Re: [VOTE] OFBiz Test Snapshot Release: 4.0.0 TS5

2006-11-06 Thread David E Jones
On Nov 5, 2006, at 3:52 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote: On 11/2/06, David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The OFBiz podling (PPMC and community) has reached a consensus internally approving the 4.0.0 TS5 test snapshot release. We are now requesting a vote for review and approval from the

Re: [VOTE] Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release DAS for Java M2 artifacts

2006-11-06 Thread Luciano Resende
One more thing, about the signatures,the public key for verifying the signatures may be found in : https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS - Luciano Resende On 11/6/06, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks Robert for looking into this, more comments inline... Pleas

Re: [VOTE] Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release DAS for Java M2 artifacts

2006-11-06 Thread Luciano Resende
Thanks Robert for looking into this, more comments inline... Please let me know if you have any further questions. On 11/6/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: On 11/5/06, Luciano Resende < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Tuscany PPMC has voted to Release DAS for Java API Imple

Re: Retiring a project [Was: Retiring Agila?]

2006-11-06 Thread J Aaron Farr
On 11/6/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So how do we retire a project? My checklist so far is: * move Agila to the Retired section of the Incubator site, * inform -dev/-user mailing lists (earlier than the rest) * ask that the mailing lists be shutdown, * update the wiki, * update

Re: Retiring a project [Was: Retiring Agila?]

2006-11-06 Thread David Crossley
Henri Yandell wrote: > So how do we retire a project? > > My checklist so far is: > > * move Agila to the Retired section of the Incubator site, > * inform -dev/-user mailing lists (earlier than the rest) > * ask that the mailing lists be shutdown, > * update the wiki, > * update the website, > *

Re: Retiring a project [Was: Retiring Agila?]

2006-11-06 Thread Garrett Rooney
On 11/6/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So how do we retire a project? My checklist so far is: * move Agila to the Retired section of the Incubator site, * inform -dev/-user mailing lists (earlier than the rest) * ask that the mailing lists be shutdown, * update the wiki, * update

Retiring a project [Was: Retiring Agila?]

2006-11-06 Thread Henri Yandell
So how do we retire a project? My checklist so far is: * move Agila to the Retired section of the Incubator site, * inform -dev/-user mailing lists (earlier than the rest) * ask that the mailing lists be shutdown, * update the wiki, * update the website, * move the JIRA project to a Retired cate

Re: [site] can someone fix the permissions...?

2006-11-06 Thread Roy T. Fielding
done. Roy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [site] can someone fix the permissions...?

2006-11-06 Thread Henri Yandell
/www/incubator.apache.org -rw-r--r-- 1 coarincubator 9923 Nov 1 17:04 index.html There's a bunch that need chmod'ing. Not being a part of the unix group is also a prob though. Asking on #asfinfra, Joe says that all Infra need is a cc to the pmc@, rather than something direct from t

Re: clarification on SF license and sandboxes

2006-11-06 Thread Henri Yandell
Thanks for all the replies by the way. Definitely helping me understand the other viewpoint (and try to poke holes :) ). On 11/6/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/6/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How do you know you can use the code to identify and fix the

Re: [site] can someone fix the permissions...?

2006-11-06 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hello Rahul, I have seen that Robert is not part of the incubator UNIX group on people.apache.org. I think that this is the problem. I am part of this group, I was able to do site updates. Regards, Antoine Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On 11/6/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> He

Re: [site] can someone fix the permissions...?

2006-11-06 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 11/6/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Robert, what is exactly your problem with the site ? Needs a chmod -R g+w on site root to be able to deploy. -Rahul I believe you want to be part of the incubator UNIX group. This should be requested by the President of t

Re: [site] can someone fix the permissions...?

2006-11-06 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hello Robert, what is exactly your problem with the site ? I believe you want to be part of the incubator UNIX group. This should be requested by the President of the Incubator PMC. In the meantime, I could run svn update for you under /www/incubator.apache.org. Is this what you would like ?

