Out of curiosity - has any such "internal decision" been made? I can
not find anything in either of the archives - private or dev.
Cheers,
Berin
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I will defer to those on the PPMC that had "issues"
with the list.
On Sep 29, 2006, at 11:31 AM, Dan Diephouse wrote:
I will defer to those on the PPMC that had "issues"
with the list.
On Sep 29, 2006, at 11:31 AM, Dan Diephouse wrote:
Hi Jim,
Can you please explain what the criteria was for removing people
from the comitter list? Can you also detail who was removed? Can
you also explain why this hasn't b
Hi Jim,
Can you please explain what the criteria was for removing people from
the comitter list? Can you also detail who was removed? Can you also
explain why this hasn't been communicated to everyone on the dev list so
far? And why I have only heard about the final decision third hand from
t
Without discussing anything regarding the initial list
and who should or should not have been on it, it needs
to be reminded that the bar to committership for Incubator
podlings is necessarily a bit lower than for real
PMCs. After all, one thing the podling must work on is
increasing the community
Redhat were one of the supporters of the Celtixfire incubator project
and discussed with the proposers to add Kevin Conner and myself to
the list of initial commiters. As part of this, our names were
included in the proposal. Both Kevin and I are working on Redhat
related projects and see a
