Thanks to all for clarifications. I am clear about what I can help now.
Cheers,
Bo
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 9/27/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 27, 2006, at 3:10 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> it is very rare for a non-committer to act as release manager.
Yeah, I
Robert,
Sorry for the delayed response - hardware problem. I'll rework the release
later today, based on your comments.
regards,
John Kaputin.,
On 9/27/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/27/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Woden developer communi
On 9/28/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 28, 2006, at 9:20 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> I took the liberty of looking at the Struts 2 release, and they don't
> have license headers in the aforementioned files.
That's a Bad Thing(tm).
Tattletale! :)
Don
LSD
--
On 9/28/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert, thanks for hooking in.
I am wondering if there are so big concerns by the rest of the Incubator PMC
that there is no vote here.
nope: it's safe to assume that a lack of noise indicates inertia
the only circumstance that i can
On Sep 28, 2006, at 9:20 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
My question is, should all these [source] files get the ASL headers?
All source files should have appropriate headers. If its apache-owned,
ASL-licensed source, it should have the ASL header.
This would
be a hard hit for the embedded JavaSc
On 9/27/06, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2. The first paragraph explains it to a layperson
thanks - much better.
but i don't see at all in terms of explaining it to laypersons. a
project that cannot explain itself clearly in a paragraph doesn't
understand itself.
[X] +1 Accept U
On 9/28/06, David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any reason for this?
i have my reasons (but ask no more ATM)
We discussed it internally and it turns out
these files are not used by default, and while might be useful for
some are certainly not necessary in OFBiz and if someone did need
On Sep 28, 2006, at 8:05 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 9/28/06, Jacopo Cappellato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Robert,
I'm one of the OFBiz committers and I'd like to thank you for your
great
scrutiny: this is very helpful and we are currently working to fix
all the
issues that yo
On 9/28/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/28/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Especially the apt format doesn't work
> together with comments.
comments work fine with xml and fml. i'm surprised that apt doesn't
allow comments. perhaps jason or brett migh
On 9/28/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I just ran the tool on the Wicket 1.2.2 distribution, just to see how
we stack up and how much we need to change our release.
I came up with some questions when I read report that came out of the
tool, and would like to see what the po
On 9/28/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/28/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Garrett Rooney wrote:
> > PPMCs are formed for an incubating project, and exactly how
> > that works tends to differ a bit between projects. Some mentors start
> > off with just
On 9/28/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
> PPMCs are formed for an incubating project, and exactly how
> that works tends to differ a bit between projects. Some mentors start
> off with just the mentors on the PPMC, and then invite project members
> as time
Hi,
I just ran the tool on the Wicket 1.2.2 distribution, just to see how
we stack up and how much we need to change our release.
I came up with some questions when I read report that came out of the
tool, and would like to see what the policy is on these matters.
- the tool flags all HTML docu
On 9/28/06, Jacopo Cappellato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Robert,
I'm one of the OFBiz committers and I'd like to thank you for your great
scrutiny: this is very helpful and we are currently working to fix all the
issues that you (and others in this list) have found.
Please see my comments in
On 9/28/06, Jacopo Cappellato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Robert,
I'm one of the OFBiz committers and I'd like to thank you for your great
scrutiny: this is very helpful and we are currently working to fix all the
issues that you (and others in this list) have found.
great :-)
these problem
Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 9/28/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> thinking about whether there's a need to wait to release until the
> PPMC is fully formed and representation of the podling committers.
>
> PPMCs are typically filled up relatively late in t
On 9/28/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> thinking about whether there's a need to wait to release until the
> PPMC is fully formed and representation of the podling committers.
>
> PPMCs are typically filled up relatively late in the process - towards
>
robert burrell donkin wrote:
thinking about whether there's a need to wait to release until the
PPMC is fully formed and representation of the podling committers.
PPMCs are typically filled up relatively late in the process - towards
graduation. (whether this is a good idea, i'm not sure.) if th
Hi,
+1.
I was on vacation for a couple of weeks, gradually catching up, but
the release looks good to me so far with the updated copyright
notices. I still haven't extensively tested it.
Yoav
On 9/28/06, drtobes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since there's been no negative feedback and I don't re
Since there's been no negative feedback and I don't really want this
vote to fail, and I am under the assumption that PMC members are quite
busy at the moment, I'm giving this vote another 48 hours.
We currently are 1 vote short of the required 3 to release the Apache
Lokahi M01 build.
Those wit
On Sep 27, 2006, at 6:30 AM, Bozhong Lin wrote:
Hi,
As I previously posted email on cxf-dev, I am very keen in
contributing to CeltiXfire release management and other project
management related stuff. From the Apache release process document
[1], I am not sure what qualification/requirem
Hi Robert,
I'm one of the OFBiz committers and I'd like to thank you for your great
scrutiny: this is very helpful and we are currently working to fix all the
issues that you (and others in this list) have found.
Please see my comments inline:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
>
> ***IMPORTANT***
> h
On Sep 28, 2006, at 9:08 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
NOTICE should not have the list of licenses that apply - that's for
the
LICENSE file.
NOTICE should contain any required informational notices required
by those
licenses. For example, JDBM (the last entry in LICENSE) requires
in Clau
On 9/26/06, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[X] +1 Accept UIMA as an Incubator podling
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the following reason:
As before. -- justin
On 9/28/06, David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've done another pass on the LICENSE file to hopefully address this
problem, but I'm not really sure that I understood exactly what it
needs to look like, so feedback on this would be great.
The updated LICENSE and NOTICE files are availabl
I've done another pass on the LICENSE file to hopefully address this
problem, but I'm not really sure that I understood exactly what it
needs to look like, so feedback on this would be great.
The updated LICENSE and NOTICE files are available here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator
+1..
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
The Trinidad community voted on and approved to release the the maven2
plugins as a milestone1 release. These plugins are required for the maven2
build of the "core" code of the Trinidad Podling. To fulfill the incubator
guides, we like to ask you gu
27 matches
Mail list logo
