Re: Glasgow - new name proposal

2006-08-08 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
"tinkiri"? Tin is tin .. kiri is milk. Tinkiri literally means milk in a tin but really its used to refer to condensed milk.. which is the kind of milk that comes in a tin. Condensed milk is of course a sweet, gooey substance that's like a glue (very sticky). Connects with everything it touches ;-

Re: Glasgow - new name proposal

2006-08-08 Thread Carl Trieloff
Some ideas that have come from random places / discussions / water cooler / ... Carl. Digery http://www.arts.ualberta.ca/~tbutler/trips/Oz-2006Jan/05-Oz-photos/wildlife%20-%20digery%20doo.jpg "natter" is the English borrowed word you are looking for to describe it Tjata (swedish fo

Re: Glasgow - new name proposal

2006-08-08 Thread Rich Bowen
On Aug 8, 2006, at 21:12, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Sean (Sam) Joyce: this picking names is hard. I've though of about 20 so far today but each one already has some links to software projects or companies. Except that it feels a bit unwieldy, "Champollion" could be used in honor of the ge

RE: Glasgow - new name proposal

2006-08-08 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Sean (Sam) Joyce: > this picking names is hard. I've though of about 20 so far today > but each one already has some links to software projects or companies. Except that it feels a bit unwieldy, "Champollion" could be used in honor of the gent would decoded the Rosetta stone. Alternatively, and

Re: Glasgow - new name proposal

2006-08-08 Thread Yoav Shapira
You may wish to search the [EMAIL PROTECTED] archives for some recent name suggestion. Some people had creative, if a bit eclectic, suggestions that did not conflict with registered trademarks or other software projects ;) On 8/8/06, Sakala, Adinarayana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There is a

RE: Glasgow - new name proposal

2006-08-08 Thread Sakala, Adinarayana
There is a sourceforge project called Cricket [1]. So even this one is out of the pool :) [1] - http://cricket.sourceforge.net/ > -Original Message- > From: Eelco Hillenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 5:17 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re

Re: [Proposal] Blaze

2006-08-08 Thread Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart
[sorry for the delayed response but just catching up on this thread...] This seems a good moment to remind that we hope this issue has been fixed for all Java EE APIs through Project GlassFish. We are aware of a few APIs that have not yet been pushed out under CDDL but our plan is to complete

Re: Glasgow - new name proposal

2006-08-08 Thread Eelco Hillenius
It'll be pretty hard to get a good search engine ranking for that though. Eelco On 8/8/06, Sakala, Adinarayana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I like Cricket. "Apache Cricket", I already started to think of some cool logos for this ;) - Adi > -Original Message- > From: Joyce, Sean (Sam) >

RE: Glasgow - new name proposal

2006-08-08 Thread Sakala, Adinarayana
I like Cricket. "Apache Cricket", I already started to think of some cool logos for this ;) - Adi > -Original Message- > From: Joyce, Sean (Sam) > Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 4:06 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Glasgow - new name proposal > > > Hmm, this pickin

Re: Too many licenses? Was: [vote] Accept Glasgow

2006-08-08 Thread Carl Trieloff
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Last and final objection, I want to make sure I am not missing something... the contract between the spec participants is or is not public? If public, was there a link I missed? If so, can it be added to the proposal for completeness sake? Bill William, to thi

Re: [rant] seperate policy change from proposal discussion

2006-08-08 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Aug 8, 2006, at 12:57 AM, Brett Porter wrote: +42 (which, I believe, is also the average number of messages per single thread on this list at the moment). Anyway, I'm definitely in agreement with "versioning" policy. Podlings should comply to the latest agreed set at the time of entry, and t

RE: Glasgow - new name proposal

2006-08-08 Thread Joyce, Sean \(Sam\)
Hmm, this picking names is hard. I've though of about 20 so far today but each one already has some links to software projects or companies. How about "Cricket" Sam. > -Original Message- > From: Gwyn Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 08 August 2006 20:58 > To: general@incubator.apa

