+1 (binding) on the revised plugins that include the license and notice
files.
Craig
On 9/26/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Trinidad community voted on and approved to release the the maven2
plugins as a milestone1 release. These plugins are required for the maven2
bui
I am with Alan on that - Leo's comment when put in perspective equals
to "Incubator should not have any guidelines at all for the new
projects, and every vote is decided based on the people's mood at the
moment". That's probably not what he meant..?
But in any event clear guidelines includi
On Oct 13, 2006, at 12:16 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
On Oct 12, 2006, at 5:13 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Can we agree that regardless of which style one might prefer the
packaging,
there are multiple valid approaches, and that this level of
difference
should not be a release criteria for the In
On Oct 13, 2006, at 6:28 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 10/12/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Other than wait for Robert's scanning tool? :-)
no need to wait: get the source (http://code.google.com/p/arat/) and
run the RAT against the source distribution (i'll improved b
Finally I tried both options using the ASL2, nothing happens (seems like a good
sign). Not documented so far ... I would say ...
Forget it for the moment...
Jacques
> Jacopo,
>
> I just realized that in Eclipse 3.2 you can define your "own" licence
> (Windows/ Preference) and I think use it wit
Jacopo,
I just realized that in Eclipse 3.2 you can define your "own" licence (Windows/
Preference) and I think use it with the "Fix
Copyrights" and "Advanced Fix Copyrights" options.
I tried it before but whitout having defined "my" licence (so I had bad
results). Have you tried it even if I gu
