> I want to add some code that I've developed outside of the
> ASF
> Does that code have to go through the incubator?
On the one hand, we did exactly that with contributions to the HTTP Server,
JAMES, and other projects. On the other hand, you are contributing your own
code under your CLA, so on
On 8/29/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
Suppose the Tapestry TLP project creates a new subproject called "Tapestry
Commons." Then, I want to add some code that I've developed outside of the
ASF to the Tapestry Commons subproject. Does that code have to go through
the incubator
I've looked at the incubator pages and can't find guidance on how to set up a jira or bug reporting system for a new project. It's absent from the incubation/Incubation_Policy area, and the general "request project resources" doesn't seem to have any information either.If there's consensus on addin
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-44?page=comments#action_12431303
]
Craig Russell commented on INCUBATOR-44:
One of the issues I've noticed in incubation is that the incubating project
often does not know who can help in
All,
Suppose the Tapestry TLP project creates a new subproject called "Tapestry
Commons." Then, I want to add some code that I've developed outside of the
ASF to the Tapestry Commons subproject. Does that code have to go through
the incubator? My guess is that it does so that we avoid licensing
+1 (non-binding)
Craig
On Aug 28, 2006, at 12:19 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin (JIRA) wrote:
[policy neutral] consistent use of term
---
Key: INCUBATOR-42
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
INCUBATOR-42
P
+1 (non-binding)
Craig
On Aug 28, 2006, at 12:23 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin (JIRA) wrote:
[policy neutral] cut line which doesn't make much sense
---
Key: INCUBATOR-43
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/brows
On 8/29/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Huh? Why? What kind of data is in there that needs to be private?
You mean wait 9 months for a TLP to start operating? Or wait implementing new
legal policies for about 6 months are they're ratifieid?
Huh?
The minutes are generally approved at
On 8/29/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(moved from [EMAIL PROTECTED] since I imagine some people want to say
something who don't read that)
? Um, I don't think you moved it anywhere. ;-)
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 11:39:52AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 8/28/06, robert burre
In Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 01:00:28PM +0100, Danny Angus wrote:
> I think the time might be right to provoke a dispassionate discussion
> about our use of proper names for project names.
Thanks.
> That there be a new category of minimum exit requirements named
> somthing like "Ethical considerations
Hi,
+0 on ethical criteria in general as long as they're very clearly
defined: it's very easy to get into gray areas because what is or
isn't offensive and what is or isn't "established" is subjective. I
don't necessarily want to go down the route of having Wikipedia-like
guidelines (see http://e
Hi,
I think the time might be right to provoke a dispassionate discussion
about our use of proper names for project names.
I'd like to start by suggesting the following for discussion;
That there be a new category of minimum exit requirements named
somthing like "Ethical considerations" and tha
(moved from [EMAIL PROTECTED] since I imagine some people want to say
something who don't read that)
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 11:39:52AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 8/28/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >i have one or two board resolutions that it would be a good idea
13 matches
Mail list logo