[VOTE] - Restarting the vote to --- Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2 artifacts

2006-11-06 Thread kelvin goodson
I understand it is good practice to restart a vote if the vote thread becomes heavy with discussion. This is the case with the vote that was begun at http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg11201.html which contains some issues raised and comments to address each of those issu

Re: clarification on SF license and sandboxes

2006-11-06 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 11/6/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/6/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/6/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/6/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 11/6/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm

Re: clarification on SF license and sandboxes

2006-11-06 Thread Craig L Russell
On Nov 6, 2006, at 1:10 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote: On 11/6/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/6/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/6/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm still confused - why do we allow people to upload attachments that

Re: clarification on SF license and sandboxes

2006-11-06 Thread Henri Yandell
On 11/6/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/6/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/6/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/6/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm still confused - why do we allow people to upload attachments

[jira] Resolved: (INCUBATOR-48) remove nameprotect from

2006-11-06 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-48?page=all ] Robert Burrell Donkin resolved INCUBATOR-48. Resolution: Fixed Committed > remove nameprotect from > --- > > Key: INCUBATOR-48 >

Re: [VOTE] Retire AltRMI

2006-11-06 Thread Leo Simons
On Nov 6, 2006, at 9:01 PM, peter royal wrote: The AltRMI podling, has become stagnant. Here is a vote to move it into retirement. [ ] -1 : It lives on, you someone missed my recent commits on it last week [ ] 0 : I don't do fall cleansi

Re: [VOTE] Retire AltRMI

2006-11-06 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, On 11/6/06, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: AltRMI pre-dates mentors. It was one of the very first things to enter the incubator (being an offshot from the ex-Avalon project). Nicola Ken Barozzi is the closest there is, and he's currently emeritus with the foundation. Paul Hammant wa

RE: wikis

2006-11-06 Thread Johnson, Eric
I think you should pick the right tools for the right job Wiki's are great for doing collaborative stuff and are traditionally open to the public at large. Of course, you can limit access to the wiki to just project members if you want to limit who can participate in content generation. They m

Re: [VOTE] Retire AltRMI

2006-11-06 Thread J Aaron Farr
On 11/6/06, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The AltRMI podling, has become stagnant. Here is a vote to move it into retirement. [ ] -1 : It lives on, you someone missed my recent commits on it last week [ ] 0 : I don't do fall cleansing

Re: [VOTE] Retire AltRMI

2006-11-06 Thread peter royal
On Nov 6, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote: I myself am +0 as I don't follow the project but am in favor of fall/spring/periodic cleanups in general. However, I would not be at ease retiring a project without hearing from its mentor, who's yet to vote on this thread. AltRMI pre-dates mento

Re: [VOTE] Retire AltRMI

2006-11-06 Thread Alex Karasulu
peter royal wrote: The AltRMI podling, has become stagnant. Here is a vote to move it into retirement. [ ] -1 : It lives on, you someone missed my recent commits on it last week [ ] 0 : I don't do fall cleansing [X] +1 : Move to retirement A

Re: wikis

2006-11-06 Thread Upayavira
Mike Kienenberger wrote: On 11/6/06, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There seem to be (at least) 2 wiki systems in use at Apache. One is based on moin-moin (python), and is for instance, found at wiki.apache.org/incubator-yoko Another one is based on confluence's wiki, and is found f

Re: wikis

2006-11-06 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 11/6/06, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There seem to be (at least) 2 wiki systems in use at Apache. One is based on moin-moin (python), and is for instance, found at wiki.apache.org/incubator-yoko Another one is based on confluence's wiki, and is found for instance, at cwiki.apac

[site] can someone fix the permissions...?

