Re: Incubator artifacts and repositories

2006-06-17 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Saturday 17 June 2006 15:24, Brett Porter wrote: > Why would a project cut another release just because they've > graduated? I can't think of a particular reason - is there something > you had in mind that changes? That it is now a Apache project and all that comes with that. Changing the labe

[jira] Commented: (INCUBATOR-21) Jira required for incubating project Abdera

2006-06-17 Thread Gavin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-21?page=comments#action_12416656 ] Gavin commented on INCUBATOR-21: Sorry, close this, I'll re-create it on @infra instead. > Jira required for incubating project Abdera > ---

RE: [jira] Created: (INCUBATOR-21) Jira required for incubating project Abdera

2006-06-17 Thread Gav....
Should this have gone on @infra Jira request instead? If so let me know. Gav... > -Original Message- > From: Gavin (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, 18 June 2006 10:15 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [jira] Created: (INCUBATOR-21) Jira required for incubat

[jira] Created: (INCUBATOR-21) Jira required for incubating project Abdera

2006-06-17 Thread Gavin (JIRA)
Jira required for incubating project Abdera --- Key: INCUBATOR-21 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-21 Project: Incubator Type: New Feature Reporter: Gavin Priority: Critical Hope this is the right

RE: Lucene.NET Jira Emails?

2006-06-17 Thread George Aroush
Thanks Hoss. If this is the case, who ever has the karma to fix this, can you take care of it? Also, I can't figure out how to assign, close or even edit a JIRA issue opened against Lucene.Net. For example, take a look at: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-6 and I can't see anything

RE: Lucene.NET Jira Emails?

2006-06-17 Thread George Aroush
Hi Chris, I don't think this is intentional. Something is broken in the JIRA setup. I have posted this email on general@incubator.apache.org to see if folks there may know what's the problem and fix it. Thanks for noticing -- George -Original Message- From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMA

Re: Incubator artifacts and repositories

2006-06-17 Thread Brett Porter
Hi Noel, I'm expecting you'll probably respond to my other mail too, but I just wanted to pick up on this point. On 17/06/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Distinguishing between what was put out during Incubation and what was put out post-Incubation is a good thing. Why would a

RE: Incubator artifacts and repositories

2006-06-17 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Hiram Chirino wrote: > As I see it, it comes down to a choice of having the user configure > his pom with either > 1) an artifact id or group id or version id that > includes "incubator" in it. > or > 2) a repository id that include "incubator" in it. Or, as I see it, both. Since the arti