Re: Renaming Heraldry

2006-07-03 Thread Paul Fremantle
But how do you pronounce ibid? And is it different in England and America? Eye-bid or ib-id? I just throw that in after Synapse (Sine-apse or Sin-apse) Paul On 6/29/06, David Strauss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Recordon, David wrote: >>From conversations at ApacheCon, and gentle nudging at dinn

Re: [PROPOSAL] CeltiXfire Project

2006-07-03 Thread Craig L Russell
Hi Dan, I have to agree that if an existing code base is migrated to Apache, it should not mean that all maintenance ceases on the existing code. There are good reasons for projects dependent on the existing code base to be able to stay on it and not move to the Apache line just because t

Re: Renaming Heraldry

2006-07-03 Thread David Strauss
Recordon, David wrote: >>From conversations at ApacheCon, and gentle nudging at dinner last night from >>Danese Cooper, it sounds like we should come up with a better name. The >>current thought is "Ibid". So it works in "ID" and has a good geeky literary >>reference. > > Thoughts? > I like

RE: Renaming Heraldry

2006-07-03 Thread Bill Washburn
Nice. It is short, recognizable, even attractive. Is it truly geeky enough, though? It seems almost playful. And it's a terrific morph of an abbreviation nearly dead. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Recordon, David Sent: Thurs

Re: Renaming Heraldry

2006-07-03 Thread Johannes Ernst
3i is the name of a rather large venture and other capital firm.But I3 might work.On Jun 30, 2006, at 11:22, Drummond Reed wrote:I too like Heraldry (why exactly don’t folks want to use it?) But if we must rename it, a suggestion is “3i” (interoperable Internet identity). =Drummond From: [EMAIL PRO

Re: Renaming Heraldry

2006-07-03 Thread john kemp
Johannes Ernst wrote: > 3i is the name of a rather large venture and other capital firm. > But I3 might work. I3: Can anyone say "identity 3.0" ;) - JohnK > > On Jun 30, 2006, at 11:22, Drummond Reed wrote: > >> I too like Heraldry (why exactly don’t folks want to use it?) >> >> >> >> But if

[jira] Commented: (INCUBATOR-20) Changed informations for ADF project

2006-07-03 Thread JIRA
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-20?page=comments#action_12419024 ] Matthias Weßendorf commented on INCUBATOR-20: - thx! > Changed informations for ADF project > > > Key: INCUBATOR-20

[jira] Closed: (INCUBATOR-20) Changed informations for ADF project

2006-07-03 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-20?page=all ] Robert Burrell Donkin closed INCUBATOR-20: -- Resolution: Fixed committed please check the site visually since the patch didn't apply very well and i had to finish it by hand >

Re: Standards Documentation [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] Heraldry Identity Project]

2006-07-03 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 7/2/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/30/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > robert burrell donkin wrote: > > > > pages tend to be collected within directories so probably > > www.apache.org/dev/standards.html would be a better location but > sounds

Re: Graduate Synapse - was Re: [VOTE] Release Synapse

2006-07-03 Thread Paul Fremantle
The page is now updated and seems to have made it through to the website. Paul On 7/3/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for pointing that out. The PMC vote has now completed. I'll update right now. Paul On 7/3/06, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The referenced web

Re: Graduate Synapse - was Re: [VOTE] Release Synapse

2006-07-03 Thread Paul Fremantle
Thanks for pointing that out. The PMC vote has now completed. I'll update right now. Paul On 7/3/06, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The referenced web site has the following: "Organizational acceptance of responsibility for the project * Has the receiving PMC voted to accept it?

Re: Graduate Synapse - was Re: [VOTE] Release Synapse

2006-07-03 Thread Dion Gillard
The referenced web site has the following: "Organizational acceptance of responsibility for the project * Has the receiving PMC voted to accept it? In Progress " Is this up to date? On 7/4/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Someone pointed out to me that the original $subject mi

Graduate Synapse - was Re: [VOTE] Release Synapse

2006-07-03 Thread Paul Fremantle
Someone pointed out to me that the original $subject might be confusing. Paul On 7/3/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 from me. Paul On 6/30/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > >...ant > > On 6/27/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: 'protocols' sub-module of MINA

2006-07-03 Thread peter royal
On Jul 3, 2006, at 12:10 PM, James Strachan wrote: On 7/3/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How timely...i've just spent the last hour or two today looking at AsyncWeb after Dan Diephouse telling me about it at ApacheCon in Dublin. I'm interested how this could be used by Tuscany or Syn

Re: [VOTE] Release Synapse

2006-07-03 Thread Paul Fremantle
+1 from me. Paul On 6/30/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 (non-binding) ...ant On 6/27/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 from me. > > On 6/26/06, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The Synapse incubator would like to ask the Incubator PMC to >

Re: 'protocols' sub-module of MINA

2006-07-03 Thread James Strachan
On 7/3/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How timely...i've just spent the last hour or two today looking at AsyncWeb after Dan Diephouse telling me about it at ApacheCon in Dublin. I'm interested how this could be used by Tuscany or Synapse, so moving it to Apache sounds good to me. Anyo

Re: 'protocols' sub-module of MINA

2006-07-03 Thread peter royal
On Jul 3, 2006, at 11:52 AM, Trustin Lee wrote: Bringing in AsyncWeb and other possible future contributions will make this project quite too big to fit into a subproject. We might need an incubation process to find a better place for MINA eventually. Any idea? I will CC this message to

Re: Looking for help mentoring Graffito.

2006-07-03 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On 7/2/06, Raphaël Luta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Due to my numerous other activities, I feel I cannot provide alone the adequate mentoring required by this project and I am looking for additionnal mentors to help grow the Graffito community and graduate it. I can't promise too many spare

Re: 'protocols' sub-module of MINA

2006-07-03 Thread ant elder
How timely...i've just spent the last hour or two today looking at AsyncWeb after Dan Diephouse telling me about it at ApacheCon in Dublin. I'm interested how this could be used by Tuscany or Synapse, so moving it to Apache sounds good to me. ...ant On 7/3/06, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: 'protocols' sub-module of MINA

2006-07-03 Thread Trustin Lee
On 7/4/06, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jul 3, 2006, at 11:17 AM, Irving, Dave wrote: >> So, my proposal is, how about we start creating module(s) in >> MINA for protocols? >> > > Of course, Im biased - but It would be a shame if we re-wrote http > support on top of Mina over again,

Re: atom feeds for projects

2006-07-03 Thread Paul Querna
robert burrell donkin wrote: > On 7/2/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> robert burrell donkin wrote: >> > the mailing list archives at apache run on mod_mbox which also supplies >> > atom >> > feeds for these lists. i've added the feed from general to the front >> page >> > and think it

Re: atom feeds for projects

2006-07-03 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 7/2/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: robert burrell donkin wrote: > the mailing list archives at apache run on mod_mbox which also supplies > atom > feeds for these lists. i've added the feed from general to the front page > and think it'd be cool to add feeds to the pages in projects