2006-11-06 Thread robert burrell donkin
please :-) - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: clarification on SF license and sandboxes

2006-11-06 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 11/6/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/6/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/6/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm still confused - why do we allow people to upload attachments that > > are not intended for inclusion? > > > > I can see one

Re: [VOTE] Retire AltRMI

2006-11-06 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, I myself am +0 as I don't follow the project but am in favor of fall/spring/periodic cleanups in general. However, I would not be at ease retiring a project without hearing from its mentor, who's yet to vote on this thread. Yoav On 11/6/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1. Reti

Re: clarification on SF license and sandboxes

2006-11-06 Thread Henri Yandell
On 11/6/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/6/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm still confused - why do we allow people to upload attachments that > are not intended for inclusion? > > I can see one very reasonable reason from a user point of view - the > examp

Re: wikis

2006-11-06 Thread Henri Yandell
I think it comes down to what a wiki means to your community. The classic sense is as a very random user-inclusive system for bits of info. The other is as a much more structured system, possibly for document management. Your description below should go on the Incubator site or wiki - very good s

Re: [VOTE] Retire AltRMI

2006-11-06 Thread Henri Yandell
+1. Retire. On 11/6/06, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The AltRMI podling, has become stagnant. Here is a vote to move it into retirement. [ ] -1 : It lives on, you someone missed my recent commits on it last week [ ] 0 : I don't do f

Re: clarification on SF license and sandboxes

2006-11-06 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 11/6/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm still confused - why do we allow people to upload attachments that are not intended for inclusion? I can see one very reasonable reason from a user point of view - the example they want to upload is business related and so they want to do

wikis

2006-11-06 Thread Marshall Schor
There seem to be (at least) 2 wiki systems in use at Apache. One is based on moin-moin (python), and is for instance, found at wiki.apache.org/incubator-yoko Another one is based on confluence's wiki, and is found for instance, at cwiki.apache.org/geronimo/ The cwiki may have additional cap

Re: [VOTE] Retire AltRMI

2006-11-06 Thread Brett Porter
+1 On 07/11/06, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The AltRMI podling, has become stagnant. Here is a vote to move it into retirement. [ ] -1 : It lives on, you someone missed my recent commits on it last week [ ] 0 : I don't do fall clea

[VOTE] Retire AltRMI

2006-11-06 Thread peter royal
The AltRMI podling, has become stagnant. Here is a vote to move it into retirement. [ ] -1 : It lives on, you someone missed my recent commits on it last week [ ] 0 : I don't do fall cleansing [ ] +1 : Move to retirement Here's my +1 -p

Re: Retiring Agila?

2006-11-06 Thread Henri Yandell
Sounds good. I concur. Can I change the site? Do we change the SVN karma? *bounces up and down* Can I? Can I? On 11/6/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I'm not sure. Since the Jakarta PMC, which is the sponsoring PMC, has voted to retire Agila, I don't think the Incubator PMC need

Re: Retiring Agila?

2006-11-06 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, I'm not sure. Since the Jakarta PMC, which is the sponsoring PMC, has voted to retire Agila, I don't think the Incubator PMC needs an explicit voice, only a note that we concur... Yoav On 11/6/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anyone know what the status is for retiring the Agil

Retiring Agila?

2006-11-06 Thread Henri Yandell
Anyone know what the status is for retiring the Agila podling? Do we need to vote? Does the website just need updating? Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release DAS for Java M2 artifacts

2006-11-06 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 11/5/06, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The Tuscany PPMC has voted to Release DAS for Java API Implementation as part of the M2 release. In accordance with Incubator release procedures we are asking the Incubator PMC to approve this release. +0 (a couple of questions which i'd l

Re: clarification on SF license and sandboxes

2006-11-06 Thread Henri Yandell
On 11/4/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I notice that the current JIRA "attach file" form does not default anything, and requires the submitter to choose explicitly the copyright status for the submission. (I think this is a change from previous behavior, and if so, a very welcome

Re: REMINDER: *** BOARD REPORTS DUE ***

2006-11-06 Thread Henri Yandell
I use 'next month' because it's overloaded for a few different types in the main committee-info.txt file. It means: New projects, projects who report monthly always, projects whose last month implied a need to report again this month and projects who failed to report last month. Usually I add a

[ANNOUNCE] Tuscany C++ Milestone 2 Release

2006-11-06 Thread Andrew Borley
The Apache Tuscany community is pleased to announce its second C++ milestone release. You can download binary and source distributions from: http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/downloads.html For further information, visit our web site at: http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany Introduction =