I'll be faxing my CLA in tomorrow. Rob should be sending his in soon as
well.
Paul Querna wrote:
>[snip]
> Mailing lists:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-829
>
> Repository:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/abdera/
>
> Initial committers:
> abdera=eliast,rubys,yoavs
>
I personally prefer bugzilla for the simple fact that I've very little
experience with Jira :-) ... either is fine tho... the proposal was just
following what I saw in some of the other proposals :-)
- James
Paul Querna wrote:
>[snip]
>> Perhaps we should consult the initial project members and s
Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 6/5/06, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On 6/5/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>> With the following votes cast:
>>
>> +1 Sam Ruby
>> +1 Garrett Rooney
>> +1 Paul Fremantle
>> +1 Davanum Srinivas
>> +
On 6/5/06, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On 6/5/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>> With the following votes cast:
>>
>> +1 Sam Ruby
>> +1 Garrett Rooney
>> +1 Paul Fremantle
>> +1 Davanum Srinivas
>> +1 Yoav Shapira
>> +1
Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 6/5/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
With the following votes cast:
+1 Sam Ruby
+1 Garrett Rooney
+1 Paul Fremantle
+1 Davanum Srinivas
+1 Yoav Shapira
+1 Jim Jagielski
+1 Robert Burrell Donkin
+1 Martin Cooper
+1 Geir Magnusson
Hi Robert,
The incubator-activemq-4.0.jar is an uber jar that is built by
aggregating the activemq broker, client and a few dependency jars like
derby. I think derby is where IBM reference comes from and also
explains the multiple copies of the same file thing (different jars
were using differen
On 6/4/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 10:17:46AM -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Leo Simons wrote:
> > Let's write a piece of software to do the auditing for us.
>
> How do you propose to do this? How do you propose to audit the code and
> know which pieces of
On 6/5/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We ended up recutting the binary of the 4.0 release of ActiveMQ to
address a few issues brought up in the Incubator PMC vote; I'd just
like to call another vote to explicitly approve the new binary distro
to avoid confusion (as most Incubator
On 6/2/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not so fond of the actual word "mentor" (or, for that matter,
"champion") at all.
i dunno - champion's nicely quaint. i quite like the sound of sam having to
defend the honour of Abdera in mortal combat :-)
(i'll refrain from similar co
On 6/5/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
With the following votes cast:
+1 Sam Ruby
+1 Garrett Rooney
+1 Paul Fremantle
+1 Davanum Srinivas
+1 Yoav Shapira
+1 Jim Jagielski
+1 Robert Burrell Donkin
+1 Martin Cooper
+1 Geir Magnusson Jr
... this vote pass
Sam Ruby wrote:
With the following votes cast:
+1 Sam Ruby
+1 Garrett Rooney
+1 Paul Fremantle
+1 Davanum Srinivas
+1 Yoav Shapira
+1 Jim Jagielski
+1 Robert Burrell Donkin
+1 Martin Cooper
+1 Geir Magnusson Jr
... this vote passes.
At this point I'd like to ask that the mentors (Garr
Charles Mark wrote:
What's happening with Kabuki? Looking at email archives, apparently
it was approved in February. Three months later, there is still no
development, no community, and no code, and apparently no activity
either. Sam Ruby is champion and mentor of Kabuki, right? Would you
mind a
We ended up recutting the binary of the 4.0 release of ActiveMQ to
address a few issues brought up in the Incubator PMC vote; I'd just
like to call another vote to explicitly approve the new binary distro
to avoid confusion (as most Incubator PMC folks voted on the previous
binary).
Can I ask the
On 6/3/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/2/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like the idea of automation.
>
> What would be even more helpful would be a default Apache project
> setup, with a maven release target that builds a release in the right
> format.
>
> If
On 6/2/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(this is a rant and the beginnings of a proposal which has nothing to do
in particular with James, ActiveMQ, or its release)
There must be. All these little rules and policies and practices (written
or unwritten) seem like they could be some
15 matches
Mail list logo
