On 11/1/06, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/1/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Usually, a dumpfile is used rather than a zipped up repository, I think.
>
> I would suggest locating an svn admin who can work with you to do a
> test now - so you'd dump the repository w
(Forwarding from private@ where I asked it the first time and was told
to ask here - and this time I'll use the correct email address so
apologies if a dupe occurs from the previous forward)
I'd like to add a bit to David Reid's marvin script so it notifies
Incubating subprojects that their repor
Let me know if this should be on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd like to add a bit to David Reid's marvin script so it notifies
Incubating subprojects that their reports are due. To do this I'd like
to emulate the committers/board/committee-info.txt file with an
incubator-info.txt file.
At first I thought
Hi all,
based on past comments in this list I'd like to add that this is a
pre-built release (e.g. the objects and Derby demo database are already
set up and packaged in the distribution); we did this because it can
take up to 20 minutes (with slower hardware) to build the whole project
from
The OFBiz podling (PPMC and community) has reached a consensus
internally approving the 4.0.0 TS5 test snapshot release. We are now
requesting a vote for review and approval from the general Incubator
group and the Incubator PMC.
The current incubation docs recommend doing this sort of "t
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-05 04:40:19 -0500 (Sun, 05 Feb 2006) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki
Hi Martin,
Thanks for your comments. They seem to contradict what Henri is
saying. Can we continue this discussion until we reach some conclusion?
Thanks,
Craig
On Nov 1, 2006, at 6:57 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 11/1/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Given that there is a
+1 (non-binding)
Mosur Ravi, Balaji wrote:
Hi,
I have fixed all the issues that were raised during the earlier vote and
I have uploaded the new release at: http://people.apache.org/~bravi
Also, I used the tag
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/yoko/tags/yoko-1.0-incubating
-M1-
On 11/1/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Given that there is a checkbox in JIRA, and the fact that this is
confusing at least, could we get the checkbox removed, or the policy
documented?
The point of the checkbox is that if it's checked, you don't need to ask
further. That Bugz
Given that there is a checkbox in JIRA, and the fact that this is
confusing at least, could we get the checkbox removed, or the policy
documented?
Craig
On Nov 1, 2006, at 4:11 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On 11/1/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's best practice to require th
On 11/1/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's best practice to require that contributions be accompanied by
the checkbox to grant the license. I haven't seen any official Apache
policy guideline on this subject.
Given that Bugzilla doesn't have such a thing - it would seem that it
Robert, thanks for your comments.
I believe the tag issue is now resolved, by earlier notes on this thread.
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200610.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
)
The CCLA issue has also been resolved by jeremy boynes
(http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-com
On 11/1/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Usually, a dumpfile is used rather than a zipped up repository, I think.
I would suggest locating an svn admin who can work with you to do a
test now - so you'd dump the repository without locking it out, load
it up into the test repository, ch
Usually, a dumpfile is used rather than a zipped up repository, I think.
I would suggest locating an svn admin who can work with you to do a
test now - so you'd dump the repository without locking it out, load
it up into the test repository, check it works, so that you know what
to do and minimis
thanks, i'll pursue that
On 01/11/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's best practice to require that contributions be accompanied by
the checkbox to grant the license. I haven't seen any official Apache
policy guideline on this subject.
Is the contributor willing to re-attach t
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-49?page=all ]
Rodent of Unusual Size reassigned INCUBATOR-49:
---
Assignee: Rodent of Unusual Size
> create a status page for UIMA
> -
>
> Key: INCUBA
It's best practice to require that contributions be accompanied by
the checkbox to grant the license. I haven't seen any official Apache
policy guideline on this subject.
Is the contributor willing to re-attach the file to the JIRA, this
time with the checkbox ticked? That's the best way to
Bill,
thanks for your comments. I have made fixes in the trunk for the license
file suggestions you raise where I am certain of the required changes (
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=470007)
and I have raised a JIRA (
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-894) to make cer
A non-binding +1 from me. Any more IPMCers have time to check out and vote
on this so we get the magic 3?
...ant
On 10/24/06, Andrew Borley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We have held a vote on tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org to publish a new
milestone release of
the Tuscany C++ implementation. The v
If I am not mistaken, if it is a patch it is already handles by the apache license itself. If it
isn't a patch, I think it's best to ask for the granting specifically..
Mvgr,
Martin
kelvin goodson wrote:
Can anyone tell me if it's OK to put code into a sandbox that has been
attached to a JIRA
Can anyone tell me if it's OK to put code into a sandbox that has been
attached to a JIRA without granting ASF license?
Thanks
Xavier Hanin wrote:
On 11/1/06, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Xavier Hanin wrote:
> On 11/1/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On 31/10/06, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > Does Ivy want to import history, or just the latest code?
>> >
>> >
>> > An history im
I took a look at this and it looked fine to me.
+1
Paul (wearing my trilby)
On 11/1/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 from me as well (w/ PMC hat on)
On Oct 31, 2006, at 7:44 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> +1 with PMC hat on (having just +1'd with Roller tester hat on over on
> rol
+1 from me as well (w/ PMC hat on)
On Oct 31, 2006, at 7:44 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
+1 with PMC hat on (having just +1'd with Roller tester hat on over on
roller-dev and had nothing but doc quibbles).
Hen
On 10/31/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 from me.
-- dims
On 10/3
On 11/1/06, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Xavier Hanin wrote:
> On 11/1/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On 31/10/06, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > Does Ivy want to import history, or just the latest code?
>> >
>> >
>> > An history import would be nice, b
Xavier Hanin wrote:
On 11/1/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 31/10/06, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does Ivy want to import history, or just the latest code?
>
>
> An history import would be nice, but isn't there a problem with legal
> issues, since old code was not
On 11/1/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 31/10/06, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does Ivy want to import history, or just the latest code?
>
>
> An history import would be nice, but isn't there a problem with legal
> issues, since old code was not under Apache License
On 11/1/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Xavier,
this is certainly something that you are allowed to do.
So I will let infrastructure know that we have the 3 people needed.
Will you do this with your gmail mail address ?
Yes my gmail address is allright for that. Tha
28 matches
Mail list logo
