On Thursday 14 September 2006 01:45, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > I am curious to know how did Mime4J go from SourceForge to the
> > Apache James project, and apparently not passing the Incubator??
>
> It is a gray area, but when it was discussed the consensus was that it was
> the work of ASF Commit
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-05 04:40:19 -0500 (Sun, 05 Feb 2006) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 9/13/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> personally speaking, i would not support the gradudation any project
>> that has not demonstrated that they understand the apache releases
>> policy. doing this is much easier and quicker than creating a prop
On 9/13/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
however IMO the IP clearance document should still be created and
committed so that it's easy to track the origins of the code.
questions about provinence can sometimes be raised years later and it
has sometimes proved difficult to trac
On 9/13/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is a gray area, but when it was discussed the consensus was that it was
the work of ASF Committers and being brought into the JAMES community as a
separate codebase, but within a single community of Committers, not a
separate project or su
On 9/13/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
personally speaking, i would not support the gradudation any project
that has not demonstrated that they understand the apache releases
policy. doing this is much easier and quicker than creating a proper
release. just nominate a releas
On 9/13/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the source license headers are good enough for me now (i'd would like
build.properties and build.xml to have license headers)
Noted, I'll update svn tonight before I forget.
it would probably be a good idea to document the build pr
On 9/13/06, Steve Toback <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We have updated the release with the appropriate copyright notifications:
http://people.apache.org/~toback/lokahi-incubating-M01.tar.gz
http://people.apache.org/~toback/lokahi-incubating-M01.tar.gz.asc
Md5: 05b2cbccb974e7cd67afa3efa9000b41
On 9/13/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 13, 2006, at 10:24 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> since we started checking releases in detail, it's become clear that
> most projects struggle to create a compliant release at the first
> attempt. nearly every first attempt c
We have updated the release with the appropriate copyright notifications:
http://people.apache.org/~toback/lokahi-incubating-M01.tar.gz
http://people.apache.org/~toback/lokahi-incubating-M01.tar.gz.asc
Md5: 05b2cbccb974e7cd67afa3efa9000b41
Please vote to release this in it's current form.
Th
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 02:05:08PM -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> So the real question, in my view, is whether or not they demonstrate an
> awareness that there ARE issues, and that they may CHANGE, and are being
> RESPONSIBLE about making sure that what they do is in compliance with ASF
> policy
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> IMO the question is not about performing a release (which is high
> ceremony) but about knowing how to perform a release that complies
> with ASF policy.
And, as I noted in my Felix-specific reply, over the past few years, we have
changed licensing, copyright notic
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> i do not believe that having made a release should be a requirement.
I agree. And it would be somewhat ironic to make that a requirement,
although I do understand the reasons behind the assertions made by those who
are concerned.
Looking at Felix, I see Alex, Upay
On Sep 13, 2006, at 10:24 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 9/13/06, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
J Aaron Farr wrote:
> On 9/13/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 9/12/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > As Leo pointed out, 'codebase quality' is
> I am curious to know how did Mime4J go from SourceForge to the
> Apache James project, and apparently not passing the Incubator??
It is a gray area, but when it was discussed the consensus was that it was
the work of ASF Committers and being brought into the JAMES community as a
separate codebas
Hello, everyone.
In conjunction with our proposal to Apache for the UIMA framework, we
have submitted a Charter to develop a community based standard for the
UIMA Specification (not implementation) to OASIS (www.oasis-open.org).
OASIS is a standards development organization with a good track
On 9/13/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 13, 2006, at 2:54 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 9/12/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As Leo pointed out, 'codebase quality' is not a graduation
>> criteria. And
>> (hopefully) with Upayvira as the initial PMC Chair
On 9/13/06, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
J Aaron Farr wrote:
> On 9/13/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 9/12/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > As Leo pointed out, 'codebase quality' is not a graduation criteria.
>> And
>> > (hopefully) with Upayv
J Aaron Farr wrote:
On 9/13/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/12/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As Leo pointed out, 'codebase quality' is not a graduation criteria.
And
> (hopefully) with Upayvira as the initial PMC Chair, I am not worried
that the
> PMC wi
On 9/13/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/12/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As Leo pointed out, 'codebase quality' is not a graduation criteria. And
> (hopefully) with Upayvira as the initial PMC Chair, I am not worried that the
> PMC will overlook release req
On Sep 13, 2006, at 2:54 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 9/12/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As Leo pointed out, 'codebase quality' is not a graduation
criteria. And
(hopefully) with Upayvira as the initial PMC Chair, I am not
worried that the
PMC will overlook release requir
On 9/12/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/12/06, Raphaël Luta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Discussions have already happened in both the Grafitto and the
> Jackrabbit communities to "move" development of the JCR mapping
> functionality into the Jaskrabbit community and the fee
22 matches
Mail list logo
