Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve Synapse M2 release

2006-06-01 Thread Bill Stoddard
Paul Fremantle wrote: Hi Based on the feedback from Robert we have done the following changes: 1) Added a NOTICE.txt and LICENSE.txt in the binary and src distributions. 2) Added NOTICE and LICENSE to the meta-inf of the JAR 3) Put full info in the MANIFEST.MF 4) Renamed the ZIP files to Apache-

Re: [RESULT] Request to release (revised) Tuscany M1

2006-06-01 Thread Jeremy Boynes
On 6/1/06, Cliff Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: yes -- it's true that the policy is still only proposed and that the proposed policy allows for a transition/evaluation period to see the impact of some of the requirements. I would not suggest that you remove something from the release just be

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve Synapse M2 release

2006-06-01 Thread Paul Fremantle
Robert in general, i like this (but i tend to keep them with the libraries) but there are some good reasons why a single license file is recommended for apache releases ( http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses). Thanks. As Apache Synapse stabilises we m

Re: [VOTE] Incubator to sponsor and accept Abdera for incubation

2006-06-01 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 6/1/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Leo Simons wrote: >> >>Champion: Sam Ruby >> >>Mentors: >> >> * Garrett Rooney >> * Paul Querna > > One more would be good :-). Perhaps you should volunteer -- you're > pretty good at it...and you'll be working on the stuff anyway... Only as a last

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve Synapse M2 release

2006-06-01 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 6/1/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Based on the feedback from Robert we have done the following changes: 1) Added a NOTICE.txt and LICENSE.txt in the binary and src distributions. 2) Added NOTICE and LICENSE to the meta-inf of the JAR 3) Put full info in the MANIFEST.MF 4)

Re: [RESULT] Request to release (revised) Tuscany M1

2006-06-01 Thread Cliff Schmidt
yes -- it's true that the policy is still only proposed and that the proposed policy allows for a transition/evaluation period to see the impact of some of the requirements. I would not suggest that you remove something from the release just because it's under the NPL. However, you should make s

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve ActiveMQ 4.0 Release

2006-06-01 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1 On Jun 1, 2006, at 12:54 PM, James Strachan wrote: Hi Jim On 5/27/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: README.txt and userGuide.html (at least) should be updated to reflect Apache ActiveMQ, not just 'ActiveMQ' Is STATUS appropriate to be bundled in the release? Will vote +1 after

Re: [VOTE] Incubator to sponsor and accept Abdera for incubation

2006-06-01 Thread Jim Jagielski
On May 31, 2006, at 9:13 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: This proposal seems to have generated a lot of geniune interest, so now I'm calling for a vote for the Incubator to formally accept it. A few editorial comments: at this point, I have little doubt that this codebase will attract a diverse and sust

Re: [RESULT] Request to release (revised) Tuscany M1

2006-06-01 Thread ant elder
Is pulling this M1 release really necessary? I was under the impression that right now it _is_ ok to be redistributing the NPL 1.1 licensed Rhino binary. Back in August last year the ASF board Special Order 6B, Allow redistribution of MPL- and NPL-licensed executables, was approved by unanimous co

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve Synapse M2 release

2006-06-01 Thread ant elder
+1 (non-binding) ...ant Paul Fremantle wrote: Hi Based on the feedback from Robert we have done the following changes: 1) Added a NOTICE.txt and LICENSE.txt in the binary and src distributions. 2) Added NOTICE and LICENSE to the meta-inf of the JAR 3) Put full info in the MANIFEST.MF 4) Rena

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve ActiveMQ 4.0 Release

2006-06-01 Thread James Strachan
Hi Jim On 5/27/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: README.txt and userGuide.html (at least) should be updated to reflect Apache ActiveMQ, not just 'ActiveMQ' Is STATUS appropriate to be bundled in the release? Will vote +1 after the above are addressed. I think we've addressed your