Re: Glasgow - new name proposal

2006-08-08 Thread Gwyn Evans
Could be worryingly close to "Twisted" - http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/wiki/TwistedProject /Gwyn On 08/08/06, Joyce, Sean (Sam) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Folks, As we appear to need a new name for Glasgow, I've got a proposal: "Twister" Thoughts? Regards, Sam. -- Download Wi

Re: Glasgow - new name proposal

2006-08-08 Thread Davanum Srinivas
FYI, Twister was a SF project [1] that started incubation as Agila [2] [1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/wf-twister/ [2] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=incubator-general&w=2&r=1&s=twister&q=b On 8/8/06, Joyce, Sean (Sam) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Folks, As we appear to need a new name

Glasgow - new name proposal

2006-08-08 Thread Joyce, Sean \(Sam\)
Hi Folks, As we appear to need a new name for Glasgow, I've got a proposal: "Twister" Thoughts? Regards, Sam.

Re: [rant] seperate policy change from proposal discussion

2006-08-08 Thread David Blevins
A big +1. And I also really like the idea that the proposals contain the version number they were written against. -David On Aug 8, 2006, at 6:34 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote: On 8/8/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Perhaps we should try and seperate this somewhat more rigidly. Eg we c

Re: [rant] seperate policy change from proposal discussion

2006-08-08 Thread J Aaron Farr
On 8/8/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Perhaps we should try and seperate this somewhat more rigidly. Eg we could have a "released" version of all the things we want a project to do and/or comply with (this is our website) and we could have an "in progress" version of the same thing (t

Re: Too many licenses? Was: [vote] Accept Glasgow

2006-08-08 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Carl Trieloff wrote: >> William, >> >> I have made some edits to the wiki on the Mechanisms for feedback[...] > > Although the objectionable language still appears on the spec parties' web > sites[...] Whoa - my bad; I got this wrong and the web sites beat us both...

Re: Too many licenses? Was: [vote] Accept Glasgow

2006-08-08 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Carl Trieloff wrote: > > William, > > I have made some edits to the wiki on the Mechanisms for feedback > section to clean up the language, based on some of the misunderstanding > and to reflect the discussion from the list onto the wiki. Tried to keep > it short, but can edit more in if require

Re: [rant] seperate policy change from proposal discussion

2006-08-08 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
> On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 23:24 -0700, Leo Simons wrote: >> >> It must be sooo frustrating for new projects coming in. They read the >> websites, read the mail archives, talk to loads and loads of people, >> and when they think they get it all right they send in a proposal. And >> then, more often t

Re: Jini?

2006-08-08 Thread Mark Brouwer
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: I know changing the name is a *really* tough thing for Jini. However, is Jini a *technology* or an *implementation*? If its the prior I'm afraid our current guidelines are not to do technology names. I understand for those not very involved with the Jini Technology i

Re: [rant] seperate policy change from proposal discussion

2006-08-08 Thread Brett Porter
+42 (which, I believe, is also the average number of messages per single thread on this list at the moment). Anyway, I'm definitely in agreement with "versioning" policy. Podlings should comply to the latest agreed set at the time of entry, and then a more recent one on graduation (so even if som

Re: [rant] seperate policy change from proposal discussion

2006-08-08 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 01:17:25PM +0530, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > +1 for another list for proposal submissions- [EMAIL PROTECTED] and > for this to remain for the current purpose. -1. Eww. Please not another list. Folks just need to exhibit common sense towards proposals. -- justin -

Re: [rant] seperate policy change from proposal discussion

2006-08-08 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
ABSOLUTELY +1! I also feel really terrible about our "unprofessionalism" when it comes to handling proposals. +1 for another list for proposal submissions- [EMAIL PROTECTED] and for this to remain for the current purpose. Sanjiva. On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 23:24 -0700, Leo Simons wrote: > > It must