William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>> Any official IPMC vote should occur on and be archived at one of
>>> its two lists, private@ (for people-stuff) or general@, AFAICT.
>> Personally, I would prefer to have these votes on general@, but Geir
>> e
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
>> Any official IPMC vote should occur on and be archived at one of
>> its two lists, private@ (for people-stuff) or general@, AFAICT.
>
> Personally, I would prefer to have these votes on general@, but Geir
> expressed his reasons in the ab
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Any official IPMC vote should occur on and be archived at one of
> its two lists, private@ (for people-stuff) or general@, AFAICT.
Personally, I would prefer to have these votes on general@, but Geir expressed
his reasons in the absence of a rule to that effect. An
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
I was happy to give a +1 days ago. But that wasn't put on the table.
Ok. I'm going to stick my neck out here, out of my comfort zone.
While bringing Harmony out for graduation was never meant to be a
vehicle for change, it's clear that there a
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
> After I send this message, I'm going to send a message on harmony-dev,
> asking for a vote on graduation. I'm encouraging both the full harmony
> community, and the full incubator community to vote.
I'm confused - this is the IPMC vote or the PPMC vote?
Any officia
david reid wrote:
> BTW, has anyone looked at the files I committed while at AC US?
I was wondering where the commit notices were.
I just found that no one was moderating the commit list. <> I've
fixed that, and moderated through what was pending. Your commit notices
(and who knows how many o
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Last checkpoint, "Has the sponsoring PMC [e.g. Board] voted to accept the
project?" You have a few hours yet to put a resolution on their plate for
next week. And honestly - they would probably table it for review even if
you gave them a month lead time, so might
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>
>> I certainly hope that the concept of 'releasing the code' isn't just a tick
>> mark - I'd imagined (contrary to other proposals flying around) that it's the
>> end goal of nearly any collaborative effort at the ASF, no?
>
> No, becau
On Oct 20, 2006, at 3:34 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
To be clear, our snapshots are more than a simple snap of
Subversion --
we (the Harmony community) discuss the right time to create the
development snapshot to accommodate known instability caused by
work in
flight, publish the snapshot with t
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
I was happy to give a +1 days ago. But that wasn't put on the table.
Ok. I'm going to stick my neck out here, out of my comfort zone.
While bringing Harmony out for graduation was never meant to be a
vehicle for change, it's clear that there are
Tim Ellison wrote:
>
> To be clear, our snapshots are more than a simple snap of Subversion --
> we (the Harmony community) discuss the right time to create the
> development snapshot to accommodate known instability caused by work in
> flight, publish the snapshot with the required incubator disc
I'll echo Greg's sentiment and close with something (hopefully) useful...
Leo Simons wrote:
> On Oct 20, 2006, at 1:24 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On 10/19/06, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Oct 19, 2006, at 3:32 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
>> I didn't vote, I didn't say it wa
Greg Stein wrote:
I was happy to give a +1 days ago. But that wasn't put on the table.
Ok. I'm going to stick my neck out here, out of my comfort zone.
While bringing Harmony out for graduation was never meant to be a
vehicle for change, it's clear that there are opportunities where we can
On 10/20/06, david reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 10/20/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 10/19/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Is this something you would bring over to the ASF, and which we can
>> start
>> > promoting a
On Oct 20, 2006, at 7:14 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
Look. You guys are freakin' nuts.
Assuming this refers to me, given the choice, I think I like the
qualification "silly" better.
Sheesh. Get over it already.
+1, and you too! Let's all go do some actually useful stuff.
- Leo "I don't f
On 10/20/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 20, 2006, at 1:24 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
...
> Or simply for (Incubator) people to observe how you plan to
> organize the
> community to get a release out the door.
That's the jump-through-hoops request right there.
That's not a request.
You're confusing commentary with -1 votes. I don't think anybody said
"woah there, tex. look at this crap. you can't graduate." You asked
for discussion and got it. Did anybody say these things were
showstoppers?
IOW, get over it. Stop with the "woe is me" :-)
On 10/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[E
IANAL. I believe we still don't have definitive templates for these
files :(
On Oct 20, 2006, at 5:30 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ofbiz/trunk/LICENSE
I think this looks good.
and NOTICE
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ofbiz/trunk/NOTICE
On Oct 20, 2006, at 1:24 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
On 10/19/06, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 19, 2006, at 3:32 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
...
> I'd like to ask that those who have asked for a release to assuage
> concerns about community health and capability to please read t
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 10/20/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 10/19/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Is this something you would bring over to the ASF, and which we can
>> start
>> > promoting around the ASF to use?
>>
>> To be honest, I don't bel
OK, it appears that my suggestion to rename was misguided. I am happy
to keep the UIMA name as well.
-Adam
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
+1 for UIMA, even if some other ones are cute.
Keeping UIMA makes it easy (for me) to pull just relevant pages from Google,
Technorati, Simpy, etc. instead of al
On 10/20/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm pretty resigned to the fact that we're not going to be able to
present a resolution to the board this month for Harmony. I do keep a
flicker of hope, mainly because I'm an eternal optimist.
I do think it's a shame, because I believ
On 10/20/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/19/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this something you would bring over to the ASF, and which we can start
> promoting around the ASF to use?
To be honest, I don't believe it's a good fit. Not every project
needs
Just so it is crystal clear: I am neither looking for a quota, nor do I
have specific pet projects I want to see graduate. I simply view the
current backlog as unhealthy.
Just for fun, I wrote a silly little script, attached below. It
computes two types of averages for projects currently in
Greg Stein wrote:
> On 10/19/06, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right. I said it would be useful to see if the community can make it
> happen. I know that *some individuals* can, but that is different. I
> didn't vote, I didn't say it was a requirement, just asked: why can't
> you pul
25 matches
Mail list logo
