for maven built incubator projects?
e.g. take wicket-parent:
org.apache.incubator.wicket
wicket-parent
1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT
Or is it ok to do:
org.apache.wicket
wicket-parent
1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT
The referred to email 13-oct points to this JIRA issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-881
This says there are some problems with line ends when tools are used to
generate websites.
I tried an experiment: we have a XDOC-style website. I scanned our
XDOC source files and found the
On 11/11/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is an issue with building the site from a windows platform that
> causes the eols to get all mixed up.
See http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html#https-svn, specifically
the last two paragraphs, starting with "Committers wil
11 matches
Mail list logo
