Let me try to address your concerns.
> And as far as the openness of the spec itself - this is, too, an issue.
> I will continue voting -1 until we really determine that - unlike JCP -
> we can have a no-NDA scenario with respect to TCKs etc. And that,
> unlike Oasis, the implementation is covere
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> [...]
> I did not write that actually. I'm sorry I hijacked the VOTE thread.
> It's one of the (hopefully) few things to get used to over at Apache,
> as at Wicket we aren't that formal about it.
First, I generally agreed with this (which was what you said in an earlier
po