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve Synapse M2 release

2006-06-01 Thread Sam Ruby
Paul Fremantle wrote: > Hi > > Based on the feedback from Robert we have done the following changes: > 1) Added a NOTICE.txt and LICENSE.txt in the binary and src distributions. > 2) Added NOTICE and LICENSE to the meta-inf of the JAR > 3) Put full info in the MANIFEST.MF > 4) Renamed the ZIP file

Re: [VOTE] Incubator to sponsor and accept Abdera for incubation

2006-06-01 Thread James M Snell
Yoav Shapira wrote: > Hi, > +1 on accepting the proposal for incubation. > > I am also interested in personally contributing to this project as a > committer, though I regretfully do not have the bandwidth to > effectively mentor this proposal. I hope the proposal team doesn't > mind that I've j

Re: [VOTE] Incubator to sponsor and accept Abdera for incubation

2006-06-01 Thread James M Snell
Sam Ruby wrote: >[snip] > However, with that being said, whatever the wiki page may say, the > people on this project will receive the benefit (ha!) of my personal > style of quiet mentoring. > And your test cases. Don't forget your test cases. Test cases are Good. :-) - James --

Re: [VOTE] Incubator to sponsor and accept Abdera for incubation

2006-06-01 Thread Sam Ruby
Leo Simons wrote: >> >>Champion: Sam Ruby >> >>Mentors: >> >> * Garrett Rooney >> * Paul Querna > > One more would be good :-). Perhaps you should volunteer -- you're > pretty good at it...and you'll be working on the stuff anyway... Only as a last resort. ;-) First, I'm of the camp that the ri

Re: [RESULT] Request to release (revised) Tuscany M1

2006-06-01 Thread Jeremy Boynes
On 5/31/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please check with Cliff that your understanding regarding Rhino distribution as you explained it to Bill's objection is correct. Not to hold up the release, since you've documented the license and are in the Incubator, but just to be sure fo

Re: [VOTE] Incubator to sponsor and accept Abdera for incubation

2006-06-01 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, +1 on accepting the proposal for incubation. I am also interested in personally contributing to this project as a committer, though I regretfully do not have the bandwidth to effectively mentor this proposal. I hope the proposal team doesn't mind that I've just added myself to the wiki as a

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve Synapse M2 release

2006-06-01 Thread Paul Fremantle
Hi Based on the feedback from Robert we have done the following changes: 1) Added a NOTICE.txt and LICENSE.txt in the binary and src distributions. 2) Added NOTICE and LICENSE to the meta-inf of the JAR 3) Put full info in the MANIFEST.MF 4) Renamed the ZIP files to Apache-Synapse-Incubating-M2.*

Re: [VOTE] Incubator to sponsor and accept Abdera for incubation

2006-06-01 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 from me. On 6/1/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 from me. Paul On 6/1/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This proposal seems to have generated a lot of geniune interest, so now > I'm calling for a vote for the Incubator to formally accept it. > > A few editorial comme

Re: [VOTE] Incubator to sponsor and accept Abdera for incubation

2006-06-01 Thread Paul Fremantle
+1 from me. Paul On 6/1/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This proposal seems to have generated a lot of geniune interest, so now I'm calling for a vote for the Incubator to formally accept it. A few editorial comments: at this point, I have little doubt that this codebase will attract a

Re: [VOTE] Incubator to sponsor and accept Abdera for incubation

2006-06-01 Thread Leo Simons
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:13:25PM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: > This proposal seems to have generated a lot of geniune interest yup, seems like it. > We request that the Apache Incubator PMC sponsor the Abdera Atom > implementation as an incubating project. > > Champion: Sam Ruby > > Mentors: > >

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve Synapse M2 release

2006-06-01 Thread Paul Fremantle
Robert Thanks for the detailed review - I really appreciate it. I'll go away and sort out those items! Paul On 5/31/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/30/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The release files are here: > > http://people.apache.org/~pzf/syna

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-06-01 Thread Samisa Abeysinghe
Things like the README: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/axis2/trunk/c/axiom/README Axiom/C was moved to a separate folder only recently, however it is still part of Axis2/C Here is a tutorial: http://ws.apache.org/axis2/c/docs/om_tutorial.html Please try the tutorial with 0.91 r