robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 6/22/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matthias,
FYI, Once you are an Apache committer. You are one for life. Unless
you voluntarily peition people to revoke your id and karma.
-1
committing is just a privilage with no legal status. commit stat
On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 13:28 -0400, Dan Diephouse wrote:
> Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> > I thought XFire does all these specs too
> > (http://xfire.codehaus.org/Stack+Comparison; except for obviously
> > JAX-WSA as that's not even done yet). So what part of Celtix (other than
> > the name) is in Ce
Hola,
I also wanted to chime in on another aspect of this besides everything
Martin, Phil, et al have said. (and I completely agree with their
cautions / questions).
Having a regularly-scheduled meeting could easily feel like an
obligation, as in if you don't participate in the meetings you're no
Thanks for your extreme patience in the matter of
the proposed Kabuki contribution to the Apache
Incubator. The original delay was due to cleaning
up code, writing documentation, and other activities
to make the code ready for check-in to the Apache
source code repository.
While preparing the Kabu
On 6/23/06, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Being there in real time is also difficult.
This effectively cuts out a lot of people. For partly selfish
reasons, I would hate to see apache projects trend toward more
synchronous communications requirements.
That is why the summary i
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
I thought XFire does all these specs too
(http://xfire.codehaus.org/Stack+Comparison; except for obviously
JAX-WSA as that's not even done yet). So what part of Celtix (other than
the name) is in Celtixfire in that case?
Celtix has JAX-WS nearly fully done (hard to
