Hiram Chirino wrote:
On 5/30/06, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 5/27/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 5/27/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Is STATUS appropriate to be bundled in the release?
>> >
>>
>> I had the
On 5/30/06, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 5/27/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 5/27/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Is STATUS appropriate to be bundled in the release?
>> >
>>
>> I had the same question relating
Cliff has been doing so. Frankly, I suspect that many ASF projects need to
clean up their releases to conform with the currently solidifying ASF-wide
guidelines, but the Incubator PMC is more aware of them, and more diligent
in applying them.
From the perspective of being involved in one of
Agreed. Any tools that help incubating projects get off to the right
start we be a good start. Even if it's just a check list that has all
the things that have been found to be missing before in previous
attempted releases would be a great idea.
On 6/2/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Shame on me for not cc'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Here's the notification
of the vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hen
On 5/29/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vote passed for Jeff to be invited to become a committer.
+1's from:
Dave Johnson
Matt Raible
Elias Torres
Anil Gangolli
Lance Lavando
I like the idea of automation.
What would be even more helpful would be a default Apache project
setup, with a maven release target that builds a release in the right
format.
If the project structure started out with LICENSE, NOTICE, JAR targets
that put those in META-INF, places to put auxiliar
Hi Venkat,
You have my attention.
Reddy, Venkat wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I work for CA (formerly called as Computer Associates), and currently
> I’m a committer on couple of apache projects in the web services area.
> This is regarding donating JXplorer, a CA product, to Apache Directory
> projec
On Jun 2, 2006, at 9:06 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
(this is a rant and the beginnings of a proposal which has nothing
to do
in particular with James, ActiveMQ, or its release)
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 01:11:35PM +0100, James Strachan wrote:
In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see
Leo Simons wrote:
> People are doing stuff, trying to comply with all kinds of policies,
> and then instead of self-governing they have to go ask permission.
> When you need to ask for it, you're not self-governing.
Self-governance is a learned behavior, and one of the things that the
Incubator
(this is a rant and the beginnings of a proposal which has nothing to do
in particular with James, ActiveMQ, or its release)
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 01:11:35PM +0100, James Strachan wrote:
> In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the
> ActiveMQ community has voted on and ap
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 10:17:44AM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
> >>Mentors:
> >
> > One more would be good :-)
>
> First, I'm of the camp that the right number of mentors is one, but I
> respect that others differ on this.
*shrug*. What's in a name...I'll be less brief below :-)
> Second, no matter h
11 matches
Mail list logo
